Favorites heart icon
Favorites heart icon
X
Back to Q Language, Hong Kong

Reviews of Q Language, Hong Kong, Hong Kong

Total number of reviews: 15
NOTE: All reviews are authentic. Only students who booked their course through us can publish evaluations here, and only after the end of their programme. These evaluations then are not manipulated in any way, neither by us nor by the school, and can be trusted as honest opinions about personal experiences with the school.

Average Rating

Based on 15 reviews of former students of Q Language
Overall rating
Q Language, Hong Kong, Hong Kong

Rating: 3.9

3.9 
City

Rating: 4.9

4.9 
Organisation

Rating: 4.3

4.3 
Facilities

Rating: 3.6

3.6 
Social activities

Rating: 2.5

2.5 
Quality of teaching

Rating: 4.3

4.3 
Value for money

Rating: 3.8

3.8 
Accommodation
Homestay

Rating: 4.0

4.0 
Shared Flat (apartment)

Rating: 3.3

3.3 
Other ---

Individual Reviews

Q Language
12. Aug. 2019
1.  (54 years)  France
101.Course: Intensive 15 [Chinois] - 1 week

Overall rating

Rating: 5/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 5/5.0

Detailed review
City/place

Rating: 4/5.0

School organization

Rating: 5/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)
---
Social activities
---
Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 5/5.0

Accommodation
Other

Rating: 4/5.0

Additional information
Positive aspects of school
The director was very helpful. The teachers were very good. The other students were friendly and active during the lessons. I have learned interesting things.
Quality of teaching / language progress
I only stayed a week. I have not used the library and there was no activity during this week. The lessons were very interesting.
Accommodation
The room was okay. It was clean.
3. Jun. 2019
2. Takuya (48 years)  Switzerland
102.Course: Intensive 15 - 1 week

Overall rating

Rating: 3/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 2/5.0

Detailed review
City/place

Rating: 5/5.0

School organization

Rating: 3/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 2/5.0

Social activities

Rating: 1/5.0

Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 4/5.0

9. May. 2019
3. Tomomi (41 years)  Japan
103.Course: Intensive 24 [英語] - 1 week

Overall rating

Rating: 4/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 4/5.0

Detailed review
City/place

Rating: 5/5.0

School organization

Rating: 4/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 3/5.0

Social activities
---
Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 5/5.0

Accommodation
Other

Rating: 3/5.0

2. Nov. 2018
4.  (29 years)  
104.Course: Intensive 24 - 2 weeks

Overall rating

Rating: 3/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 2/5.0

Detailed review
City/place

Rating: 5/5.0

School organization

Rating: 3/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 2/5.0

Social activities

Rating: 1/5.0

Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 4/5.0

Accommodation
Other

Rating: 3/5.0

Additional information
Positive aspects of school
The teachers were highly motivated and well prepared.
Other comments
The leisure program is unfortunately not available. I've heard from classmates that long-term students (1+ year) are offered shared trips. However, there were zero events during my stay. Outside of your own class, unfortunately, there are no opportunities to get to know other classmates at the school, and there are no real common rooms. If you get one-to-one tuition because the booked course is not offered, you are left to fend for yourself after the end of the course. After a few days of one-to-one tuition, I was able to switch to a 15 lessons per week course plus a few individual lessons instead of the 24 lessons per week I had booked.
14. Aug. 2017
5. Riccardo (18 years)  Italy
105.Course: Intensive 15 - 2 weeks

Overall rating

Rating: 5/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 5/5.0

Detailed review
City/place

Rating: 5/5.0

School organization

Rating: 4/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 5/5.0

Social activities

Rating: 4/5.0

Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 5/5.0

Accommodation
Other

Rating: 5/5.0

29. Aug. 2016
6.    
106.Course: Intensive 24 - 1 week

Overall rating

Rating: 5/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 5/5.0

Detailed review
City/place

Rating: 5/5.0

School organization

Rating: 5/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 4/5.0

Social activities

Rating: 3/5.0

Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 5/5.0

Additional information
Positive aspects of school
Small group learning. Class allocation depending on the language levels.
Insider tips about what future students should not miss
As the school is located in an office building facing a street in downtown, it's a good location. However, it's a bit difficult to find the place. I recommend you to check the location in advance.
Other comments
The staff and teachers were very kind.
26. May. 2016
7.    
107.Course: Intensive 15 - 1 week

Overall rating

Rating: 3/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 3/5.0

Detailed review
City/place

Rating: 5/5.0

School organization

Rating: 5/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 4/5.0

Social activities
---
Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 4/5.0

