X

Reviews of Actilangue, Nice, France

Total number of reviews: 79
NOTE: All reviews are authentic. Only students who booked their course through us can publish evaluations here, and only after the end of their programme. These evaluations then are not manipulated in any way, neither by us nor by the school, and can be trusted as honest opinions about personal experiences with the school.

Average Rating

Based on 79 reviews of former students of Actilangue
Overall Rating
Actilangue, Nice, France

Rating: 4.2

4.2 
City

Rating: 4.7

4.7 
Organisation

Rating: 4.1

4.1 
Facilities

Rating: 3.5

3.5 
Social activities

Rating: 3.5

3.5 
Course quality / Progress in language

Rating: 4.1

4.1 
Value for money

Rating: 4.2

4.2 
Accommodation
Homestay

Rating: 4.4

4.4 
Shared Flat

Rating: 3.0

3.0 
other ---

Individual Reviews

Actilangue
1. Sep. 2020
1. Ekaterina (30 years)  
101. Course:  Half Intensive Course  - 3 weeks

Overall Rating

Rating: 4/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 3/5.0

Detailed review
City/place

Rating: 5/5.0

School organization

Rating: 4/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 2/5.0

Social activities

Rating: 3/5.0

Quality of teaching / language progress
---
Accommodation
Homestay

Rating: 5/5.0

25. Aug. 2020
2. Erica (63 years)  
102. Course:  General Course  - 2 weeks

Overall Rating

Rating: 3/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 3/5.0

Detailed review
City/place

Rating: 4/5.0

School organization

Rating: 3/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 1/5.0

Social activities

Rating: 1/5.0

Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 4/5.0

Accommodation
Residence France Riviera

Rating: 3/5.0

18. Aug. 2020
3. Agne (25 years)  United Kingdom
103. Course:  Half Intensive Course  - 2 weeks

Overall Rating

Rating: 4/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 4/5.0

Detailed review
City/place

Rating: 5/5.0

School organization

Rating: 4/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 2/5.0

Social activities
---
Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 2/5.0

27. Jul. 2020
4. Ekaterina (30 years)  
104. Course:  Half Intensive Course  - 3 weeks

Overall Rating

Rating: 4/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 5/5.0

Detailed review
City/place

Rating: 5/5.0

School organization

Rating: 5/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 3/5.0

Social activities

Rating: 3/5.0

Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 5/5.0

Accommodation
Homestay

Rating: 5/5.0

16. Mar. 2020
5. Bartizan (69 years)  
105. Course:  General Course  - 4 weeks

Overall Rating

Rating: 3/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 3/5.0

Detailed review
City/place

Rating: 4/5.0

School organization

Rating: 4/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 3/5.0

Social activities

Rating: 1/5.0

Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 4/5.0

16. Mar. 2020
6. Tatiana (50 years)  
106. Course:  Intensive Course [Французский] - 2 weeks

Overall Rating

Rating: 5/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 5/5.0

Detailed review
City/place

Rating: 5/5.0

School organization

Rating: 5/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)
---
Social activities

Rating: 5/5.0

Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 5/5.0

26. Feb. 2020
7. María Eugenia (34 years)  
107. Course:  General Course  - 2 weeks

Overall Rating

Rating: 5/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 5/5.0

Detailed review
City/place

Rating: 5/5.0

School organization

Rating: 5/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 5/5.0

Social activities
---
Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 5/5.0

Accommodation
Homestay

Rating: 5/5.0

22. Jan. 2020
8. Halina (61 years)  Canada
108. Course:  General Course  - 5 weeks

Overall Rating

Rating: 5/5.0

Value for money
---
Detailed review
City/place

Rating: 5/5.0

School organization
---
Facilities (library, classrooms)
---
Social activities
---
Quality of teaching / language progress
---
18. Nov. 2019
9. Jon Gisle (66 years)  Norway
109. Course:  Course No 2  - 2 weeks

Overall Rating

Rating: 4/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 4/5.0

Detailed review
City/place

Rating: 4/5.0

School organization

Rating: 3/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 3/5.0

Social activities
---
Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 4/5.0

Accommodation
Residence France Riviera

Rating: 4/5.0

1. Nov. 2019
10. Heinz (81 years)  
110. Course:  Course No 1 - 2 weeks

Overall Rating

Rating: 3/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 3/5.0

Detailed review
City/place

Rating: 3/5.0

School organization

Rating: 3/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 2/5.0

Social activities
---
Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 4/5.0

