X

Reviews of TANDEM Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany

Total No. of Reviews: 31
NOTE: All evaluations are authentic. Only former participants who have booked a course with us at the school can publish evaluations after the end of the course. Schools could therefore not manipulate evaluations and you can trust in all published evaluations.

Average Rating

Overall Rating
TANDEM Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
3.9/5.0 
(31 reviews)
City 4.6/5.0 
Organisation 4.2/5.0 
Facilities 3.5/5.0 
Social activities 3.0/5.0 
Course quality / Progress in language 3.9/5.0 
Value for money 3.7/5.0 
Accommodation
Host family 4.1/5.0 
Shared Flat 3.9/5.0 
other 3.9/5.0 
Individual Reviews
29. Dec. 2015
1. (25 years)  -  Taiwan
1. Intensive 20 (Levels A1, A2, and B1) - 3 weeks

Overall Rating
Value for money
Detailed review
City/place
School organization
Facilities (library, classrooms)
Social activities
Quality of teaching / language progress
Accommodation
Host family
Shared Flat
other
9. Nov. 2015
2. Kaori (22 years)  - 
2. Intensive 20 (Levels A1, A2, and B1) - 8 weeks

Overall Rating
Value for money
Detailed review
City/place
School organization
Facilities (library, classrooms)
Social activities
Quality of teaching / language progress
Accommodation
Homestay
Shared Flat
other
Additional information
Other comments
I was said the unreasonable things by a member of my host family. I don't have anything positive for the family. I think that the families should be more carefully checked. I tried to put up with this kind of treatment though, it was so terrible. I hope other students won't have a similar experience.
5. Oct. 2015
3. (24 years)  - 
3. Intensive 20 (Levels A1, A2, and B1) - 1 week

Overall Rating
Value for money
Detailed review
City/place
School organization
Facilities (library, classrooms)
Social activities
Quality of teaching / language progress
21. Sep. 2015
4. (31 years)  - 
4. German Intensive 20 - 1 week

Overall Rating
Value for money
Detailed review
City/place
School organization
Facilities (library, classrooms)
Social activities
Quality of teaching / language progress
Additional information
Positive aspects of school
The location of the school.
Insider tips about what future students should not miss
If they don't have a class with your level they will send you in a lower one.
Other comments
They advised me a week before the classes started that these had to be in the afternoon instead of in the morning, when I was booked excursions in the afternoon. Finally they put me in a lower level with the loss of time that entails.
9. Sep. 2015
5. (54 years)  - 
5. Intensive 20 - 3 weeks

Overall Rating
Value for money
Detailed review
City/place
School organization
Facilities (library, classrooms)
Social activities
Quality of teaching / language progress
Accommodation
Host Family (Category A)
Shared Flat
other
Additional information
Positive aspects of school
The location in the city. Administration staff were very attentive.
Insider tips about what future students should not miss
There are good teachers and some bad ones. if you get a bad teacher, then you do not improve.
Other comments
No facilities for students to work there after classes. Very small library, almost ridiculous. No audio-video material available for the students. No computers available for the students.
8. Sep. 2014
6. (21 years)  -  United States
6. Standard 20 Course - 3 weeks

Overall Rating
Value for money
Detailed review
City/place
School organization
Facilities (library, classrooms)
Social activities
Quality of teaching / language progress
Accommodation
Host family
Shared Flat
other
Additional information
Positive aspects of school
The location was great right in the middle of the city and I really liked having younger aged teachers.
Other comments
Conny was super nice but not the best and most exciting teacher. Mona and Nina were great :)
4. Sep. 2014
7. Lara (20 years)  - 
7. Intensive 20+2 course - 2 weeks

Overall Rating
Value for money
Detailed review
City/place
School organization
Facilities (library, classrooms)
Social activities
Quality of teaching / language progress
Accommodation
Host family
Shared Flat
other
29. Aug. 2014
8. Amparo (20 years)  - 
8. Standard 20 - 2 weeks

Overall Rating
Value for money
Detailed review
City/place
School organization
Facilities (library, classrooms)
Social activities
Quality of teaching / language progress
Accommodation
Homestay
Shared Flat
other
26. Aug. 2014
9. Stacy (34 years)  -  Switzerland
9. Standard 20 Course - 1 week

Overall Rating
Value for money
Detailed review
City/place
School organization
Facilities (library, classrooms)
Social activities
Quality of teaching / language progress
27. Sep. 2013
10. (38 years)  - 
10. Standard 20 Course - 2 weeks