Accommodation
Other

Rating: 1/5.0

Additional information
Positive aspects of school
It was good to have both the British English teacher and a teacher of American-style that taught me the lessons alternately.
Insider tips about what future students should not miss
Since there are many unique teachers and nationality and ages of students vary, I think it is for someone who want to enjoy learning English.
16. Dec. 2015
8. Junko (46 years)  
108.Course: Intensive 15 - 1 week

Overall rating

Rating: 5/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 5/5.0

Detailed review
City/place

Rating: 5/5.0

School organization

Rating: 5/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 5/5.0

Social activities
---
Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 5/5.0

Accommodation
Other

Rating: 5/5.0

Additional information
Other comments
Attentive and respectful way of treating with students.
27. Aug. 2015
9. Ayaka (19 years)  
109.Course: Intensive 15 - 1 week

Overall rating

Rating: 4/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 4/5.0

Detailed review
City/place

Rating: 5/5.0

School organization

Rating: 5/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 4/5.0

Social activities

Rating: 5/5.0

Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 4/5.0

Accommodation
Homestay Executive

Rating: 5/5.0

Additional information
Insider tips about what future students should not miss
This small school has very homey atmosphere. They have various and fulfilling contents.
20. Jul. 2015
10.  (43 years)  Italy
110.Course: Intensive 15 - 1 week

Overall rating

Rating: 4/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 4/5.0

Detailed review
City/place

Rating: 5/5.0

School organization

Rating: 5/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 5/5.0

Social activities

Rating: 3/5.0

Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 5/5.0

Accommodation
Other

Rating: 3/5.0

Additional information
Positive aspects of school
Good teaching
Other comments
No extra-curricular activities
23. Dec. 2014
11. Leah (24 years)  United Kingdom
111.Course: Intensive 15 - 1 week

Overall rating

Rating: 3/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 4/5.0

Detailed review
City/place

Rating: 5/5.0

School organization

Rating: 4/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 3/5.0

Social activities

Rating: 1/5.0

Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 3/5.0

2. Apr. 2014
12.  (50 years)  
112.Course: Intensive 24 - 1 week

Overall rating

Rating: 2/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 2/5.0

Detailed review
City/place

Rating: 5/5.0

School organization

Rating: 3/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 3/5.0

Social activities

Rating: 2/5.0

Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 2/5.0

Accommodation
Homestay Executive

Rating: 4/5.0

Additional information
Positive aspects of school
- This school seems to be one of the language schools which offer one-week Mandarin course. - Good access by subway. As it's close to Sheung Wan Station(上環駅), it's convenient to go sightseeing.
Insider tips about what future students should not miss
- English programs seem to be decent though, Mandarin ones are quite few. - I booked a course of 24 lessons per week. However, the course content was same as 15 lessons per week. I recommend you to book 15-lesson program.
Other comments
- Two teachers taught me. One of them didn't prepare handouts and asked us to take a picture. As there is a copy machine in the office, I preferred to have handouts.
5. Nov. 2013
13. Camilla (30 years)  
113.Course: Intensive English 24 - 1 week

Overall rating

Rating: 4/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 3/5.0

Detailed review
City/place

Rating: 5/5.0

School organization

Rating: 5/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 4/5.0

Social activities

Rating: 1/5.0

Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 5/5.0

Accommodation
Other

Rating: 3/5.0

17. Sep. 2013
14.  (36 years)  Japan
114.Course: Intensive English 24 - 2 weeks

Overall rating

Rating: 5/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 5/5.0

Detailed review
City/place

Rating: 4/5.0

School organization

Rating: 5/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 4/5.0

Social activities

Rating: 4/5.0

Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 5/5.0

Accommodation
Homestay Executive

Rating: 3/5.0

Additional information
Positive aspects of school
I met classmates with different nationalities.
10. Sep. 2012
15. Benjamin (26 years)  
115.Course: INTENSIVE MANDARIN 15 - 2 weeks

Overall rating

Rating: 3/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 4/5.0

Detailed review
City/place

Rating: 5/5.0

School organization

Rating: 3/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 3/5.0

Social activities

Rating: 2/5.0

Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 3/5.0

Accommodation
Other

Rating: 3/5.0


Terms & ConditionsRefund PolicyPrivacy & CookiesAbout UsContact UsImprintReview & User Content PoliciesTrust & SafetyAffiliate ProgrammeAdd Your School
© 1999 - 2024 LanguageCourse S.L.