Accommodation
Homestay

Rating: 3/5.0

29. Oct. 2019
11. Darina (38 years)  Czech Republic
111. Course:  General Course  - 2 weeks

Overall Rating

Rating: 4/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 3/5.0

Detailed review
City/place

Rating: 5/5.0

School organization

Rating: 3/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 3/5.0

Social activities
---
Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 3/5.0

Accommodation
Homestay

Rating: 4/5.0

29. Oct. 2019
12. Mayuko  (52 years)  Japan
112. Course:  General Course  - 2 weeks

Overall Rating

Rating: 4/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 5/5.0

Detailed review
City/place

Rating: 5/5.0

School organization

Rating: 3/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 3/5.0

Social activities

Rating: 3/5.0

Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 3/5.0

Accommodation
Homestay

Rating: 5/5.0

21. Oct. 2019
13.  (49 years)  
113. Course:  Course No 1 - 2 weeks

Overall Rating

Rating: 5/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 5/5.0

Detailed review
City/place

Rating: 5/5.0

School organization

Rating: 5/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 5/5.0

Social activities

Rating: 5/5.0

Quality of teaching / language progress
---
Accommodation
Homestay

Rating: 5/5.0

Additional information
Positive aspects of school:
Very interesting lessons...
7. Oct. 2019
14.  (28 years)  
114. Course:  Course No 1 - 2 weeks

Overall Rating

Rating: 5/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 5/5.0

Detailed review
City/place

Rating: 5/5.0

School organization

Rating: 4/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 4/5.0

Social activities
---
Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 5/5.0

Additional information
Positive aspects of school:
The books and the addition exercises were interesting and helpful.
30. Sep. 2019
15. Inés (28 years)  Spain
115. Course:  Course No 3 - 2 weeks

Overall Rating

Rating: 5/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 5/5.0

Detailed review
City/place

Rating: 5/5.0

School organization

Rating: 5/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 4/5.0

Social activities

Rating: 4/5.0

Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 5/5.0

Accommodation
Homestay

Rating: 5/5.0

23. Sep. 2019
16.  (76 years)  Germany
116. Course:  Course No 3 [Französisch] - 3 weeks

Overall Rating

Rating: 5/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 5/5.0

Detailed review
City/place

Rating: 5/5.0

School organization

Rating: 5/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 3/5.0

Social activities

Rating: 3/5.0

Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 5/5.0

Accommodation
Homestay

Rating: 3/5.0

Additional information
Positive aspects of school:
The standard of teaching is excellent. All teachers very competent, patient and friendly.
7. Sep. 2019
17. Manana (22 years)  Russia
117. Course:  Course No 1 [French] - 4 weeks

Overall Rating

Rating: 4/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 4/5.0

Detailed review
City/place

Rating: 5/5.0

School organization

Rating: 3/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 3/5.0

Social activities

Rating: 3/5.0

Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 5/5.0

Accommodation
Homestay

Rating: 2/5.0

4. Sep. 2019
18. Chiara (24 years)  United Arab Emirates
118. Course:  Course No 2  - 3 weeks

Overall Rating

Rating: 5/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 5/5.0

Detailed review
City/place

Rating: 5/5.0

School organization

Rating: 5/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 5/5.0

Social activities

Rating: 5/5.0

Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 5/5.0

Accommodation
Homestay

Rating: 5/5.0

3. Sep. 2019
19. Lis (35 years)  Switzerland
119. Course:  Course No 1 [Français] - 2 weeks

Overall Rating

Rating: 4/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 5/5.0

Detailed review
City/place
---
School organization

Rating: 4/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 5/5.0

Social activities

Rating: 5/5.0

Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 4/5.0

26. Aug. 2019
20. Giada (25 years)  Italy
120. Course:  Course No 1 - 3 weeks

Overall Rating

Rating: 4/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 4/5.0

Detailed review
City/place

Rating: 4/5.0

School organization

Rating: 4/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 5/5.0

Social activities
---
Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 3/5.0

Accommodation
Homestay

Rating: 5/5.0

21. Aug. 2019
21.  (28 years)  Singapore
121. Course:  Course No 2 [French] - 6 weeks

Overall Rating

Rating: 4/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 5/5.0

Detailed review
City/place

Rating: 4/5.0

School organization

Rating: 3/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 3/5.0

Social activities

Rating: 5/5.0

Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 4/5.0

Accommodation
Homestay

Rating: 4/5.0

Additional information
Positive aspects of school:
Teachers were very friendly and helpful.
Other comments:
The pacing was a bit slow due to many new students coming in per week but there should be no problem asking to skip levels if you feel like it's too slow for you.
19. Aug. 2019
22. Marcel (54 years)  Spain
122. Course:  Course No 1 - 2 weeks

