Reviews of FLS - Chesnut Hill College, Philadelphia, USA
Total number of reviews: 3
NOTE: All reviews are authentic. Only students who booked their course through us can publish evaluations here, and only after the end of their programme. These evaluations then are not manipulated in any way, neither by us nor by the school, and can be trusted as honest opinions about personal experiences with the school.
Average Rating
Based on 3 reviews of former students of FLS - Chesnut Hill College
Overall rating FLS - Chesnut Hill College, Philadelphia, USA | 4.7 |
---|---|
City | 5.0 |
Organisation | 5.0 |
Facilities | 5.0 |
Social activities | 4.0 |
Quality of teaching | 4.7 |
Value for money | 5.0 |
Accommodation | |
Homestay | 5.0 |
Shared Flat (apartment) | --- |
Other | 5.0 |
Individual Reviews
FLS - Chesnut Hill College
2. Sep. 2019
1. Chloé (21 years) France
101.Course: Intensive English - 2 weeks
101.Course: Intensive English - 2 weeks
Overall rating
Value for money
Detailed review
City/place
School organization
Facilities (library, classrooms)
Social activities
Quality of teaching / language progress
Accommodation
Homestay
13. Aug. 2018
2. Andrés (25 years) Ecuador
102.Course: Academic English [English] - 4 weeks
102.Course: Academic English [English] - 4 weeks
Overall rating
Value for money
Detailed review
City/place
School organization
Facilities (library, classrooms)
Social activities
Quality of teaching / language progress
Accommodation
Homestay
Additional information
Positive aspects of school
I like the fact that it was in a safe area. Also it has great teachers and excellent facilities.
Insider tips about what future students should not miss
Students must take care in some neighbourhoods in Philadelphia. It can be very dangerous.
Other comments
Great teacher and facilities but their program is not so solid. And sometimes they mix many levels into the same class.
6. Sep. 2016
3. Joanna (20 years)
103.Course: General English - 2 weeks
103.Course: General English - 2 weeks
Overall rating
Value for money
Detailed review
City/place
School organization
Facilities (library, classrooms)
Social activities
Quality of teaching / language progress
Accommodation
Other