X

Reviews of France Langue Paris Victor Hugo, Paris, France

Total number of reviews: 92
NOTE: All reviews are authentic. Only students who booked their course through us can publish evaluations here, and only after the end of their programme. These evaluations then are not manipulated in any way, neither by us nor by the school, and can be trusted as honest opinions about personal experiences with the school.

Average Rating

Based on 92 reviews of former students of France Langue Paris Victor Hugo
Overall Rating
France Langue Paris Victor Hugo, Paris, France

Rating: 4.0

4.0 
City

Rating: 4.8

4.8 
Organisation

Rating: 4.1

4.1 
Facilities

Rating: 3.8

3.8 
Social activities

Rating: 3.5

3.5 
Course quality / Progress in language

Rating: 4.1

4.1 
Value for money

Rating: 3.8

3.8 
Accommodation
Homestay

Rating: 4.1

4.1 
Shared Flat

Rating: 4.0

4.0 
other ---

Individual Reviews

France Langue Paris Victor Hugo
4. Aug. 2020
1. Marta (19 years)  
101. Course:  Standard Programme - 2 weeks

Overall Rating

Rating: 4/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 4/5.0

Detailed review
City/place

Rating: 5/5.0

School organization

Rating: 3/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 4/5.0

Social activities

Rating: 3/5.0

Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 4/5.0

18. Sep. 2019
2.  (32 years)  Denmark
102. Course:  Intensive Programme - 1 week

Overall Rating

Rating: 4/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 4/5.0

Detailed review
City/place

Rating: 4/5.0

School organization

Rating: 4/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 3/5.0

Social activities

Rating: 4/5.0

Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 5/5.0

3. Sep. 2019
3. Warme (46 years)  United States
103. Course:  French + Gastronomy: Cooking / Baking - 1 week

Overall Rating

Rating: 5/5.0

Value for money
---
Detailed review
City/place

Rating: 5/5.0

School organization
---
Facilities (library, classrooms)
---
Social activities
---
Quality of teaching / language progress
---
Accommodation
Homestay

Rating: 4/5.0

22. Aug. 2019
4. Xiaofei (26 years)  France
104. Course:  Intensive Programme [French] - 4 weeks

Overall Rating

Rating: 3/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 3/5.0

Detailed review
City/place

Rating: 3/5.0

School organization

Rating: 4/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 3/5.0

Social activities

Rating: 2/5.0

Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 3/5.0

15. Apr. 2019
5. Phililp (66 years)  United States
105. Course:  20 private lessons - 1 week

Overall Rating

Rating: 5/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 5/5.0

Detailed review
City/place

Rating: 5/5.0

School organization

Rating: 5/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)
---
Social activities
---
Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 5/5.0

3. Apr. 2019
6. Sakiko (20 years)  Japan
106. Course:  Standard Programme [フランス語] - 2 weeks

Overall Rating

Rating: 4/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 3/5.0

Detailed review
City/place

Rating: 5/5.0

School organization

Rating: 4/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 4/5.0

Social activities

Rating: 4/5.0

Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 4/5.0

Accommodation
Homestay

Rating: 1/5.0

12. Mar. 2019
7. Hankyung (35 years)  South Korea
107. Course:  Intensive Programme - 6 weeks

Overall Rating

Rating: 5/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 5/5.0

Detailed review
City/place

Rating: 5/5.0

School organization

Rating: 5/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 4/5.0

Social activities

Rating: 4/5.0

Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 5/5.0

10. Nov. 2018
8.  (62 years)  Australia
108. Course:  Standard Programme - 1 week

Overall Rating

Rating: 4/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 3/5.0

Detailed review
City/place

Rating: 5/5.0

School organization

Rating: 5/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 5/5.0

Social activities

Rating: 3/5.0

Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 4/5.0

Additional information
Positive aspects of school:
Friendliness of staff, building, facilities, immersion method of teaching
Insider tips about what future students should not miss:
If you are coming for just one week as we did, its best to realise you will start the course for your level half way through. This was not made clear before we enrolled or when we reached the school itself
Other comments:
Fantastic staff and wonderful atmosphere for an experience of a life time
8. Nov. 2018
9.  (63 years)  Norway
109. Course:  Standard Programme [French] - 1 week

Overall Rating

Rating: 4/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 4/5.0

Detailed review
City/place

Rating: 5/5.0

School organization

Rating: 5/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 3/5.0

Social activities

Rating: 1/5.0

Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 5/5.0

Additional information
Positive aspects of school:
Really good teachers
Other comments:
I am content and would visit again
2. Aug. 2018
10.    
110. Course:  Standard Programme - 1 week

Overall Rating

Rating: 5/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 4/5.0

Detailed review
City/place

Rating: 5/5.0

School organization

Rating: 5/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 5/5.0

Social activities

Rating: 3/5.0

Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 5/5.0

Accommodation
Homestay

Rating: 5/5.0

Additional information
Positive aspects of school:
The classes
30. Jul. 2018
11.  (56 years)  
111. Course:  Super Intensive Programme - 2 weeks

Overall Rating

Rating: 5/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 5/5.0

Detailed review
City/place

Rating: 5/5.0

School organization

Rating: 5/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 3/5.0

Social activities
---
Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 5/5.0

Additional information
Positive aspects of school:
The teachers were outstanding! The location could not be better and the personnel/staff were extremely helpful and kind.
Insider tips about what future students should not miss:
Go to the Bois de Boulogne and visit The Chatelet des Isles!
Other comments:
None, except that Mario and I would like to return in March of 2019!
10. Jul. 2018
12.  (60 years)  
112. Course:  Standard Programme - 4 weeks