Overall Rating

Rating: 4/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 5/5.0

Detailed review
City/place
---
School organization

Rating: 4/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 3/5.0

Social activities

Rating: 4/5.0

Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 5/5.0

19. Aug. 2019
23. Lori (60 years)  United States
123. Course:  Course No 1 - 2 weeks

Overall Rating

Rating: 3/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 4/5.0

Detailed review
City/place

Rating: 5/5.0

School organization

Rating: 4/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 3/5.0

Social activities

Rating: 3/5.0

Quality of teaching / language progress
---
14. Aug. 2019
24. Sarah Marie (24 years)  Germany
124. Course:  Course No 3 - 2 weeks

Overall Rating

Rating: 5/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 4/5.0

Detailed review
City/place

Rating: 5/5.0

School organization

Rating: 5/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 4/5.0

Social activities

Rating: 4/5.0

Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 5/5.0

Accommodation
Homestay

Rating: 5/5.0

9. Aug. 2019
25. Cynthia (26 years)  United States
125. Course:  Course No 1 - 3 weeks

Overall Rating

Rating: 5/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 5/5.0

Detailed review
City/place

Rating: 5/5.0

School organization

Rating: 5/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 5/5.0

Social activities

Rating: 5/5.0

Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 5/5.0

Accommodation
Homestay

Rating: 5/5.0

4. Aug. 2019
26.  (35 years)  Russia
126. Course:  Course No 1 - 2 weeks

Overall Rating

Rating: 5/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 5/5.0

Detailed review
City/place

Rating: 5/5.0

School organization

Rating: 4/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 4/5.0

Social activities

Rating: 5/5.0

Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 5/5.0

Accommodation
Homestay

Rating: 4/5.0

Additional information
Positive aspects of school:
Good, competent teachers who did not allow boredom in the classroom. And communicated exactly at the level at which their students were. I think this is very important.
Insider tips about what future students should not miss:
Communicate more with each other. To get acquainted before classes begin.
30. Jul. 2019
27. John (60 years)  Australia
127. Course:  Course No 1 [French] - 2 weeks

Overall Rating

Rating: 4/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 4/5.0

Detailed review
City/place

Rating: 5/5.0

School organization

Rating: 5/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 3/5.0

Social activities

Rating: 4/5.0

Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 4/5.0

Accommodation
Homestay

Rating: 4/5.0

30. Jul. 2019
28. Emilie  (25 years)  Norway
128. Course:  Course No 3 [Fransk] - 2 weeks

Overall Rating

Rating: 4/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 5/5.0

Detailed review
City/place

Rating: 5/5.0

School organization

Rating: 5/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 2/5.0

Social activities

Rating: 3/5.0

Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 5/5.0

Accommodation
Homestay

Rating: 3/5.0

29. Jul. 2019
29. Irene (21 years)  Spain
129. Course:  Course No 1 - 4 weeks

Overall Rating

Rating: 3/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 4/5.0

Detailed review
City/place

Rating: 5/5.0

School organization

Rating: 3/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 2/5.0

Social activities

Rating: 4/5.0

Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 3/5.0

16. Jul. 2019
30. Marlen (34 years)  Switzerland
130. Course:  Course No 2  - 2 weeks

Overall Rating

Rating: 5/5.0

Value for money
---
Detailed review
City/place
---
School organization
---
Facilities (library, classrooms)
---
Social activities
---
Quality of teaching / language progress
---
8. Jul. 2019
31. Nina (18 years)  Switzerland
131. Course:  Course No 2  - 10 weeks

Overall Rating

Rating: 5/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 5/5.0

Detailed review
City/place

Rating: 5/5.0

School organization

Rating: 4/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 4/5.0

Social activities

Rating: 5/5.0

Quality of teaching / language progress
---
Accommodation
Homestay

Rating: 4/5.0

2. Jul. 2019
32.  (23 years)  United Kingdom
132. Course:  Course No 3 - 2 weeks

Overall Rating

Rating: 4/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 4/5.0

Detailed review
City/place

Rating: 4/5.0

School organization

Rating: 4/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 3/5.0

Social activities

Rating: 4/5.0

Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 4/5.0

Accommodation
Homestay

Rating: 5/5.0

Additional information
Positive aspects of school:
Teachers were very charismatic and driven to help you learn.
Insider tips about what future students should not miss:
Make the most of the courses no.2 or no.3 because they boost your confidence to speak - which is the most important skill after all.
24. Jun. 2019
33. Leandro (32 years)  Germany
133. Course:  Course No 1 - 2 weeks

