Reviews of Inlingua Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria
Total No. of Reviews: 23
NOTE: All evaluations are authentic. Only former participants who have booked a course with us at the school can publish evaluations after the end of the course. Schools could therefore not manipulate evaluations and you can trust in all published evaluations.
| Overall rating Inlingua Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria |  4.1/5.0 (23 reviews) |
|---|---|
| City |  4.7/5.0 |
| Organisation | 4.1/5.0 |
| Facilities |  3.6/5.0 |
| Social activities | 3.3/5.0 |
| Course Quality / Progress in language | 4.2/5.0 |
| Value for money | 3.8/5.0 |
| Accommodation | |
| Host Family | 4.1/5.0 |
| Shared flat (apartment) | 3.4/5.0 |
| Other | 3.6/5.0 |
Individual Reviews
1. Sep. 2012
1. Juan Ignacio (45 years) - Spain
1. Standard (20) - 3 weeks
1. Standard (20) - 3 weeks
Overall rating
Value for money
Detailed review
City/place
School organization
Facilities (library, classrooms)
Social activities
Quality of teaching / language progress
7. Jul. 2012
2. Jamal (20 years) - United States
2. Standard (20) - 2 weeks
2. Standard (20) - 2 weeks
Overall rating
Value for money
Detailed review
City/place
School organization
Facilities (library, classrooms)
Social activities
Quality of teaching / language progress
Accommodation
Host Family
Shared flat (apartment)
Other
29. Aug. 2011
3. Caio (35 years) - Italy
3. Standard (20) - 2 weeks
3. Standard (20) - 2 weeks
Overall rating
Value for money
Detailed review
City/place
School organization
Facilities (library, classrooms)
Social activities
Quality of teaching / language progress
Accommodation
Other
Additional information
Positive aspects of school
Teacher
3. Aug. 2011
4. Maria Jose (42 years) - Spain
4. Standard (20) - 2 weeks
4. Standard (20) - 2 weeks
Overall rating
Value for money
Detailed review
City/place
School organization
Facilities (library, classrooms)
Social activities
Quality of teaching / language progress
Accommodation
Host Family
Shared flat (apartment)
Hotels*** / *****
Additional information
Positive aspects of school
What I liked the most is that I could practice my oral skills. We did practice a lot of conversation.
Other comments
The real time of classes was about 25 hours in the whole course (2 weeks) and it wasn't 40 hours, as it was supposed to be. The price of the hotels that Inlingua offered was more expensive than the price that Inlingua indicates in its web (although I said I was an Inlingua student).
6. Sep. 2010
5. Quan-ling (42 years) - Switzerland
5. Standard (20) - 3 weeks
5. Standard (20) - 3 weeks
Overall rating
Value for money
Detailed review
City/place
School organization
Facilities (library, classrooms)
Social activities
Quality of teaching / language progress
Accommodation
Host Family
Additional information
Positive aspects of school
Located in the centre of the old town of Salzburg.
Insider tips about what future students should not miss
Students should try to go to Salzburg during the summer music festival.
Other comments
School should ban smoking from its premises.
12. Jul. 2010
6. Pattipeg S (61 years) - United States
6. Standard (20) - 4 weeks
6. Standard (20) - 4 weeks
Overall rating
Value for money
Detailed review
City/place
School organization
Facilities (library, classrooms)
Social activities
Quality of teaching / language progress
Accommodation
Host Family
Additional information
Positive aspects of school
Very small classes allowed for lots of personal attention.
Insider tips about what future students should not miss
My favorite attraction: Hellbrun Water Gardens.
Other comments
Inlingua uses a method that relies almost solely on oral instruction. Visual learners and those who like full grammar explanations will sometimes be frustrated.
16. Sep. 2009
7. Alexandra (41 years) - Switzerland
7. SD 20 PLUS (40 Group + 20 Ind) - 2 weeks
7. SD 20 PLUS (40 Group + 20 Ind) - 2 weeks
Overall rating
Value for money
Detailed review
City/place
School organization
Facilities (library, classrooms)
Social activities
Quality of teaching / language progress
Additional information
Positive aspects of school
Instructors
2. Mar. 2007
8. Helen (35 years) - United Kingdom
8. Standard (20) - 2 weeks
8. Standard (20) - 2 weeks
Overall rating
Value for money
Detailed review
City/place
School organization
Facilities (library, classrooms)
Social activities
Quality of teaching / language progress
Accommodation
Other
Additional information
Positive aspects of school
Location
24. Sep. 2006
9. Mayumi (27 years) - Japan
9. Standard (20) - 6 weeks
9. Standard (20) - 6 weeks
Overall rating
Value for money
Detailed review
City/place
School organization
Facilities (library, classrooms)
Social activities
Quality of teaching / language progress
Accommodation
Host Family
Shared flat (apartment)
Other
Additional information
Positive aspects of school
friends
Other comments
Almost good, but there are many kinds of teachers. If you can find a good teacher who cares about you, you`ll be able to spend a good time there.