Overall Rating

Rating: 4/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 4/5.0

Detailed review
City/place

Rating: 4/5.0

School organization

Rating: 4/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 3/5.0

Social activities

Rating: 4/5.0

Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 4/5.0

Additional information
Positive aspects of school:
Teachers who listen carefully and carefully to the students' remarks.
Insider tips about what future students should not miss:
Anyway, please take full advantage of the opportunity to convey your opinion. Don't say I don't know when I'm listening to my experience.
Other comments:
Activite, which takes place on Monday and Tuesday is a guided walk through the city of Paris. It is free of charge, but the knowledge of the teachers in the guide is rich and can meet knowledge that can not be obtained only by sightseeing. In addition, it is an opportunity to meet students of various levels as well as your classmates.
25. Jun. 2018
13.  (20 years)  Saudi Arabia
113. Course:  Intensive Programme - 4 weeks

Overall Rating

Rating: 3/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 4/5.0

Detailed review
City/place

Rating: 4/5.0

School organization

Rating: 3/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 2/5.0

Social activities

Rating: 4/5.0

Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 4/5.0

Accommodation
Homestay

Rating: 3/5.0

Additional information
Positive aspects of school:
The teachers
12. Jun. 2018
14.  (66 years)  Israel
114. Course:  Standard Programme - 2 weeks

Overall Rating

Rating: 4/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 4/5.0

Detailed review
City/place

Rating: 5/5.0

School organization

Rating: 5/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 5/5.0

Social activities
---
Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 5/5.0

Additional information
Positive aspects of school:
The school's location is excellent and the school itself is small and intimate. The attitude of receptionists supports and nice. The atmosphere in the class is pleasant. The teachers are professional.
Insider tips about what future students should not miss:
I do not have any special tips for the short time I went to school.
Other comments:
My only comment is that, when I arrived on the first day of the school, there was no place in the class that suited my level and I had to join the class at a lower level for a week. The alternative to joining evening studies or moving to a school in the Notre Dame area did not suit me. So, my first week of school did not answer my needs while the second and last week was a success. Hope this will not happen in the future.
4. Jun. 2018
15.  (39 years)  
115. Course:  Intensive Programme [French] - 3 weeks

Overall Rating

Rating: 4/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 5/5.0

Detailed review
City/place

Rating: 5/5.0

School organization

Rating: 4/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 3/5.0

Social activities
---
Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 5/5.0

Accommodation
Homestay

Rating: 4/5.0

Additional information
Positive aspects of school:
I had a great instructor (Thoeniezt).
15. May. 2018
16.  (60 years)  
116. Course:  Standard Programme [French] - 2 weeks

Overall Rating

Rating: 5/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 5/5.0

Detailed review
City/place

Rating: 5/5.0

School organization

Rating: 5/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 4/5.0

Social activities

Rating: 4/5.0

Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 5/5.0

Accommodation
Homestay

Rating: 4/5.0

Additional information
Positive aspects of school:
The teachers capability to adjust to this very "flexible" type of class. Admirable!
16. Apr. 2018
17.  (52 years)  
117. Course:  Intensive Programme [French] - 2 weeks

Overall Rating

Rating: 4/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 5/5.0

Detailed review
City/place

Rating: 5/5.0

School organization

Rating: 4/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 4/5.0

Social activities
---
Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 5/5.0

Additional information
Positive aspects of school:
I loved that it was all in French, even though that was difficult. It was what I needed. The professors were patient, knowledgeable and kind.
Other comments:
I would definitely go back!
4. Apr. 2018
18. Rachel (30 years)  United Kingdom
118. Course:  Standard Course - 2 weeks

Overall Rating

Rating: 5/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 4/5.0

Detailed review
City/place

Rating: 5/5.0

School organization

Rating: 5/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 4/5.0

Social activities

Rating: 3/5.0

Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 5/5.0

4. Apr. 2018
19.  (43 years)  
119. Course:  Standard Programme - 1 week

Overall Rating

Rating: 4/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 5/5.0

Detailed review
City/place

Rating: 5/5.0

School organization

Rating: 3/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 4/5.0

Social activities

Rating: 2/5.0

Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 5/5.0

Additional information
Positive aspects of school:
Quality of teacher, atmosphere of class
Insider tips about what future students should not miss:
It was good that there was no Japanese, and the area was safe.
Other comments:
The atmosphere in the class was great, there were Japanese people at the reception but they were not very kind but there was no problem
21. Aug. 2017
20.  (48 years)  Italy
120. Course:  Intensive Programme - 2 weeks

Overall Rating

Rating: 4/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 4/5.0

Detailed review
City/place

Rating: 5/5.0

School organization

Rating: 4/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 4/5.0

Social activities

Rating: 4/5.0

Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 5/5.0

Accommodation
Homestay

Rating: 4/5.0

Additional information
Positive aspects of school:
The school is well organised, class was not too big, there was a qualified teacher, and the staff were hospitable.
9. Aug. 2017
21. Saul (20 years)  Spain
121. Course:  Intensive Programme - 4 weeks

Overall Rating

Rating: 4/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 4/5.0

Detailed review
City/place

Rating: 5/5.0

School organization

Rating: 5/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 4/5.0

Social activities

Rating: 4/5.0

Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 5/5.0

1. Aug. 2017
22.  (51 years)  
122. Course:  1 week

Overall Rating

Rating: 3/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 3/5.0

Detailed review
City/place

Rating: 5/5.0

School organization

Rating: 3/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 4/5.0

Social activities
---
Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 3/5.0

Additional information
Positive aspects of school:
Location
Other comments:
Front desk was indifferent and unorganized.
11. Jul. 2017
23.  (40 years)  Thailand
123. Course:  Intensive Programme - 1 week

Overall Rating

Rating: 4/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 4/5.0

Detailed review
City/place

Rating: 5/5.0

School organization

Rating: 4/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 4/5.0

Social activities

Rating: 4/5.0

Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 4/5.0

Additional information
Positive aspects of school:
Teacher.
Insider tips about what future students should not miss:
Stay more than one week.
Other comments:
All perfect.
14. Feb. 2017
24.  (73 years)  
124. Course:  Standard Programme - 1 week