Overall Rating

Rating: 3/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 3/5.0

Detailed review
City/place

Rating: 5/5.0

School organization

Rating: 1/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 1/5.0

Social activities

Rating: 1/5.0

Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 1/5.0

22. May. 2019
34. Eva (26 years)  
134. Course:  Course No 2 - 3 weeks

Overall Rating

Rating: 5/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 5/5.0

Detailed review
City/place

Rating: 5/5.0

School organization

Rating: 5/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 5/5.0

Social activities

Rating: 5/5.0

Quality of teaching / language progress
---
20. May. 2019
35. Malte (29 years)  Germany
135. Course:  Course No 3 - 2 weeks

Overall Rating

Rating: 5/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 5/5.0

Detailed review
City/place

Rating: 5/5.0

School organization

Rating: 5/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 3/5.0

Social activities
---
Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 5/5.0

1. May. 2019
36. Vinh (28 years)  Italy
136. Course:  Course No 1 - 4 weeks

Overall Rating

Rating: 5/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 5/5.0

Detailed review
City/place

Rating: 5/5.0

School organization

Rating: 5/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 4/5.0

Social activities
---
Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 5/5.0

30. Apr. 2019
37. Antonio (31 years)  Italy
137. Course:  Course No 1 - 4 weeks

Overall Rating

Rating: 5/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 4/5.0

Detailed review
City/place

Rating: 5/5.0

School organization

Rating: 4/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 3/5.0

Social activities
---
Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 5/5.0

22. Apr. 2019
38. Irene (47 years)  Spain
138. Course:  C25 [French] - 1 week

Overall Rating

Rating: 5/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 4/5.0

Detailed review
City/place

Rating: 5/5.0

School organization

Rating: 5/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 4/5.0

Social activities

Rating: 3/5.0

Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 4/5.0

Accommodation
Homestay

Rating: 5/5.0

12. Apr. 2019
39.  (41 years)  Taiwan
139. Course:  Course No 1 - 4 weeks

Overall Rating

Rating: 4/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 4/5.0

Detailed review
City/place

Rating: 5/5.0

School organization

Rating: 4/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 4/5.0

Social activities
---
Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 5/5.0

Additional information
Positive aspects of school:
I liked the most my teacher Blandine. She is really great.
Other comments:
the biggest problem of the course was to include in the same class students with very different levels of knowledge of French. Furthermore, lots of time was lost in new student presentations every Mondays. But overall, everything was above my expectations. Very happy for choosing Actilangue and Nice!!
1. Apr. 2019
40. Manfred  (77 years)  Germany
140. Course:  Course No 1 [Französisch] - 4 weeks

Overall Rating

Rating: 4/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 4/5.0

Detailed review
City/place

Rating: 4/5.0

School organization

Rating: 3/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 4/5.0

Social activities
---
Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 5/5.0

18. Mar. 2019
41. Giancarlo (22 years)  United States
141. Course:  Course No 3 - 2 weeks

Overall Rating

Rating: 5/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 5/5.0

Detailed review
City/place

Rating: 5/5.0

School organization

Rating: 5/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 5/5.0

Social activities

Rating: 5/5.0

Quality of teaching / language progress
---
Accommodation
Residence France Riviera

Rating: 5/5.0

11. Mar. 2019
42. Lucie (40 years)  Malta
142. Course:  Course No 1 - 2 weeks

Overall Rating

Rating: 5/5.0

Value for money
---
Detailed review
City/place

Rating: 4/5.0

School organization
---
Facilities (library, classrooms)
---
Social activities
---
Quality of teaching / language progress
---
24. Feb. 2019
43. Michel (17 years)  Switzerland
143. Course:  Course No 3 - 2 weeks

Overall Rating

Rating: 4/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 3/5.0

Detailed review
City/place

Rating: 4/5.0

School organization

Rating: 3/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 2/5.0

Social activities

Rating: 1/5.0

Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 5/5.0

Accommodation
Homestay

Rating: 4/5.0

3. Dec. 2018
44.  (27 years)  
144. Course:  Course No 1 - 2 weeks

Overall Rating

Rating: 5/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 5/5.0

Detailed review
City/place

Rating: 5/5.0

School organization

Rating: 5/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 4/5.0

Social activities

Rating: 5/5.0

Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 5/5.0

Additional information
Positive aspects of school:
The team
Insider tips about what future students should not miss:
It's worth it!
Other comments:
Attentive teachers, good material and dynamic classes.
29. Nov. 2018
45.  (27 years)  
145. Course:  Course No 1 - 12 weeks