9. Aug. 2006
10. Matthew (31 years) - Italy
10. Standard (20) - 4 weeks
10. Standard (20) - 4 weeks
Overall rating
Value for money
Detailed review
City/place
School organization
Facilities (library, classrooms)
Social activities
Quality of teaching / language progress
Additional information
Positive aspects of school
Teacher
6. Sep. 2012
11. Romain (35 years) - 
11. Intensive (30) - 4 weeks
11. Intensive (30) - 4 weeks
Overall rating
Value for money
Detailed review
City/place
School organization
Facilities (library, classrooms)
Social activities
Quality of teaching / language progress
Accommodation
Host Family
Shared flat (apartment)
Other
25. Jul. 2011
12. Silvia (23 years) - 
12. Standard (20) - 2 weeks
12. Standard (20) - 2 weeks
Overall rating
Value for money
Detailed review
City/place
School organization
Facilities (library, classrooms)
Social activities
Quality of teaching / language progress
Accommodation
Youth Hostel
Additional information
Positive aspects of school
The central location.
Insider tips about what future students should not miss
You cannot choose your schedule.
Other comments
My course was from 11:00 to 15:00, I would have preferred from 9:00 to 13:00.
22. Jun. 2011
13. Mayu (22 years) - 
13. Standard (20) - 4 weeks
13. Standard (20) - 4 weeks
Overall rating
Value for money
Detailed review
City/place
School organization
Facilities (library, classrooms)
Social activities
Quality of teaching / language progress
Accommodation
Host Family
23. Aug. 2010
14. Ferenc (17 years) - 
14. Intensive (30) - 2 weeks
14. Intensive (30) - 2 weeks
Overall rating
Value for money
Detailed review
City/place
School organization
Facilities (library, classrooms)
Social activities
Quality of teaching / language progress
Accommodation
Host Family
Additional information
Positive aspects of school
The facilities and the location of the school.
26. May. 2010
15. Henk (25 years) - 
15. Standard (20) - 2 weeks
15. Standard (20) - 2 weeks
Overall rating
Value for money
Detailed review
City/place
School organization
Facilities (library, classrooms)
Social activities
Quality of teaching / language progress
Additional information
Positive aspects of school
The flexibility, I received individual instruction and group training content was tailored to my future profession
6. Apr. 2010
16. Emil (21 years) -
16. Standard (20) - 8 weeks
16. Standard (20) - 8 weeks
Overall rating
Value for money
Detailed review
City/place
School organization
Facilities (library, classrooms)
Social activities
Quality of teaching / language progress
Accommodation
Host Family
Additional information
Positive aspects of school
very well trained
Insider tips about what future students should not miss
nothing, because they are really good
19. Nov. 2008
17. Natalia (25 years) - 
17. Standard (20) - 3 weeks
17. Standard (20) - 3 weeks
Overall rating
Value for money
Detailed review
City/place
School organization
Facilities (library, classrooms)
Social activities
Quality of teaching / language progress
Accommodation
Youth Hostel
Additional information
Positive aspects of school
to speak all the time
Other comments
not afraid to speak, isn't so easy and funny
5. Nov. 2007
18. Stefano -
18. Standard (20) - 2 weeks
18. Standard (20) - 2 weeks
Overall rating
Value for money
Detailed review
City/place
School organization
Facilities (library, classrooms)
Social activities
Quality of teaching / language progress
Accommodation
Host Family
Additional information
Positive aspects of school
Teachers are so professional
Insider tips about what future students should not miss
Where they go to sleep
6. Jul. 2007
19. Akiko (27 years) -
19. Standard (20) - 3 weeks
19. Standard (20) - 3 weeks
Overall rating
Value for money
Detailed review
City/place
School organization
Facilities (library, classrooms)
Social activities
Quality of teaching / language progress
25. Apr. 2007
20. Toshimitsu (32 years) -
20. Standard (20) - 2 weeks
20. Standard (20) - 2 weeks
Overall rating
Value for money
Detailed review
City/place
School organization
Facilities (library, classrooms)
Social activities
Quality of teaching / language progress
Accommodation
Host Family
Additional information
Positive aspects of school
The classes are very well organized.
Insider tips about what future students should not miss
I have tried several language schools, but this school is highly recommended.
Other comments
The staff are very kind and they introduced about school very well, both of before the course and during it.
25. Aug. 2004
21. Tim (20 years) - England
21. Standard Course
21. Standard Course
Overall rating
Value for money
Detailed review
City/place
School organization
Facilities (library, classrooms)
Social activities
Quality of teaching / language progress
Accommodation
Host Family
Additional information
Positive aspects of school
friendly class
4. Aug. 2004
22. Rosemary (49 years) - Usa (new York/georgia)
22. Standard Course
22. Standard Course
Overall rating
Value for money
Detailed review
City/place
School organization
Facilities (library, classrooms)
Social activities
Quality of teaching / language progress
Accommodation
Host Family
Additional information
Positive aspects of school
excellent and friendly teacher(s)
Insider tips about what future students should not miss
rooftop terrace/cafe just down the street and to the left on the street that goes along the river
Other comments
great location, very good teachers, comfortable atmosphere,
Public transportation is very easy, comfortable, safe, pleasant, convenient, cheap. (Student should buy weekly ticket (10 Euros as of this date) (sold in tabaks) for unlimited rides).)
5. May. 2004
23. Kate (24 years) - Usa
23. Standard Course
23. Standard Course
Overall rating
Value for money
Detailed review
City/place
School organization
Facilities (library, classrooms)
Social activities
Quality of teaching / language progress
Accommodation
Host Family
Shared flat (apartment)
Additional information
Positive aspects of school
The size of the class was great
