X

Reviews of LSI - Language Studies International, Brisbane, Australia

Total number of reviews: 23
NOTE: All reviews are authentic. Only students who booked their course through us can publish evaluations here, and only after the end of their programme. These evaluations then are not manipulated in any way, neither by us nor by the school, and can be trusted as honest opinions about personal experiences with the school.

Average Rating

Based on 23 reviews of former students of LSI - Language Studies International
Overall Rating
LSI - Language Studies International, Brisbane, Australia

Rating: 4.0

4.0 
City

Rating: 4.4

4.4 
Organisation

Rating: 4.2

4.2 
Facilities

Rating: 3.4

3.4 
Social activities

Rating: 3.3

3.3 
Course quality / Progress in language

Rating: 4.2

4.2 
Value for money

Rating: 3.8

3.8 
Accommodation
Homestay

Rating: 4.1

4.1 
Shared Flat ---
other ---

Individual Reviews

LSI - Language Studies International
25. Feb. 2020
1. Hideki (42 years)  
101. Course:  Standard 20 English - 1 week

Overall Rating

Rating: 4/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 4/5.0

Detailed review
City/place

Rating: 5/5.0

School organization

Rating: 5/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 4/5.0

Social activities

Rating: 3/5.0

Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 4/5.0

29. Apr. 2019
2. Lirong (30 years)  China
102. Course:  Standard 20 [英语] - 8 weeks

Overall Rating

Rating: 3/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 2/5.0

Detailed review
City/place

Rating: 3/5.0

School organization

Rating: 3/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 2/5.0

Social activities

Rating: 2/5.0

Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 3/5.0

4. Jun. 2018
3.  (37 years)  
103. Course:  Intensive 24 [Englisch] - 2 weeks

Overall Rating

Rating: 4/5.0

Value for money
---
Detailed review
City/place

Rating: 5/5.0

School organization

Rating: 4/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 3/5.0

Social activities

Rating: 4/5.0

Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 5/5.0

15. Nov. 2016
4.  (23 years)  
104. Course:  Standard 20 - 2 weeks

Overall Rating

Rating: 4/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 4/5.0

Detailed review
City/place

Rating: 3/5.0

School organization

Rating: 5/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 4/5.0

Social activities

Rating: 4/5.0

Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 5/5.0

Additional information
Positive aspects of school:
The teacher and classmates were great! Learned a lot in just 2 weeks.
24. May. 2016
5. Annika Malene Elm (41 years)  Denmark
105. Course:  Standard 20 - 3 weeks

Overall Rating

Rating: 4/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 5/5.0

Detailed review
City/place

Rating: 5/5.0

School organization

Rating: 3/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 3/5.0

Social activities

Rating: 1/5.0

Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 5/5.0

Accommodation
Homestay

Rating: 4/5.0

23. Nov. 2015
6.  (23 years)  
106. Course:  Intensive 30 - 2 weeks

Overall Rating

Rating: 4/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 3/5.0

Detailed review
City/place

Rating: 4/5.0

School organization

Rating: 4/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 5/5.0

Social activities

Rating: 2/5.0

Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 5/5.0

Additional information
Positive aspects of school:
The language teaching
Other comments:
There are too few leisure activities available to students
23. Feb. 2015
7. Solenn (29 years)  
107. Course:  Standard 20 - 4 weeks

Overall Rating

Rating: 4/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 3/5.0

Detailed review
City/place
---
School organization

Rating: 5/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 4/5.0

Social activities

Rating: 3/5.0

Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 4/5.0

Accommodation
Homestay

Rating: 3/5.0

28. Aug. 2014
8. Test (49 years)  Spain
108. Course:  Intensive 24 - 2 weeks

Overall Rating

Rating: 5/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 5/5.0

Detailed review
City/place

Rating: 5/5.0

School organization

Rating: 5/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 5/5.0

Social activities
---
Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 5/5.0

11. Sep. 2013
9.  (20 years)  Spain
109. Course:  Intensive 30 - 1 week

Overall Rating

Rating: 4/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 3/5.0

Detailed review
City/place

Rating: 5/5.0

School organization

Rating: 5/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 5/5.0

Social activities

Rating: 4/5.0

Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 5/5.0

Additional information
Positive aspects of school:
teachers and classmates
28. Jul. 2013
10. Susanna (46 years)  Austria
110. Course:  Standard 20 - 2 weeks

Overall Rating

Rating: 4/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 4/5.0

Detailed review
City/place

Rating: 4/5.0

School organization

Rating: 5/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 4/5.0

Social activities
---
Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 4/5.0

12. Sep. 2012
11.  (26 years)  Australia
111. Course:  Standard 20 - 4 weeks

Overall Rating

Rating: 5/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 5/5.0

Detailed review
City/place

Rating: 5/5.0

School organization

Rating: 5/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 5/5.0

Social activities

Rating: 5/5.0

Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 5/5.0

Additional information
Positive aspects of school:
The Teachers and the classmates.
10. Sep. 2012
12.  (21 years)  Spain
112. Course:  Standard 20 - 3 weeks