Overall Rating

Rating: 2/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 2/5.0

Detailed review
City/place

Rating: 5/5.0

School organization

Rating: 5/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 5/5.0

Social activities

Rating: 1/5.0

Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 2/5.0

Additional information
Positive aspects of school:
Their facilities, location and administrative staff are wonderful. My first teacher was great--Dennis. We had him for only 1 1/2 days, however. They're activities on paper seem wonderful (if one can actually take part in them). My second teacher, Caroline, scheduled for 3 days was another story. See below.
Insider tips about what future students should not miss:
If you go to activities, make sure you know the exact meeting point. Also, make sure you are put in a class that fits your needs and abilities.
Other comments:
If I had Dennis as the teacher for the entire week, I would probably sign up again. The problem with Caroline is that she let one student monopolize the conversation for 2 hours of the class. I felt like that student was getting a private lesson and the rest of us were just subjected to listening to the student go on and on about topics that interested her. For me it felt like torture, so I did not attend my last day of class because I didn't want to be subjected to that again. Also, for activities the meeting point should be made absolutely clear. I went to an activity--no one showed up. Maybe I was not at the exact meeting point. I don't know.
19. Dec. 2016
25.  (23 years)  United Kingdom
125. Course:  Intensive Programme - 8 weeks

Overall Rating

Rating: 5/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 4/5.0

Detailed review
City/place

Rating: 5/5.0

School organization

Rating: 4/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 4/5.0

Social activities

Rating: 3/5.0

Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 5/5.0

Accommodation
Homestay

Rating: 5/5.0

Additional information
Positive aspects of school:
The teaching staff
22. Jul. 2015
26. Aya (20 years)  
126. Course:  Intensive Programme - 3 weeks

Overall Rating

Rating: 4/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 4/5.0

Detailed review
City/place

Rating: 5/5.0

School organization

Rating: 4/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 3/5.0

Social activities

Rating: 3/5.0

Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 4/5.0

Accommodation
Residence CISP Ravel or Kellermann

Rating: 4/5.0

Additional information
Insider tips about what future students should not miss:
Do not be shy to ask if you want to be transferred to a different group if you are not happy with the level of your current group.
6. Feb. 2015
27.  (66 years)  France
127. Course:  Accelerated Programme - 2 weeks

Overall Rating

Rating: 4/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 4/5.0

Detailed review
City/place

Rating: 5/5.0

School organization

Rating: 5/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 3/5.0

Social activities
---
Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 4/5.0

Additional information
Positive aspects of school:
Reception very helpful in tailoring program to my needs. Morning professor (same each day) was excellent as was the one who taught the "actualités" (current events). Others less so.
Other comments:
Heating issues in classrooms (too hot). No one organizes the rooms - too many chairs and tables in some to even move about.
24. Aug. 2014
28.  (36 years)  Germany
128. Course:  Intensive Programme - 2 weeks

Overall Rating

Rating: 4/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 4/5.0

Detailed review
City/place

Rating: 4/5.0

School organization

Rating: 4/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 4/5.0

Social activities

Rating: 2/5.0

Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 4/5.0

Additional information
Positive aspects of school:
Good teachers, very welcoming staff
Other comments:
It´s a good school, but the free time activities should be compatible with the classes
19. May. 2014
29.  (41 years)  Japan
129. Course:  Foundation Programme - 2 weeks

Overall Rating

Rating: 5/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 5/5.0

Detailed review
City/place

Rating: 5/5.0

School organization

Rating: 5/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 5/5.0

Social activities

Rating: 5/5.0

Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 5/5.0

Accommodation
Homestay

Rating: 5/5.0

Additional information
Positive aspects of school:
the teaching method
Insider tips about what future students should not miss:
you should study in advance at home. speak out whenever you have a chance.
28. Jan. 2014
30.  (28 years)  
130. Course:  Foundation Programme - 2 weeks

Overall Rating

Rating: 4/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 4/5.0

Detailed review
City/place

Rating: 5/5.0

School organization

Rating: 4/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 4/5.0

Social activities

Rating: 5/5.0

Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 5/5.0

Additional information
Positive aspects of school:
Activity
Insider tips about what future students should not miss:
Go to all that the school offers
Other comments:
The first week was a nightmare teacher, first week - waste of money, the remaining two weeks we had an excellent teacher!
4. Aug. 2013
31.  (24 years)  
131. Course:  Intensive 26 / Extra-Intensive Programme - 2 weeks

Overall Rating

Rating: 4/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 3/5.0

Detailed review
City/place

Rating: 4/5.0

School organization

Rating: 4/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 4/5.0

Social activities

Rating: 3/5.0

Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 4/5.0

Accommodation
Cité Universitaire Internationale de Paris

Rating: 3/5.0

Additional information
Positive aspects of school:
The quality of teaching
12. Feb. 2013
32.  (30 years)  
132. Course:  Intensive 30 / Accelerated Programme - 2 weeks

Overall Rating

Rating: 4/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 4/5.0

Detailed review
City/place

Rating: 4/5.0

School organization

Rating: 4/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 3/5.0

Social activities

Rating: 5/5.0

Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 4/5.0

Accommodation
Homestay

Rating: 3/5.0

Additional information
Positive aspects of school:
Plenty of activities, many services for free.
Other comments:
Unfortunately, the phonetics laboratory was closed. The quality of the teachers was very different.
14. Dec. 2012
33.  (64 years)  
133. Course:  Intensive 30 / Accelerated Programme - 1 week

Overall Rating

Rating: 4/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 3/5.0

Detailed review
City/place

Rating: 4/5.0

School organization

Rating: 4/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 4/5.0

Social activities

Rating: 3/5.0

Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 4/5.0

Accommodation
Homestay

Rating: 3/5.0

Additional information
Positive aspects of school:
The teachers were professional, entertaining, enthusiastic.
Insider tips about what future students should not miss:
The intensive course starts after lunch and continues into the early evening. It prevents attendance to many social events which are in the afternoon, at the same time as the teaching and in the evening, after several hours of teaching when you need food and a rest.
Other comments:
The course was a serious challenge but an enjoyable experience. I learned quite a lot and was motivated to continue study when I got home.
23. Oct. 2012
34.  (33 years)  
134. Course:  Intensive Course 20 - 2 weeks