Overall Rating
Value for money
Detailed review
City/place
School organization
Facilities (library, classrooms)
Social activities
Quality of teaching / language progress
Accommodation
Homestay
Shared Flat
other
Additional information
Positive aspects of school
That exchanges between students were active.
Insider tips about what future students should not miss
I recommend you to speak with other students voluntarily and make many friends. Please enjoy your school life there.
Other comments
As the school has only one coffee machine, there's always a long queue during a break. It should be better they have more machines.
10. Sep. 2013
11. (35 years)  - 
11. Standard 20 Course - 2 weeks

Overall Rating
Value for money
Detailed review
City/place
School organization
Facilities (library, classrooms)
Social activities
Quality of teaching / language progress
Accommodation
Host family
Shared Flat
other
Additional information
Positive aspects of school
Very good teachers: didactic and funny courses.
10. Jun. 2013
12.  - 
12. Super Intensive Combination Course 25 (20 group + 5 individual) - 4 weeks

Overall Rating
Value for money
Detailed review
City/place
School organization
Facilities (library, classrooms)
Social activities
Quality of teaching / language progress
Accommodation
Host family
Shared Flat
other
Additional information
Positive aspects of school
the private course given by an excellent teacher, who unfortunately only gave us two days per week of group courses and not the last week. The main teacher, 3 days per week, was particularly boring and little pedagogue, as per opinion of all students.
Insider tips about what future students should not miss
Hamburg
Other comments
CHECK THE QUALITY OF EACH TEACHER? I must say that the main teacher really spoiled the pleasure of learning, according to every student. This was written in the internal evaluation.
21. Jun. 2010
13. Hui (23 years)  - 
13. Standard 20 Course - 2 weeks

Overall Rating
Value for money
Detailed review
City/place
School organization
Facilities (library, classrooms)
Social activities
Quality of teaching / language progress
Accommodation
Host family
Shared Flat
19. Feb. 2010
14. (23 years)  -  United Kingdom
14. Standard 20 Course - 1 week

Overall Rating
Value for money
Detailed review
City/place
School organization
Facilities (library, classrooms)
Social activities
Quality of teaching / language progress
Accommodation
other
Additional information
Positive aspects of school
lessons were really good quality
Insider tips about what future students should not miss
if you are in the youth hostel, check out the pub crawl
30. Oct. 2008
15. (29 years)  - 
15. Intensive Course - 2 weeks

Overall Rating
Value for money
Detailed review
City/place
School organization
Facilities (library, classrooms)
Social activities
Quality of teaching / language progress
Accommodation
Host family
Additional information
Positive aspects of school
atmosphere
Insider tips about what future students should not miss
You will make a good choice
11. Jul. 2007
16. (14 years)  - 
16. Intensive Course - 3 weeks

Overall Rating
Value for money
Detailed review
City/place
School organization
Facilities (library, classrooms)
Social activities
Quality of teaching / language progress
Accommodation
other
Additional information
Positive aspects of school
good atmosphere, good differentiation of nationalities, nice book
Other comments
very costumer oriented, service was excellent.
13. Feb. 2007
17. (25 years)  -  Norway
17. Intensive Course - 3 weeks

Overall Rating
Value for money
Detailed review
City/place
School organization
Facilities (library, classrooms)
Social activities
Quality of teaching / language progress
Additional information
Positive aspects of school
Good teachers
9. Nov. 2006
18. (31 years)  - 
18. Intensive Course - 4 weeks

Overall Rating
Value for money
Detailed review
City/place
School organization
Facilities (library, classrooms)
Social activities
Quality of teaching / language progress
Accommodation
Shared Flat
Additional information
Positive aspects of school
My teachers were great
Other comments
Everyone from the teachers to the secretaries were so kind that you couldn't feel upset!
6. Sep. 2006
19. (33 years)  -  Italy
19. Intensive Course - 4 weeks

Overall Rating
Value for money
Detailed review
City/place
School organization
Facilities (library, classrooms)
Social activities
Quality of teaching / language progress
Accommodation
Shared Flat
Additional information
Positive aspects of school
well organized classes with not too many people
Insider tips about what future students should not miss
ask for a "learn-box" in the Altona book-shop
Other comments
well organized, frendly, well located, good teachers and finally good value for the money
27. Apr. 2006
20.  - 
20. Intensive Course - 4 weeks

Overall Rating
Value for money
Detailed review
City/place
School organization
Facilities (library, classrooms)
Social activities
Quality of teaching / language progress
Accommodation
Shared Flat
Additional information
Positive aspects of school
teachers
26. Apr. 2006
21.  - 
21. Intensive Course - 3 weeks