Overall Rating

Rating: 5/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 5/5.0

Detailed review
City/place

Rating: 5/5.0

School organization

Rating: 5/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 4/5.0

Social activities

Rating: 3/5.0

Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 5/5.0

Additional information
Positive aspects of school:
Spoken, writing, listening, reading are the points that you can extend the four skills.
Insider tips about what future students should not miss:
Although French entered at the beginner level, I was able to study while being supported by the teachers. At first I think you may be confused, but if you have a positive attitude to participate in the lesson, you will be able to speak French as much, so Actilangue recommends it.
4. Nov. 2018
46.  (27 years)  
146. Course:  Course No 2 (1 Woche) (25 Lektionen pro Woche) + Course No 3 (2 Wochen) (30 Lektionen pro Woche) - 3 weeks

Overall Rating

Rating: 4/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 3/5.0

Detailed review
City/place

Rating: 5/5.0

School organization

Rating: 4/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 4/5.0

Social activities

Rating: 5/5.0

Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 4/5.0

Accommodation
Homestay

Rating: 4/5.0

29. Oct. 2018
47.  (23 years)  
147. Course:  Course No 1 [Французский] - 4 weeks

Overall Rating

Rating: 4/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 5/5.0

Detailed review
City/place

Rating: 5/5.0

School organization

Rating: 5/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 4/5.0

Social activities

Rating: 5/5.0

Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 5/5.0

Accommodation
Homestay

Rating: 5/5.0

Additional information
Positive aspects of school:
Great teachers
12. Sep. 2018
48.  (17 years)  France
148. Course:  Course No 1 - 3 weeks

Overall Rating

Rating: 4/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 2/5.0

Detailed review
City/place

Rating: 5/5.0

School organization

Rating: 5/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 4/5.0

Social activities

Rating: 4/5.0

Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 5/5.0

Additional information
Positive aspects of school:
the teacher and the students
11. Sep. 2018
49.  (26 years)  
149. Course:  Course No 1 - 6 weeks

Overall Rating

Rating: 2/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 3/5.0

Detailed review
City/place

Rating: 5/5.0

School organization

Rating: 3/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 2/5.0

Social activities

Rating: 4/5.0

Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 3/5.0

Accommodation
Shared Flat Nice - Ville

Rating: 1/5.0

Additional information
Positive aspects of school:
I had two teachers in my six weeks. The second, Michelle, is a good teacher and I would repeat a course with her.
Insider tips about what future students should not miss:
Organise the accommodation on your own. The accommodations they organised for me and most of my classmates were dirty and dilapidated, with hosts who only care about money. My room: a sleeping mat instead of a mattress and without even a fan being at 35 degrees with humidity. House full of spiders, broken kitchenware, floor with loose tiles, no drain in the entire house worked, ... disgusting.
Other comments:
The way they assign the level seems a bit random to me. If you stay more than two weeks, it is likely that you will have to repeat content. I complained about this to my first teacher Aline and her answer was to shrug. Luckily, they changed me to another group.
10. Sep. 2018
50.  (25 years)  Singapore
150. Course:  Course No 2 - 2 weeks

Overall Rating

Rating: 4/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 4/5.0

Detailed review
City/place

Rating: 5/5.0

School organization

Rating: 5/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 4/5.0

Social activities

Rating: 1/5.0

Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 4/5.0

Accommodation
Homestay

Rating: 4/5.0

Additional information
Positive aspects of school:
The fact that the classes were done in French unless absolutely needed to be explained in English. It forces you to speak in French and would make you improve faster.
Other comments:
They could create some activities together with the classes to promote a little socialising.
9. Sep. 2018
51.  (18 years)  Estonia
151. Course:  Course No 2 [French] - 2 weeks

Overall Rating

Rating: 4/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 4/5.0

Detailed review
City/place

Rating: 5/5.0

School organization

Rating: 4/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 3/5.0

Social activities

Rating: 3/5.0

Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 4/5.0

Accommodation
Homestay

Rating: 5/5.0

Additional information
Positive aspects of school:
Classmates, teachers
5. Sep. 2018
52.  (22 years)  
152. Course:  Course No 1 [Francese] - 2 weeks

Overall Rating

Rating: 5/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 3/5.0

Detailed review
City/place

Rating: 5/5.0

School organization

Rating: 5/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 3/5.0

Social activities

Rating: 5/5.0

Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 5/5.0

Accommodation
Homestay

Rating: 5/5.0

Additional information
Positive aspects of school:
My teacher.
Insider tips about what future students should not miss:
Nice public transports work perfectly well into the night!
Other comments:
Really interesting, well structured course and perfect book.
4. Sep. 2018
53.  (19 years)  
153. Course:  Course No 3 - 2 weeks

