X

Reviews of Scuola Lorenzo de Medici, Florence, Italy

Total number of reviews: 19
NOTE: All reviews are authentic. Only students who booked their course through us can publish evaluations here, and only after the end of their programme. These evaluations then are not manipulated in any way, neither by us nor by the school, and can be trusted as honest opinions about personal experiences with the school.

Average Rating

Based on 19 reviews of former students of Scuola Lorenzo de Medici
Overall Rating
Scuola Lorenzo de Medici, Florence, Italy

Rating of 4.2 out of 5 stars

4.2/5.0 
City

Rating of 4.5 out of 5 stars

4.5/5.0 
Organisation

Rating of 4.5 out of 5 stars

4.5/5.0 
Facilities

Rating of 3.9 out of 5 stars

3.9/5.0 
Social activities

Rating of 3.8 out of 5 stars

3.8/5.0 
Course quality / Progress in language

Rating of out of 5 stars

4.4/5.0 
Value for money

Rating of out of 5 stars

4.1/5.0 
Accommodation
Homestay

Rating of out of 5 stars

4.5/5.0 
Shared Flat

Rating of out of 5 stars

4.0/5.0 
other

Rating of out of 5 stars

0.0/5.0 

Individual Reviews

Scuola Lorenzo de Medici
18. Jun. 2019
1. Mary Margaret (66 years) - United States
101. Course:  Superintensive Programme - 1 week

Overall Rating

Rating of 5 out of 5 stars

Value for money

Rating of 5 out of 5 stars

Detailed review
City/place

Rating of 5 out of 5 stars

School organization

Rating of 5 out of 5 stars

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating of 5 out of 5 stars

Social activities

Rating of 6 out of 5 stars

Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating of 5 out of 5 stars

11. Jun. 2019
2. Dennis (76 years) - United States
102. Course:  Superintensive Programme [Italian] - 1 week

Overall Rating

Rating of 4 out of 5 stars

Value for money

Rating of 4 out of 5 stars

Detailed review
City/place

Rating of 4 out of 5 stars

School organization

Rating of 4 out of 5 stars

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating of 4 out of 5 stars

Social activities

Rating of 4 out of 5 stars

Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating of 4 out of 5 stars

Accommodation
Homestay

Rating of 4 out of 5 stars

28. Oct. 2014
3.  (36 years) - 
103. Course:  Standard - 1 week

Overall Rating

Rating of 3 out of 5 stars

Value for money

Rating of 3 out of 5 stars

Detailed review
City/place

Rating of 3 out of 5 stars

School organization

Rating of 4 out of 5 stars

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating of 3 out of 5 stars

Social activities

Rating of 3 out of 5 stars

Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating of 5 out of 5 stars

Accommodation
Shared Apartment

Rating of 4 out of 5 stars

Additional information
Positive aspects of school
The class was extremely challenging.
Other comments
Most of the students in my class were there for an extended period of time so I felt like I came in the middle of things. This made it difficult to connect with my classmates right away.
6. Sep. 2012
4.  (31 years) - Netherlands
104. Course:  Standard - 1 week

Overall Rating

Rating of 4 out of 5 stars

Value for money

Rating of 5 out of 5 stars

Detailed review
City/place

Rating of 5 out of 5 stars

School organization

Rating of 5 out of 5 stars

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating of 5 out of 5 stars

Social activities

Rating of 2 out of 5 stars

Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating of 5 out of 5 stars

Accommodation
Shared Apartment

Rating of 5 out of 5 stars

Additional information
Positive aspects of school
Great teachers.
10. Oct. 2011
5.  (38 years) - 
105. Course:  Standard - 4 weeks