Overall Rating
Value for money
Detailed review
City/place
School organization
Facilities (library, classrooms)
Social activities
Quality of teaching / language progress
Accommodation
Host family
Additional information
Positive aspects of school
the teachers, the atmosphere and tha quality of the training
Insider tips about what future students should not miss
---
Other comments
---
27. Feb. 2006
22. Debora  -  Livorno
22. Intensive Course - 4 weeks

Overall Rating
Value for money
Detailed review
City/place
School organization
Facilities (library, classrooms)
Social activities
Quality of teaching / language progress
Accommodation
Host family
Shared Flat
other
9. Feb. 2006
23.  - 
23. Intensive Course - 2 weeks

Overall Rating
Value for money
Detailed review
City/place
School organization
Facilities (library, classrooms)
Social activities
Quality of teaching / language progress
Accommodation
Host family
Additional information
Positive aspects of school
the atmosphere in the class
Other comments
The only bad, form me, it's that the computers weren't very good.
19. Dec. 2005
24. José Manuel  - 
24. Intensive Course - 2 weeks

Overall Rating
Value for money
Detailed review
City/place
School organization
Facilities (library, classrooms)
Social activities
Quality of teaching / language progress
Accommodation
Shared Flat
19. Dec. 2005
25.  - 
25. Intensive Course - 2 weeks

Overall Rating
Value for money
Detailed review
City/place
School organization
Facilities (library, classrooms)
Social activities
Quality of teaching / language progress
Accommodation
Shared Flat
Additional information
Positive aspects of school
limited number of students per classroom
Insider tips about what future students should not miss
there is no library and no culture program if you don´t go in the summer
27. Sep. 2005
26.  - 
26. General

Overall Rating
Value for money
Detailed review
City/place
School organization
Facilities (library, classrooms)
Social activities
Quality of teaching / language progress
Accommodation
Host family
Shared Flat
other
Additional information
Positive aspects of school
Everything was great
Other comments
I think that the enviroment and everything was great in this school, it was a great experience
26. Jun. 2005
27. (33 years)  -  United States
27. General

Overall Rating
Value for money
Detailed review
City/place
School organization
Facilities (library, classrooms)
Social activities
Quality of teaching / language progress
Additional information
Positive aspects of school
The friendly instructors and outgoing students
Insider tips about what future students should not miss
a class hour is 45 minutes and not 60 minutes thus a four hour class is really 3 hours
Other comments
I rated low on the social activities because Tandem only offers excursions in the summer, on the up side, the students networked well and created there own excursions.
12. May. 2005
28. (19 years)  -  Switzterland
28. General

Overall Rating
Value for money
Detailed review
City/place
School organization
Facilities (library, classrooms)
Social activities
Quality of teaching / language progress
Accommodation
other
Additional information
Positive aspects of school
nice teachers
30. Dec. 2004
29. (22 years)  -  China
29. General

Overall Rating
Value for money
Detailed review
City/place
School organization
Facilities (library, classrooms)
Social activities
Quality of teaching / language progress
Accommodation
Host family
Additional information
Positive aspects of school
the size of the class is very small, and the teachers are very nice!
Insider tips about what future students should not miss
if you don't want to wait to use the internet at school, bring your own laptop!
Other comments
although the school looks quite small, it has a very good quality of teaching. a lot of students change to TANDEM from other language schools in hamburg.
20. Oct. 2004
30. (19 years)  -  Arieli
30. General

Overall Rating
Value for money
Detailed review
City/place
School organization
Facilities (library, classrooms)
Social activities
Quality of teaching / language progress
Accommodation
Host family
Additional information
Positive aspects of school
other students
Insider tips about what future students should not miss
The school has a very laid back attitude, and it is definitely better to visit it in summer time as part of a fun language course
Other comments
Placement into classes was not as accurate as it should have been. Some of the teachers were not professional enough, although a handful were extremely good. There was a lack of learning goals, and monitoring on the student's progress either.
9. Sep. 2004
31. (19 years)  -  Russia
31. General

Overall Rating
Value for money
Detailed review
City/place
School organization
Facilities (library, classrooms)
Social activities
Quality of teaching / language progress
Accommodation
other
Additional information
Positive aspects of school
students
Insider tips about what future students should not miss
don't be late
Other comments
very friendly teachers

I Liked
about LanguageCourse.net
  • Francesco (36): I had a doubt, a quick and precise reply helped me... more
  • Harm Jaap (46): Normally I contact language schools directly, but... more
  • Fiza (39): LanguageCourse.Net provides great rates, is very... more
*required