Overall Rating

Rating: 4/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 4/5.0

Detailed review
City/place

Rating: 5/5.0

School organization

Rating: 3/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 4/5.0

Social activities

Rating: 4/5.0

Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 3/5.0

Accommodation
International Residence (CISP) or Kellermann

Rating: 4/5.0

Additional information
Positive aspects of school:
the cleanliness of the premises, the teachers availability, and their ability to involve always all the students in the lesson.
Insider tips about what future students should not miss:
there are no lessons on Monday morning
Other comments:
Positive Rating, very well organized excursions
15. Oct. 2012
35.  (37 years)  
135. Course:  Intensive course 30 - 1 week

Overall Rating

Rating: 4/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 5/5.0

Detailed review
City/place

Rating: 5/5.0

School organization

Rating: 5/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 3/5.0

Social activities

Rating: 4/5.0

Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 5/5.0

Additional information
Positive aspects of school:
Highly qualified teachers
17. Sep. 2012
36. Jose María (39 years)  Spain
136. Course:  Intensive course 30 - 4 weeks

Overall Rating

Rating: 4/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 4/5.0

Detailed review
City/place

Rating: 5/5.0

School organization

Rating: 4/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 4/5.0

Social activities

Rating: 3/5.0

Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 4/5.0

13. Sep. 2012
37. Guzel (19 years)  
137. Course:  Intensive Course 20 - 2 weeks

Overall Rating

Rating: 5/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 4/5.0

Detailed review
City/place

Rating: 5/5.0

School organization

Rating: 4/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 4/5.0

Social activities

Rating: 4/5.0

Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 5/5.0

Accommodation
Homestay

Rating: 5/5.0

11. Sep. 2012
38.  (41 years)  Portugal
138. Course:  Intensive course 30 - 8 weeks

Overall Rating

Rating: 1/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 1/5.0

Detailed review
City/place

Rating: 5/5.0

School organization

Rating: 2/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 1/5.0

Social activities

Rating: 2/5.0

Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 1/5.0

Additional information
Positive aspects of school:
Contact with other cultures.
Insider tips about what future students should not miss:
The school does not privilege the needs of each student and places students in groups where there is space.
Other comments:
There are schools with a better quality and a better price in France.
6. Sep. 2012
39. Valeriya (22 years)  
139. Course:  Intensive Course 20 - 2 weeks

Overall Rating

Rating: 4/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 4/5.0

Detailed review
City/place

Rating: 5/5.0

School organization

Rating: 5/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 5/5.0

Social activities

Rating: 4/5.0

Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 3/5.0

Accommodation
Cité Universitaire Internationale de Paris

Rating: 4/5.0

29. Aug. 2012
40.  (20 years)  
140. Course:  Intensive course 30 - 2 weeks

Overall Rating

Rating: 5/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 3/5.0

Detailed review
City/place

Rating: 5/5.0

School organization

Rating: 4/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 5/5.0

Social activities

Rating: 4/5.0

Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 5/5.0

Accommodation
Maison des Lycéennes

Rating: 5/5.0

Additional information
Positive aspects of school:
the selection of topics on which ​​the lesson would have been held, the seriousness of the teachers and the wide range of afternoon workshops
27. Aug. 2012
41.  (24 years)  Spain
141. Course:  Intensive Course 20 - 1 week

Overall Rating

Rating: 3/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 2/5.0

Detailed review
City/place

Rating: 5/5.0

School organization

Rating: 4/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 3/5.0

Social activities

Rating: 4/5.0

Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 2/5.0

Accommodation
Maison des Lycéennes

Rating: 4/5.0

Additional information
Positive aspects of school:
The social activities.
21. Aug. 2012
42.  (22 years)  Spain
142. Course:  Intensive Course 20 - 3 weeks

Overall Rating

Rating: 4/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 4/5.0

Detailed review
City/place

Rating: 5/5.0

School organization

Rating: 3/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 3/5.0

Social activities

Rating: 2/5.0

Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 4/5.0

Additional information
Positive aspects of school:
Teachers were really friendly and this helped me so much because I was alone in the city. They made classes wonderful and I enjoyed them.
5. Jul. 2012
43.  (29 years)  Netherlands
143. Course:  Intensive Course 20 - 2 weeks

Overall Rating

Rating: 4/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 4/5.0

Detailed review
City/place

Rating: 5/5.0

School organization

Rating: 4/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 3/5.0

Social activities

Rating: 3/5.0

Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 4/5.0

Additional information
Positive aspects of school:
that the focus is on conversation
Insider tips about what future students should not miss:
try and look for a rental appartment yourself it may be nicer and cheaper
16. Jan. 2012
44.  (18 years)  Sweden
144. Course:  Intensive Course 20 - 2 weeks

Overall Rating

Rating: 4/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 5/5.0

Detailed review
City/place

Rating: 5/5.0

School organization

Rating: 4/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 4/5.0

Social activities

Rating: 3/5.0

Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 5/5.0

Accommodation
Homestay

Rating: 5/5.0

Additional information
Positive aspects of school:
The teachers!
Insider tips about what future students should not miss:
Musee d
Other comments:
Great service, great professors, great classmates!
7. Dec. 2011
45.    Poland
145. Course:  Intensive Course 20 - 1 week

Overall Rating

Rating: 4/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 4/5.0

Detailed review
City/place

Rating: 4/5.0

School organization

Rating: 4/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 5/5.0

Social activities

Rating: 4/5.0

Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 4/5.0

Accommodation
Homestay

Rating: 4/5.0

Additional information
Positive aspects of school:
free labratory, excursion with teacher
Other comments:
lessons should be more intensive(too much chating among teacher and students during lesson), better punctuality
5. Dec. 2011
46.  (21 years)  Italy
146. Course:  Intensive Course 20 - 2 weeks