Overall Rating

Rating: 4/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 5/5.0

Detailed review
City/place

Rating: 5/5.0

School organization

Rating: 3/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 3/5.0

Social activities

Rating: 4/5.0

Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 3/5.0

3. Sep. 2018
54.  (25 years)  Japan
154. Course:  C30 - 4 weeks

Overall Rating

Rating: 3/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 3/5.0

Detailed review
City/place

Rating: 3/5.0

School organization

Rating: 3/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 1/5.0

Social activities

Rating: 2/5.0

Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 3/5.0

Accommodation
Homestay

Rating: 3/5.0

Additional information
Positive aspects of school:
Individual lessons are very helpful.
Other comments:
No AC in classrooms, although the office is equipped with AC. Group lessons will not be helpful if you prefer to study at your own pace.
27. Aug. 2018
55.  (20 years)  Spain
155. Course:  Course No 1 - 3 weeks

Overall Rating

Rating: 3/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 4/5.0

Detailed review
City/place

Rating: 5/5.0

School organization

Rating: 3/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 3/5.0

Social activities

Rating: 1/5.0

Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 4/5.0

Accommodation
Homestay

Rating: 5/5.0

Additional information
Positive aspects of school:
Julian, the teacher we had in our first week, interesting texts to read and to talk about, very interactive and maybe the best language teacher ever.
Insider tips about what future students should not miss:
There isn't free activities to get to know all the students who are in the school, so it's not easy to meet people from other classrooms (there is just a free walking tour the first day to the new 20 people +/- who arrive). And the pay activities are the same every week. I suggest to have bbq nights, meeting nights with discounts for the students, volleyball competition... It's not the best language school I've ever gone, even though I had a great time there.
Other comments:
The second teacher we had was awful and we complained to her and to the administration, as her last students did, but the only response we had was to wait a week, the same as what was told to the others. A waste of time and money.
21. Aug. 2018
56.  (40 years)  Austria
156. Course:  Course No 3 - 4 weeks

Overall Rating

Rating: 5/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 5/5.0

Detailed review
City/place

Rating: 5/5.0

School organization

Rating: 5/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 4/5.0

Social activities

Rating: 5/5.0

Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 5/5.0

Additional information
Positive aspects of school:
The teacher's are very good
Other comments:
They should install more ventilators in the rooms. It was very, very hot and there was only 1 ventilator which didn't work very well.
21. Aug. 2018
57.  (18 years)  
157. Course:  Course No. 3 - 2 weeks

Overall Rating

Rating: 4/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 4/5.0

Detailed review
City/place

Rating: 4/5.0

School organization

Rating: 4/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 3/5.0

Social activities

Rating: 4/5.0

Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 3/5.0

Accommodation
Residence France Riviera

Rating: 4/5.0

Additional information
Positive aspects of school:
They organized excursions at a very good price.
Insider tips about what future students should not miss:
If you go alone, choose a residence with communal areas because otherwise you don't get to know anybody.
21. Aug. 2018
58. Giulia (15 years)  
158. Course:  Junior program ( 16- 20 ) - 2 weeks

Overall Rating
---
Value for money

Rating: 3/5.0

Detailed review
City/place

Rating: 5/5.0

School organization

Rating: 3/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 3/5.0

Social activities

Rating: 4/5.0

Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 4/5.0

Accommodation
Homestay

Rating: 4/5.0

13. Aug. 2018
59. Simon (17 years)  
159. Course:  2 Wochen Junior Programme (16 to 20 years old) + 1 Woche Course No. 2 (25 Lekt) - 3 weeks

Overall Rating

Rating: 4/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 5/5.0

Detailed review
City/place

Rating: 3/5.0

School organization

Rating: 4/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 4/5.0

Social activities

Rating: 4/5.0

Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 4/5.0

Accommodation
Homestay

Rating: 4/5.0

28. Jul. 2018
60.  (18 years)  Slovenia
160. Course:  Course No 3 - 2 weeks

Overall Rating

Rating: 5/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 5/5.0

Detailed review
City/place

Rating: 4/5.0

School organization

Rating: 5/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 4/5.0

Social activities

Rating: 3/5.0

Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 5/5.0

Additional information
Positive aspects of school:
The atmosphere
25. Jul. 2018
61.  (25 years)  
161. Course:  Course No 1 - 3 weeks