Overall Rating

Rating of 5 out of 5 stars

Value for money

Rating of 4 out of 5 stars

Detailed review
City/place

Rating of 5 out of 5 stars

School organization

Rating of 5 out of 5 stars

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating of 4 out of 5 stars

Social activities

Rating of 4 out of 5 stars

Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating of 5 out of 5 stars

Accommodation
Shared Apartment

Rating of 3 out of 5 stars

Additional information
Positive aspects of school
The teachers were great, the lessons were fun. The coffee in the cafeteria was delicious.
Other comments
Unfortunately I heard about the school's activities towards the end of the course from other students who had booked with another agency (the school offers different courses like yoga, wine or singing club)
30. Aug. 2009
6. Elisabeth (42 years) - 
106. Course:  Standard - 1 week

Overall Rating

Rating of 4 out of 5 stars

Value for money

Rating of 4 out of 5 stars

Detailed review
City/place

Rating of 5 out of 5 stars

School organization

Rating of 4 out of 5 stars

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating of 4 out of 5 stars

Social activities

Rating of 4 out of 5 stars

Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating of 6 out of 5 stars

3. Dec. 2008
7. Anne  - 
107. Course:  Standard + Individual (20+5) - 2 weeks

Overall Rating

Rating of 3 out of 5 stars

Value for money

Rating of 2 out of 5 stars

Detailed review
City/place

Rating of 5 out of 5 stars

School organization

Rating of 4 out of 5 stars

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating of 2 out of 5 stars

Social activities

Rating of 2 out of 5 stars

Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating of 3 out of 5 stars

Accommodation
Homestay

Rating of 5 out of 5 stars

31. Jan. 2008
8.  (38 years) - 
108. Course:  Standard - 1 week

Overall Rating

Rating of 4 out of 5 stars

Value for money

Rating of 3 out of 5 stars

Detailed review
City/place

Rating of 5 out of 5 stars

School organization

Rating of 5 out of 5 stars

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating of 5 out of 5 stars

Social activities

Rating of 4 out of 5 stars

Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating of 4 out of 5 stars

Additional information
Positive aspects of school
The quality of the courses
Insider tips about what future students should not miss
Individual lessons are very effective to improve the level
25. Oct. 2007
9.  (28 years) - 
109. Course:  Standard (20 hrs) - 2 weeks

Overall Rating

Rating of 4 out of 5 stars

Value for money

Rating of 5 out of 5 stars

Detailed review
City/place

Rating of 4 out of 5 stars

School organization

Rating of 5 out of 5 stars

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating of 4 out of 5 stars

Social activities

Rating of 4 out of 5 stars

Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating of 5 out of 5 stars

Additional information
Positive aspects of school
very good teachers
Other comments
I think we have too much grammar to learn, and not enough time to integrate it properly. But the teachers are very good, and spend as much time as possible making us talk, even if we do not have the proper grammar
10. Aug. 2007
10.  (25 years) - 
110. Course:  Standard (20 hrs) - 2 weeks

Overall Rating

Rating of 4 out of 5 stars

Value for money

Rating of 4 out of 5 stars

Detailed review
City/place

Rating of 4 out of 5 stars

School organization

Rating of 4 out of 5 stars

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating of 3 out of 5 stars

Social activities

Rating of 4 out of 5 stars

Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating of 3 out of 5 stars

Additional information
Positive aspects of school
personal approach; all teachers know you personally
9. Aug. 2007
11.  (21 years) - 
111. Course:  Standard (20 hrs) - 6 weeks

Overall Rating

Rating of 5 out of 5 stars

Value for money

Rating of 4 out of 5 stars

Detailed review
City/place

Rating of 5 out of 5 stars

School organization

Rating of 5 out of 5 stars

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating of 5 out of 5 stars

Social activities

Rating of 5 out of 5 stars

Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating of 5 out of 5 stars

Additional information
Positive aspects of school
size of the classes
Insider tips about what future students should not miss
take part in the activities, like the visits tio the museums
9. Jul. 2005
12. Anonymous (28 years) - 
112. Course:  General Course