Overall Rating

Rating: 3/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 4/5.0

Detailed review
City/place

Rating: 5/5.0

School organization

Rating: 4/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 3/5.0

Social activities

Rating: 3/5.0

Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 4/5.0

Additional information
Positive aspects of school:
The quality of teaching
Other comments:
The only problem is that in a class there are levels too much differents
21. Nov. 2011
47. Caroline (42 years)  Iceland
147. Course:  Intensive course 30 - 1 week

Overall Rating

Rating: 4/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 4/5.0

Detailed review
City/place

Rating: 5/5.0

School organization
---
Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 4/5.0

Social activities

Rating: 2/5.0

Quality of teaching / language progress
---
Accommodation
Homestay

Rating: 5/5.0

Additional information
Other comments:
i was not informed beforehand that there were no classes on november 1st, eventhough I had e-mailed the school in advance for an itenary. I also did not like the topics the teacher covered on Wed and Thur morning and I asked for a transfer of class for the last day on Friday. On wed we discussed "pain" la douleur. This was bad enough for 4 hours, but on Thursday it was the same thing. How boring!!! All other classes were fine and the teachers were nice and friendly.
9. Oct. 2011
48.  (21 years)  
148. Course:  Intensive Course 20 - 1 week

Overall Rating

Rating: 2/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 2/5.0

Detailed review
City/place

Rating: 5/5.0

School organization

Rating: 4/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 4/5.0

Social activities

Rating: 3/5.0

Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 4/5.0

Accommodation
Homestay

Rating: 2/5.0

Additional information
Positive aspects of school:
It was in a very good area, easy to find. The staff were all very nice and helpful.
Insider tips about what future students should not miss:
It is a general course and not exactly tailored to what you require.
Other comments:
I thought the course would be a little more suited to my needs. At the beginning of the week, I filled in a questionnaire to state what I needed help with. These points were never covered.
29. Sep. 2011
49. Asami (26 years)  
149. Course:  Intensive Course 20 - 2 weeks

Overall Rating

Rating: 4/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 5/5.0

Detailed review
City/place

Rating: 5/5.0

School organization

Rating: 4/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 3/5.0

Social activities

Rating: 3/5.0

Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 2/5.0

Accommodation
Homestay

Rating: 5/5.0

26. Sep. 2011
50. Regina (40 years)  
150. Course:  Intensive Course 20 - 2 weeks

Overall Rating

Rating: 3/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 3/5.0

Detailed review
City/place

Rating: 5/5.0

School organization

Rating: 3/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 3/5.0

Social activities
---
Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 4/5.0

29. Aug. 2011
51.  (29 years)  
151. Course:  Intensive Course 20 - 3 weeks

Overall Rating

Rating: 4/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 5/5.0

Detailed review
City/place

Rating: 5/5.0

School organization

Rating: 3/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 3/5.0

Social activities

Rating: 2/5.0

Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 4/5.0

Accommodation
Homestay

Rating: 4/5.0

Additional information
Positive aspects of school:
When they finally found the right level for me - which was hard work and took a whole week - I was very happy with the teacher.
Insider tips about what future students should not miss:
The book that costs 25 euros and it can be found used for much less.
Other comments:
Having attended other language schools, I feel they lack options for organised activities based on culture, literature, art history, etc...
22. Aug. 2011
52.  (24 years)  
152. Course:  Intensive Course 20 - 2 weeks

Overall Rating

Rating: 3/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 3/5.0

Detailed review
City/place

Rating: 4/5.0

School organization

Rating: 3/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 4/5.0

Social activities

Rating: 2/5.0

Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 2/5.0

Accommodation
Homestay

Rating: 4/5.0

Additional information
Positive aspects of school:
GOOD: - facilities, location of school BAD: - lessons are very relaxed and slow, not recommendable for someone who wants to study more intense - school is highly booked during summer, therefore courses are often only available in the afternoon - host families vary a lot, some care very little about the students
17. Aug. 2011
53. Lucrezia (20 years)  
153. Course:  Intensive Course 20 - 1 week

Overall Rating

Rating: 4/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 5/5.0

Detailed review
City/place

Rating: 4/5.0

School organization

Rating: 4/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 4/5.0

Social activities

Rating: 2/5.0

Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 3/5.0

17. Aug. 2011
54. Alba (22 years)  Spain
154. Course:  Intensive Course 20 - 3 weeks

Overall Rating

Rating: 4/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 4/5.0

Detailed review
City/place

Rating: 5/5.0

School organization

Rating: 5/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 4/5.0

Social activities

Rating: 4/5.0

Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 4/5.0

10. Aug. 2011
55. Fern (28 years)  France
155. Course:  Intensive Course 20 - 1 week

Overall Rating

Rating: 4/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 4/5.0

Detailed review
City/place

Rating: 5/5.0

School organization

Rating: 4/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 4/5.0

Social activities

Rating: 3/5.0

Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 4/5.0

3. Aug. 2011
56. Sofya (19 years)  
156. Course:  Intensive Course 20 - 1 week

Overall Rating

Rating: 5/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 4/5.0

Detailed review
City/place

Rating: 5/5.0

School organization

Rating: 4/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 5/5.0

Social activities

Rating: 5/5.0

Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 5/5.0

2. Aug. 2011
57.  (19 years)  
157. Course:  Intensive Course 20 - 1 week

Overall Rating

Rating: 5/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 3/5.0

Detailed review
City/place

Rating: 5/5.0

School organization

Rating: 4/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 4/5.0

Social activities
---
Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 5/5.0

Additional information
Positive aspects of school:
The tutors and their willingness, ability and readiness to work with foreign students.
Insider tips about what future students should not miss:
Get an ISIC card
27. Jul. 2011
58.  (39 years)  
158. Course:  Intensive Course 20 - 2 weeks