Overall Rating

Rating: 5/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 4/5.0

Detailed review
City/place

Rating: 5/5.0

School organization

Rating: 4/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 4/5.0

Social activities

Rating: 2/5.0

Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 4/5.0

Accommodation
Homestay

Rating: 5/5.0

Additional information
Positive aspects of school:
The teachers and Sandy, always pleasant.
Insider tips about what future students should not miss:
Brisbane is an expensive city, at least food and drinks (spirits are really expensive). Also expect spending money on public transport.
28. Feb. 2012
13.  (28 years)  
113. Course:  Intensive 30 - 4 weeks

Overall Rating

Rating: 2/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 2/5.0

Detailed review
City/place

Rating: 5/5.0

School organization

Rating: 4/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 2/5.0

Social activities

Rating: 4/5.0

Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 1/5.0

Accommodation
Homestay

Rating: 4/5.0

Additional information
Positive aspects of school:
To have met many international people.
Other comments:
I cannot recommend LSI Brisbane. I was angry during 3 weeks for having booked 4 weeks from the start.
22. Nov. 2011
14.    
114. Course:  Intensive 24 - 6 weeks

Overall Rating

Rating: 4/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 5/5.0

Detailed review
City/place

Rating: 4/5.0

School organization

Rating: 4/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 4/5.0

Social activities

Rating: 3/5.0

Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 4/5.0

Additional information
Positive aspects of school:
Teachers and location (city center)
22. Nov. 2011
15. Sanny (31 years)  
115. Course:  Intensive 30 - 4 weeks

Overall Rating

Rating: 4/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 4/5.0

Detailed review
City/place

Rating: 5/5.0

School organization

Rating: 4/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 2/5.0

Social activities

Rating: 4/5.0

Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 4/5.0

31. Oct. 2011
16. Alicia  (27 years)  Spain
116. Course:  Standard 20 - 6 weeks

Overall Rating

Rating: 4/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 4/5.0

Detailed review
City/place

Rating: 5/5.0

School organization

Rating: 4/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 4/5.0

Social activities

Rating: 4/5.0

Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 4/5.0

Accommodation
Homestay

Rating: 3/5.0

8. Apr. 2011
17. Michele (26 years)  
117. Course:  Intensive 24 - 8 weeks

Overall Rating

Rating: 4/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 4/5.0

Detailed review
City/place

Rating: 4/5.0

School organization

Rating: 4/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 5/5.0

Social activities

Rating: 4/5.0

Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 4/5.0

15. Mar. 2011
18. Lina (22 years)  
118. Course:  Standard 20 - 8 weeks

Overall Rating

Rating: 4/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 5/5.0

Detailed review
City/place

Rating: 5/5.0

School organization

Rating: 3/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 2/5.0

Social activities

Rating: 4/5.0

Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 5/5.0

Additional information
Insider tips about what future students should not miss:
help finding housing or work
27. Dec. 2010
19. Juergen (30 years)  
119. Course:  Intensive 30 - 4 weeks

Overall Rating

Rating: 4/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 4/5.0

Detailed review
City/place

Rating: 5/5.0

School organization

Rating: 4/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 3/5.0

Social activities

Rating: 5/5.0

Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 4/5.0

6. Sep. 2010
20.  (26 years)  
120. Course:  Standard 20 - 6 weeks

Overall Rating

Rating: 3/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 3/5.0

Detailed review
City/place

Rating: 2/5.0

School organization

Rating: 4/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 3/5.0

Social activities

Rating: 1/5.0

Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 4/5.0

Accommodation
Homestay

Rating: 5/5.0

Additional information
Positive aspects of school:
The people
Insider tips about what future students should not miss:
Public transportation is very limited, and at night, in some areas, it is non existent.
Other comments:
Ideal for learning, not many distractions. It is better to stay for less than three months.
25. Jul. 2009
21.  (45 years)  
121. Course:  Intensive 24 - 4 weeks

Overall Rating

Rating: 5/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 4/5.0

Detailed review
City/place

Rating: 5/5.0

School organization

Rating: 4/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 2/5.0

Social activities

Rating: 5/5.0

Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 5/5.0

Accommodation
Homestay

Rating: 5/5.0

Additional information
Positive aspects of school:
The mix of nationalities.
Other comments:
Very good support by Ms. Eisenmann.
16. Nov. 2007
22.  (23 years)  
122. Course:  Standard 20 - 3 weeks

Overall Rating

Rating: 4/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 3/5.0

Detailed review
City/place

Rating: 4/5.0

School organization

Rating: 4/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 1/5.0

Social activities

Rating: 3/5.0

Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 4/5.0

Additional information
Positive aspects of school:
The family they gave me for and the teachers I had.
Other comments:
You have to repair or change the internet service. It's not good.
11. Oct. 2007
23.  (21 years)  
123. Course:  Standard 20 - 3 weeks

Overall Rating

Rating: 4/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 4/5.0

Detailed review
City/place

Rating: 4/5.0

School organization

Rating: 4/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 3/5.0

Social activities

Rating: 3/5.0

Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 4/5.0

Additional information
Positive aspects of school:
Students are very nice
Insider tips about what future students should not miss:
students and teachers were very nice

Save money! Exclusive promotions!
Sign up to benefit from the best language course deals.
Terms & ConditionsPrivacy & CookiesImprintReview and User Content Policies