Overall Rating

Rating of 3 out of 5 stars

Value for money

Rating of 4 out of 5 stars

Detailed review
City/place

Rating of 5 out of 5 stars

School organization

Rating of 4 out of 5 stars

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating of 3 out of 5 stars

Social activities

Rating of 2 out of 5 stars

Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating of 5 out of 5 stars

30. Apr. 2005
13.  (56 years) - Norway
113. Course:  General Course

Overall Rating

Rating of 5 out of 5 stars

Value for money

Rating of 5 out of 5 stars

Detailed review
City/place

Rating of 4 out of 5 stars

School organization

Rating of 5 out of 5 stars

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating of 4 out of 5 stars

Social activities

Rating of 4 out of 5 stars

Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating of 5 out of 5 stars

Additional information
Positive aspects of school
theachers qualifications - personal approach
Insider tips about what future students should not miss
The possibility to have contact with an Italian family
30. Apr. 2005
14.  (58 years) - Norway
114. Course:  General Course

Overall Rating

Rating of 5 out of 5 stars

Value for money

Rating of 5 out of 5 stars

Detailed review
City/place

Rating of 4 out of 5 stars

School organization

Rating of 5 out of 5 stars

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating of 4 out of 5 stars

Social activities

Rating of 4 out of 5 stars

Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating of 5 out of 5 stars

Additional information
Positive aspects of school
theachers qualifications - personal approach
25. Mar. 2004
15.  (30 years) - Switzerland
115. Course:  General Course

Overall Rating

Rating of 4 out of 5 stars

Value for money

Rating of 4 out of 5 stars

Detailed review
City/place

Rating of 5 out of 5 stars

School organization

Rating of 4 out of 5 stars

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating of 3 out of 5 stars

Social activities

Rating of 4 out of 5 stars

Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating of 4 out of 5 stars

Additional information
Positive aspects of school
everybody very friendly
Insider tips about what future students should not miss
special courses (art, cooking..)
Other comments
it would be nice to have more students of different cultures (more mix of countries)
14. Dec. 2003
16. Anonymous (23 years) - Norway
116. Course:  General Course

Overall Rating

Rating of 5 out of 5 stars

Value for money

Rating of 6 out of 5 stars

Detailed review
City/place

Rating of 4 out of 5 stars

School organization

Rating of 4 out of 5 stars

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating of 4 out of 5 stars

Social activities

Rating of 5 out of 5 stars

Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating of 4 out of 5 stars

Additional information
Insider tips about what future students should not miss
Attend all activities.
30. Oct. 2003
17.  (65 years) - Österreich
117. Course:  General Course

Overall Rating

Rating of 5 out of 5 stars

Value for money

Rating of 4 out of 5 stars

Detailed review
City/place

Rating of 5 out of 5 stars

School organization

Rating of 5 out of 5 stars

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating of 4 out of 5 stars

Social activities

Rating of 5 out of 5 stars

Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating of 5 out of 5 stars

18. Jun. 2003
18. Markus (39 years) - Austria
118. Course:  General Course

Overall Rating

Rating of 4 out of 5 stars

Value for money

Rating of 4 out of 5 stars

Detailed review
City/place

Rating of 4 out of 5 stars

School organization

Rating of 4 out of 5 stars

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating of 4 out of 5 stars

Social activities

Rating of 4 out of 5 stars

Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating of 4 out of 5 stars

Additional information
Other comments
the teachers were all friendly, helpful, nice and motivated.
14. Jun. 2003
19. Anonymous  - 
119. Course:  General Course

Overall Rating

Rating of 4 out of 5 stars

Value for money

Rating of 4 out of 5 stars

Detailed review
City/place

Rating of 4 out of 5 stars

School organization

Rating of 4 out of 5 stars

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating of 5 out of 5 stars

Social activities

Rating of 4 out of 5 stars

Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating of 4 out of 5 stars


Save money! Exclusive promotions!

Sign up to benefit from the best language course deals.
In the press:
Press mentions
Press mentions
Trusted by:
trusted by
trusted by