Overall Rating

Rating: 3/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 3/5.0

Detailed review
City/place

Rating: 5/5.0

School organization

Rating: 4/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 3/5.0

Social activities

Rating: 3/5.0

Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 4/5.0

Additional information
Positive aspects of school:
The teacher Poline was young but very well-prepared for teaching.
Insider tips about what future students should not miss:
In two weeks of 20 lessons you can make little progress, the courses are not very intensive. They follow a text divided into sections and in a week we only covered a few pronouns, 2 verb forms and a little vocabulary... but after all, the time was very short!
25. Jul. 2011
59. Karolina (26 years)  Switzerland
159. Course:  Intensive Course 30 - 2 weeks

Overall Rating

Rating: 4/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 3/5.0

Detailed review
City/place

Rating: 5/5.0

School organization

Rating: 4/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 4/5.0

Social activities

Rating: 4/5.0

Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 3/5.0

Accommodation
Homestay

Rating: 4/5.0

Additional information
Other comments:
The classes were too big. The level of the students is very different and it makes it difficult to make fast progress if there are too many students in each class.
18. Jul. 2011
60.  (33 years)  
160. Course:  Intensive Course 20 - 1 week

Overall Rating

Rating: 4/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 5/5.0

Detailed review
City/place

Rating: 5/5.0

School organization

Rating: 5/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 5/5.0

Social activities

Rating: 2/5.0

Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 4/5.0

Accommodation
Homestay - Partial Half Board (5 dinners)

Rating: 4/5.0

Additional information
Positive aspects of school:
Everything was wonderful. The instructor, the staff, the location of the school is beautiful.
Insider tips about what future students should not miss:
There is a delicious Patisserie near the school called Charles T????? Their mini sandwiches are delicious as are their pastries.
Other comments:
My host was absolutely wonderful. Very welcoming, friendly and encouraging of conversation. The only problem was that it was a bit far from the school. It took about 45 minutes to arrive via the RER and Metro. Otherwise it was perfect. The class was also great. Our teacher Pauline taught us a lot of new phrases we could use in conversation. The only thing I would suggest is to have more time during the class devoted to students conversing with each other in oral exercises so we can practice more during the class. Also maybe more social activities for students to take part in. Thank you so much for a wonderful experience!
2. Jun. 2011
61.  (25 years)  
161. Course:  Intensive Course 20 - 3 weeks

Overall Rating

Rating: 4/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 4/5.0

Detailed review
City/place

Rating: 5/5.0

School organization

Rating: 4/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 4/5.0

Social activities

Rating: 4/5.0

Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 5/5.0

Accommodation
Homestay

Rating: 4/5.0

Additional information
Positive aspects of school:
Teachers were creative and professional. Even at the absolute beginner level, classes were conducted 99.5% in French. The location was also quite good, in a fairly upscale neighborhood, convenient to reach by public transportation, and within walking distance of the Arc de Triomphe.
Insider tips about what future students should not miss:
I did not take part in any of the outings, but they had several available and I heard good things about them from fellow students. Staying in a host family was slightly expensive, but a good choice because I had the opportunity to practice what I was learning at home and to see that I really was progressing. Although Paris is wonderful, if I were to do it again I would try to stay in a much smaller city, where less English would be spoken. Even though I was in a French-speaking country, it was often difficult to practice French because so many people speak English.
Other comments:
I wish that there were more opportunities in class to practice pronunciation. After 3 weeks, I can understand quite a bit of French, but my speaking abilities are comparatively very low.
30. May. 2011
62. Davide (23 years)  Italy
162. Course:  Intensive course 30 - 8 weeks

Overall Rating

Rating: 5/5.0

Value for money
---
Detailed review
City/place

Rating: 5/5.0

School organization

Rating: 5/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 4/5.0

Social activities
---
Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 5/5.0

Accommodation
Homestay

Rating: 5/5.0

16. Feb. 2011
63. Olusomi (24 years)  United Kingdom
163. Course:  Intensive Course 20 - 3 weeks

Overall Rating

Rating: 5/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 5/5.0

Detailed review
City/place

Rating: 4/5.0

School organization
---
Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 5/5.0

Social activities

Rating: 5/5.0

Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 5/5.0

Accommodation
Homestay

Rating: 5/5.0

13. Dec. 2010
64.  (34 years)  
164. Course:  Intensive Course 20 - 1 week

Overall Rating

Rating: 5/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 5/5.0

Detailed review
City/place

Rating: 5/5.0

School organization

Rating: 5/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 4/5.0

Social activities

Rating: 5/5.0

Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 5/5.0

Additional information
Positive aspects of school:
The helpfulness of the staff, the teacher was helpful also and engaged the whole class, the topics were very interactive and the class friendly and open. The location was perfect.
6. Dec. 2010
65.  (21 years)  
165. Course:  Intensive Course 20 - 1 week

Overall Rating

Rating: 4/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 2/5.0

Detailed review
City/place

Rating: 5/5.0

School organization

Rating: 4/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 4/5.0

Social activities

Rating: 4/5.0

Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 3/5.0

Additional information
Positive aspects of school:
Chatting with the other kids of the class, with whom I had a wonderful and interesting cultural exchange, as each of them was of a nationality different from mine.
Insider tips about what future students should not miss:
I believe that future participants should be aware that such a trip must have absolutely the minimum duration of a month. Having done unfortunately only a week I realized that it is too little.
18. Oct. 2010
66.  (37 years)  France
166. Course:  Intensive Course 20 - 2 weeks

Overall Rating

Rating: 4/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 3/5.0

Detailed review
City/place

Rating: 5/5.0

School organization

Rating: 4/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 2/5.0

Social activities

Rating: 5/5.0

Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 5/5.0

Additional information
Positive aspects of school:
Professor was great.
27. Sep. 2010
67. Nancy (35 years)  
167. Course:  Intensive Course 20 - 16 weeks