Overall Rating

Rating: 5/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 5/5.0

Detailed review
City/place

Rating: 5/5.0

School organization

Rating: 5/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 5/5.0

Social activities

Rating: 5/5.0

Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 5/5.0

Accommodation
Homestay

Rating: 5/5.0

18. Jul. 2018
62.  (17 years)  
162. Course:  Course No 1 - 2 weeks

Overall Rating

Rating: 5/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 5/5.0

Detailed review
City/place

Rating: 5/5.0

School organization

Rating: 5/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 4/5.0

Social activities
---
Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 5/5.0

Accommodation
Homestay

Rating: 5/5.0

Additional information
Positive aspects of school:
It differs from a standard school. There are students from all over the world with whom it is interesting and useful to communicate to improve your level. They don't force you to do anything. You do not want, do not do it, but you will only make it worse for yourself.
15. Jul. 2018
63.  (29 years)  Netherlands
163. Course:  Course No 1 - 6 weeks

Overall Rating

Rating: 3/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 3/5.0

Detailed review
City/place

Rating: 4/5.0

School organization

Rating: 2/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 1/5.0

Social activities

Rating: 1/5.0

Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 3/5.0

Accommodation
Shared Flat Nice - Ville

Rating: 1/5.0

Additional information
Positive aspects of school:
The other students were luckily very nice but there were no social activities planned.
Other comments:
Do not book accomodation through the school. The housing is really bad and the school does not help you find other accomodation and only after a lot of discussions was I able to get a refund.
18. Jun. 2018
64. Mariam (20 years)  Georgia
164. Course:  Course No 1 - 2 weeks

Overall Rating

Rating: 3/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 3/5.0

Detailed review
City/place

Rating: 5/5.0

School organization

Rating: 4/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 3/5.0

Social activities

Rating: 1/5.0

Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 2/5.0

Accommodation
Homestay

Rating: 5/5.0

14. Jun. 2018
65.  (22 years)  
165. Course:  Course No 1 [Французский] - 2 weeks

Overall Rating

Rating: 2/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 2/5.0

Detailed review
City/place

Rating: 5/5.0

School organization

Rating: 1/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 1/5.0

Social activities

Rating: 1/5.0

Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 1/5.0

Accommodation
Shared Flat Nice - Ville

Rating: 3/5.0

Additional information
Positive aspects of school:
Location
11. Jun. 2018
66. Lisa (63 years)  
166. Course:  Course No 1 - 2 weeks

Overall Rating

Rating: 3/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 2/5.0

Detailed review
City/place

Rating: 4/5.0

School organization

Rating: 3/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 3/5.0

Social activities

Rating: 4/5.0

Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 2/5.0

22. May. 2018
67.  (45 years)  
167. Course:  Course No 1 - 2 weeks

Overall Rating

Rating: 5/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 5/5.0

Detailed review
City/place

Rating: 5/5.0

School organization

Rating: 5/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 4/5.0

Social activities

Rating: 4/5.0

Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 5/5.0

Additional information
Positive aspects of school:
My daughter and I thought it was fantastic. I want to do this every year. What a good teacher and nice atmosphere. Nice was great too. Thank you for mediating!
Other comments:
Keep the great work up!
30. Apr. 2018
68.  (64 years)  Australia
168. Course:  Course No 2 - 2 weeks

Overall Rating

Rating: 4/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 4/5.0

Detailed review
City/place

Rating: 5/5.0

School organization

Rating: 5/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 4/5.0

Social activities
---
Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 3/5.0

Accommodation
Homestay

Rating: 4/5.0

Additional information
Positive aspects of school:
Good location. There were easy bus routes nearby.
Insider tips about what future students should not miss:
If your accommodation is not up to scratch, don’t put up with it. Mine wasn’t but Giulia in the office fixed up an alternative within 2 days .
Other comments:
The home stay option is the way to go. I learned to speak much more confidently as a result. This for me was better knowledge than from the language school, and at a bargain price.
2. Apr. 2018
69.  (22 years)  Hungary
169. Course:  Course No 1 [French] - 6 weeks

Overall Rating

Rating: 5/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 5/5.0

Detailed review
City/place

Rating: 5/5.0

School organization

Rating: 5/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 4/5.0

Social activities

Rating: 2/5.0

Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 5/5.0

Accommodation
Homestay

Rating: 5/5.0

Additional information
Positive aspects of school:
The teachers and the classmates. The methods of teaching were very effective.
Insider tips about what future students should not miss:
Live with a native French speaker!
20. Mar. 2018
70. Olga (32 years)  Germany
170. Course:  Course No 2 - 2 weeks