Overall Rating

Rating: 3/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 3/5.0

Detailed review
City/place

Rating: 5/5.0

School organization

Rating: 4/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 4/5.0

Social activities

Rating: 4/5.0

Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 3/5.0

12. Sep. 2010
68. Laura (19 years)  
168. Course:  Intensive Course 20 - 3 weeks

Overall Rating

Rating: 4/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 3/5.0

Detailed review
City/place

Rating: 5/5.0

School organization

Rating: 4/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 4/5.0

Social activities

Rating: 4/5.0

Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 5/5.0

7. Sep. 2010
69.  (23 years)  Italy
169. Course:  Intensive Course 20 - 3 weeks

Overall Rating

Rating: 3/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 4/5.0

Detailed review
City/place

Rating: 4/5.0

School organization

Rating: 2/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 3/5.0

Social activities

Rating: 4/5.0

Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 3/5.0

Accommodation
Homestay

Rating: 5/5.0

Additional information
Positive aspects of school:
Internationalism
Insider tips about what future students should not miss:
There is a phonetic lab, it's free and it's not available for a short period in August!
1. Sep. 2010
70. Licia (18 years)  
170. Course:  Intensive Course 20 - 2 weeks

Overall Rating

Rating: 4/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 4/5.0

Detailed review
City/place

Rating: 5/5.0

School organization

Rating: 3/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 4/5.0

Social activities

Rating: 4/5.0

Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 4/5.0

Accommodation
Homestay - Partial Half Board (5 dinners)

Rating: 5/5.0

1. Sep. 2010
71. Alba (16 years)  
171. Course:  Intensive Course 20 - 2 weeks

Overall Rating

Rating: 4/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 4/5.0

Detailed review
City/place

Rating: 4/5.0

School organization

Rating: 3/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 4/5.0

Social activities

Rating: 4/5.0

Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 4/5.0

Accommodation
Homestay - Partial Half Board (5 dinners)

Rating: 5/5.0

Additional information
Insider tips about what future students should not miss:
Basic knowledge of the language
24. Aug. 2010
72.  (60 years)  
172. Course:  Intensive Course 20 - 1 week

Overall Rating

Rating: 5/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 5/5.0

Detailed review
City/place

Rating: 5/5.0

School organization

Rating: 5/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 5/5.0

Social activities

Rating: 5/5.0

Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 5/5.0

Additional information
Positive aspects of school:
Right off the Metro. My instructor was exceptional, and I look forward to returning to her class in the future. I wouldn't go anywhere else.
Insider tips about what future students should not miss:
Social Activities
Other comments:
Truly immersion at its best.
23. Aug. 2010
73.  (22 years)  France
173. Course:  Intensive Course 20 - 2 weeks

Overall Rating

Rating: 5/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 4/5.0

Detailed review
City/place

Rating: 5/5.0

School organization

Rating: 5/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 4/5.0

Social activities

Rating: 4/5.0

Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 5/5.0

Accommodation
Homestay

Rating: 5/5.0

Additional information
Positive aspects of school:
Classmates and teaching.
12. Aug. 2010
74. Ana Isabel (42 years)  
174. Course:  Intensive Course 20 - 1 week

Overall Rating

Rating: 4/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 4/5.0

Detailed review
City/place

Rating: 5/5.0

School organization

Rating: 5/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 3/5.0

Social activities

Rating: 3/5.0

Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 3/5.0

2. Aug. 2010
75.  (52 years)  Canada
175. Course:  Intensive Course 20 - 3 weeks

Overall Rating

Rating: 2/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 2/5.0

Detailed review
City/place

Rating: 4/5.0

School organization

Rating: 2/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 1/5.0

Social activities

Rating: 5/5.0

Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 4/5.0

Additional information
Positive aspects of school:
The office staff was very helpful and should be commended for their interest in the students and the program.rnMy teacher worked hard at delivering a strong program with the varied levels of ability of the students that she had to instruct. I did like the weekend excursion to the Loire Valley and I think that Claire, who organized it, did a fabulous job and Vincent was also very friendly and helpful during the weekend excursion. Thank you to both of you.
Insider tips about what future students should not miss:
Be careful when selecting host families.rnI heard a lot of negative reports with the quality of food and lodgings that are provided to the students. I think that the host families take advantage of young students who will not complain like older students would. Too bad because this is often the students first experience away from home and parents want it to be pleasant and successful for their children. If it is not a pleasant experience, then people will not recommend to others or want to repeat their studies. Plus, you should receive good value for the money that you are paying.
Other comments:
My classroom was next to the street and noisy and it was very very hot. We had to keep the windows closed so that we could hear each other and the teacher speak. It was an unpleasant learning environment being so hot. The ceiling fans did not help enough and I would often leave the class with a headache. A more appropriate building with air conditioning would be most considerate since these courses are not free. I would not attend in the summer again because of the heat and I would not choose this school at SFax because of the noise level
20. Jul. 2010
76.  (22 years)  
176. Course:  Intensive Course - 1 week

Overall Rating

Rating: 4/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 4/5.0

Detailed review
City/place

Rating: 4/5.0

School organization

Rating: 5/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 4/5.0

Social activities

Rating: 3/5.0

Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 4/5.0

12. Jul. 2010
77.  (26 years)  
177. Course:  Intensive Course - 3 weeks

Overall Rating

Rating: 5/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 4/5.0

Detailed review
City/place

Rating: 5/5.0

School organization

Rating: 5/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 4/5.0

Social activities

Rating: 3/5.0

Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 4/5.0

Additional information
Positive aspects of school:
organization,kindness and personal competence.
26. Apr. 2010
78. Davide (29 years)  
178. Course:  Intensive Course 20 - 1 week

Overall Rating

Rating: 4/5.0

Value for money
---
Detailed review
City/place

Rating: 5/5.0

School organization

Rating: 4/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 4/5.0

Social activities

Rating: 3/5.0

Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 4/5.0

8. Mar. 2010
79.  (22 years)  Canada
179. Course:  Intensive Course 20 - 5 weeks

Overall Rating

Rating: 4/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 4/5.0

Detailed review
City/place

Rating: 5/5.0

School organization

Rating: 4/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 4/5.0

Social activities

Rating: 3/5.0

Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 4/5.0

Accommodation
Homestay

Rating: 4/5.0

Additional information
Positive aspects of school:
Excellent teachers and meeting students from all over the world
Insider tips about what future students should not miss:
Most museums offer free admission with the school student card for students under 26. Even for non EU citizens!
28. Dec. 2009
80.  (24 years)  France
180. Course:  Intensive Long-term - 12 weeks

Overall Rating

Rating: 5/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 5/5.0

Detailed review
City/place

Rating: 5/5.0

School organization

Rating: 5/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 4/5.0

Social activities

Rating: 3/5.0

Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 5/5.0

Additional information
Positive aspects of school:
My Teacher Marion!!
Other comments:
I learned so much after studying for 3 months at France Langue , I love the school so i am going to study for another 3 months to reach a high level of French!
16. Nov. 2009
81. Art (25 years)  
181. Course:  Intensive course 30 - 7 weeks

Overall Rating

Rating: 4/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 4/5.0

Detailed review
City/place

Rating: 5/5.0

School organization

Rating: 4/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 3/5.0

Social activities
---
Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 5/5.0

Accommodation
Homestay

Rating: 4/5.0

19. Oct. 2009
82. Carlos Manuel (25 years)  
182. Course:  Intensive course 20 - 3 weeks

Overall Rating

Rating: 4/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 2/5.0

Detailed review
City/place

Rating: 5/5.0

School organization

Rating: 4/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 4/5.0

Social activities

Rating: 4/5.0

Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 4/5.0

24. Aug. 2009
83. Larissa Fagundes (22 years)  Brazil
183. Course:  Intensive course 30 - 4 weeks

Overall Rating

Rating: 5/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 5/5.0

Detailed review
City/place

Rating: 5/5.0

School organization

Rating: 4/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 5/5.0

Social activities

Rating: 5/5.0

Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 4/5.0

Accommodation
Homestay

Rating: 5/5.0

Additional information
Insider tips about what future students should not miss:
guided tours
19. Jun. 2009
84. Marco (27 years)  
184. Course:  Intensive course 30 - 1 week

Overall Rating

Rating: 5/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 3/5.0

Detailed review
City/place

Rating: 5/5.0

School organization

Rating: 5/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 4/5.0

Social activities
---
Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 5/5.0

17. Feb. 2009
85. Raffael (25 years)  
185. Course:  Intensive course 30 - 4 weeks

Overall Rating

Rating: 4/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 4/5.0

Detailed review
City/place

Rating: 5/5.0

School organization

Rating: 4/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 3/5.0

Social activities

Rating: 4/5.0

Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 4/5.0

15. Nov. 2008
86. Juan Carlos (19 years)  
186. Course:  Intensive course 20 - 2 weeks

Overall Rating

Rating: 5/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 4/5.0

Detailed review
City/place

Rating: 5/5.0

School organization

Rating: 5/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 4/5.0

Social activities

Rating: 4/5.0

Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 5/5.0

Accommodation
Homestay

Rating: 5/5.0

15. Nov. 2008
87. Alessio (24 years)  
187. Course:  Intensive course 20 - 3 weeks

Overall Rating

Rating: 4/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 3/5.0

Detailed review
City/place

Rating: 5/5.0

School organization

Rating: 4/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 4/5.0

Social activities

Rating: 3/5.0

Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 4/5.0

Accommodation
Homestay

Rating: 3/5.0

15. Nov. 2008
88.  (35 years)  
188. Course:  Intensive course 20 - 1 week

Overall Rating

Rating: 4/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 4/5.0

Detailed review
City/place

Rating: 5/5.0

School organization

Rating: 4/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 4/5.0

Social activities

Rating: 4/5.0

Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 5/5.0

Accommodation
Homestay

Rating: 4/5.0

Additional information
Positive aspects of school:
Great teacher and classmates.
14. Nov. 2008
89.  (20 years)  
189. Course:  Intensive course 20 - 3 weeks

Overall Rating

Rating: 4/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 3/5.0

Detailed review
City/place

Rating: 5/5.0

School organization

Rating: 4/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 4/5.0

Social activities

Rating: 4/5.0

Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 4/5.0

Additional information
Positive aspects of school:
meet new people
Other comments:
cite universitaire is the best accomodation!
14. Nov. 2008
90. Ana (22 years)  
190. Course:  Intensive course 20 - 3 weeks

Overall Rating

Rating: 4/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 5/5.0

Detailed review
City/place

Rating: 5/5.0

School organization

Rating: 4/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 4/5.0

Social activities

Rating: 3/5.0

Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 3/5.0

31. Oct. 2008
91. Brigitta  (54 years)  Austria
191. Course:  Intensive course 20 - 2 weeks

Overall Rating

Rating: 2/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 2/5.0

Detailed review
City/place

Rating: 4/5.0

School organization

Rating: 3/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 1/5.0

Social activities

Rating: 1/5.0

Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 3/5.0

Accommodation
Homestay

Rating: 1/5.0

22. Oct. 2008
92.  (26 years)  Spain
192. Course:  Intensive course 20 - 4 weeks

Overall Rating

Rating: 4/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 3/5.0

Detailed review
City/place

Rating: 5/5.0

School organization

Rating: 4/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 4/5.0

Social activities

Rating: 4/5.0

Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 4/5.0

Additional information
Positive aspects of school:
the social activities and how much I've learned in four weeks

Save money! Exclusive promotions!
Sign up to benefit from the best language course deals.
Terms & ConditionsPrivacy & CookiesImprintReview and User Content Policies