Overall Rating

Rating: 5/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 5/5.0

Detailed review
City/place

Rating: 5/5.0

School organization

Rating: 5/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 5/5.0

Social activities

Rating: 5/5.0

Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 5/5.0

Additional information
Other comments:
Actilangue is in my opinion the best school in Nice. The teachers are professional and I really enjoyed the classes.
12. Mar. 2018
71.  (21 years)  
171. Course:  Course No 3 - 6 weeks

Overall Rating

Rating: 4/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 5/5.0

Detailed review
City/place

Rating: 5/5.0

School organization

Rating: 5/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 4/5.0

Social activities

Rating: 1/5.0

Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 3/5.0

Accommodation
Homestay

Rating: 5/5.0

Additional information
Positive aspects of school:
There are few Japanese.
Insider tips about what future students should not miss:
I think you will belong to a class higher or lower than your level.
Other comments:
It is in a good position.
26. Feb. 2018
72. Erika (32 years)  
172. Course:  Course No 2 [Français] - 2 weeks

Overall Rating

Rating: 5/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 4/5.0

Detailed review
City/place

Rating: 4/5.0

School organization

Rating: 5/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 4/5.0

Social activities
---
Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 5/5.0

29. Dec. 2017
73.  (20 years)  Brazil
173. Course:  Course No 3 [French] - 2 weeks

Overall Rating

Rating: 5/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 5/5.0

Detailed review
City/place

Rating: 5/5.0

School organization

Rating: 5/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 5/5.0

Social activities

Rating: 4/5.0

Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 4/5.0

Accommodation
Homestay

Rating: 5/5.0

Additional information
Positive aspects of school:
I really liked the school and all the teachers. It was an amazing experience!
Insider tips about what future students should not miss:
I highly recommend the course number 3 (intensive). The classes in the afternoon were really interesting and helped me to develop more conversation skills.
Other comments:
I expected the classes to be a little more difficult. But the course was great anyways.
12. Sep. 2017
74.  (24 years)  Ukraine
174. Course:  Course No 1 - 2 weeks

Overall Rating

Rating: 5/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 5/5.0

Detailed review
City/place

Rating: 5/5.0

School organization

Rating: 4/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 5/5.0

Social activities

Rating: 4/5.0

Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 4/5.0

Accommodation
Homestay

Rating: 3/5.0

Additional information
Positive aspects of school:
Teacher, organization of lessons, methods of teaching
11. Jul. 2017
75. Pia (52 years)  Finland
175. Course:  Course No 1 - 2 weeks

Overall Rating

Rating: 4/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 4/5.0

Detailed review
City/place

Rating: 5/5.0

School organization

Rating: 5/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 4/5.0

Social activities

Rating: 3/5.0

Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 3/5.0

Accommodation
Homestay

Rating: 4/5.0

10. Jul. 2017
76.  (24 years)  Ukraine
176. Course:  Course No 1 - 2 weeks

Overall Rating

Rating: 5/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 5/5.0

Detailed review
City/place

Rating: 5/5.0

School organization

Rating: 5/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 5/5.0

Social activities

Rating: 5/5.0

Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 5/5.0

Accommodation
Homestay

Rating: 5/5.0

Additional information
Positive aspects of school:
Everything
10. Jul. 2017
77. Shahab (49 years)  Canada
177. Course:  EI20 - 1 week

Overall Rating

Rating: 1/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 1/5.0

Detailed review
City/place

Rating: 5/5.0

School organization

Rating: 1/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 1/5.0

Social activities

Rating: 1/5.0

Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 1/5.0

Additional information
Other comments:
Waste of money and time
6. Jun. 2017
78.  (19 years)  
178. Course:  C25 ((20 clases por semana, 4 lecciones al día) + 1 hora clase particular al día) - 1 week

Overall Rating

Rating: 5/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 5/5.0

Detailed review
City/place

Rating: 5/5.0

School organization

Rating: 5/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 4/5.0

Social activities
---
Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 3/5.0

Accommodation
Homestay

Rating: 5/5.0

Additional information
Positive aspects of school:
The atmosphere.
24. Apr. 2017
79.  (38 years)  
179. Course:  Course No 1 - 2 weeks

Overall Rating

Rating: 5/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 5/5.0

Detailed review
City/place

Rating: 5/5.0

School organization

Rating: 4/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 4/5.0

Social activities

Rating: 5/5.0

Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 5/5.0

Additional information
Positive aspects of school:
Excellent value for money

Save money! Exclusive promotions!
Sign up to benefit from the best language course deals.
Terms & ConditionsPrivacy & CookiesImprintReview and User Content Policies