+1-646 503 18 10
Back to TANDEM, Hamburg

Reviews of TANDEM, Hamburg, Germany

NOTE: All reviews are authentic. Only students who booked their course through us can publish evaluations here, and only after the end of their programme. These evaluations then are not manipulated in any way, neither by us nor by the school, and can be trusted as honest opinions about personal experiences with the school.

Average Rating

4.1
Overall rating
TANDEM, Hamburg, Germany
Based on 63 reviews of former students of TANDEM
School
Location of the school
4.7 
Facilities
3.8 
Social activities
3.1 
Organisation
4.2 
Course
Quality of teaching
4.1 
Value for money
3.9 
Accommodation
Homestay
4.1 
Overall school rating by student age group
Students < 18 years (1 rating)
4.0 
Students 18-30 years (26 ratings)
4.3 
Students 31-49 years (15 ratings)
4.1 
Students 50+ years (14 ratings)
3.8 
Verified reviews only, uncensored. All student opinions from students who booked a course at the school with LanguageCourse.net.

Individual Reviews

TANDEM
6. May. 2024
 (54 years)  United States Course: Intensive 20 - 3 weeks
Overall rating

Rating: 4/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 4/5.0

Positive aspects of school
"A great school in a convenient location near the waterfront with knowledgeable, friendly instructors and diverse and interesting students. I highly recommend!"
Details of the review
Other comments
"I highly recommend this school!"
City/place
"Plenty of public transportation and a lovely waterfront."
Quality of teaching / language progress
"Great course and lots of fun!"
City/place

Rating: 5/5.0

School organization

Rating: 4/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 3/5.0

Social activities

Rating: 1/5.0

Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 5/5.0

3. Nov. 2020
 (53 years)  Germany Course: Intensive 20 - 11 weeks
Overall rating

Rating: 3/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 3/5.0

Positive aspects of school
"Calm atmosphere, compliance with all requirements during a pandemic, there are good teachers"
Insider tips about what future students should not miss
"Do homework"
Details of the review
Other comments
"I recommend to learn the language"
City/place
"A charming city for romantics and lovers of wind and rain"
Quality of teaching / language progress
"It would be good to consolidate the submitted material on the topic of tests to identify weaknesses in knowledge"
City/place

Rating: 5/5.0

School organization

Rating: 3/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 3/5.0

Social activities

Rating: 1/5.0

Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 3/5.0

4. Feb. 2019
 (57 years)  Germany Course: Intensive 20 - 4 weeks
Overall rating

Rating: 5/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 5/5.0

Positive aspects of school
"Teachers were really great like Nils & Sigrid."
Insider tips about what future students should not miss
"Be ready for plenty of homework & also try to prepare in advance for the coming lessons."
Details of the review
Other comments
"Great value & teaching. Small tip - teachers should check to ensure all class members have “got the point/understood”, not just the ones that answer quickly. They should also make available some “high volume” working exercises for each specific point, to allow students to thoroughly practice. Currently the number of worked examples is more aimed at demonstrating the issues & then a few tests, rather than multiple examples to ensure the points are fully trained."
City/place

Rating: 5/5.0

School organization

Rating: 5/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 5/5.0

Social activities
---
Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 5/5.0

11. Dec. 2018
 (33 years)  China Course: Intensive 20 - 2 weeks
Overall rating

Rating: 4/5.0

Value for money
---
Positive aspects of school
"Small class teaching, teachers and students can exchange more"
Insider tips about what future students should not miss
"The teacher’s basic German teaching will not understand very well at first."
Details of the review
Other comments
"I really like the teachers here, they are very serious and punctual."
City/place

Rating: 5/5.0

School organization

Rating: 4/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 4/5.0

Social activities

Rating: 4/5.0

Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 4/5.0

28. Nov. 2018
 (31 years)  United Kingdom Course: Intensive 20 - 7 weeks
Overall rating

Rating: 4/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 4/5.0

Positive aspects of school
"The teaching quality is super good. I'm really impressive of several teachers there."
Insider tips about what future students should not miss
"I think the future students shall preview the books in advance. This will help you to learn more in class."
Details of the review
Other comments
"I think it is worthy of the money to learn German here."
City/place

Rating: 4/5.0

School organization

Rating: 4/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 3/5.0

Social activities

Rating: 1/5.0

Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 4/5.0

Accommodation
Homestay

Rating: 3/5.0

27. Nov. 2018
 (22 years)  Brazil Course: Intensive 20 - 5 weeks
Overall rating

Rating: 4/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 4/5.0

Positive aspects of school
"The teachers were very attentive and provided a quality teaching guaranteeing the student's understanding."
Insider tips about what future students should not miss
"I only did one month course and it was great, but if you can do more than a month you will have an excellent learning."
Details of the review
Other comments
"Well organized school, staff always ready for the best service."
City/place

Rating: 5/5.0

School organization

Rating: 5/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 4/5.0

Social activities

Rating: 4/5.0

Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 5/5.0

Accommodation
Homestay

Rating: 5/5.0

27. Nov. 2018
 (65 years)  Ireland Course: Intensive 20 - 2 weeks
Overall rating

Rating: 5/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 5/5.0

Positive aspects of school
"I found the teachers were friendly, helpful and well prepared."
Insider tips about what future students should not miss
"Students should be prepared to speak German and not be afraid of making mistakes. This is the best way to learn. Practice, practice and eventually you will be perfect."
Details of the review
Other comments
"School very organised. Maybe the school could promote extracurricular activities."
City/place

Rating: 5/5.0

School organization

Rating: 5/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 5/5.0

Social activities

Rating: 2/5.0

Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 5/5.0

Accommodation
Homestay

Rating: 3/5.0

27. Aug. 2018
 (23 years)   Course: Intensive 20 - 3 weeks
Overall rating

Rating: 5/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 5/5.0

Positive aspects of school
"The school has excellent and highly qualified teachers who are happy to answer all students' questions. The school also organizes off-site activities that students attend with a teacher. Excellent team and friendly atmosphere."
Insider tips about what future students should not miss
"Before starting the course, you should request a language level test. But! This is only necessary if you are not sure what your level is."
Details of the review
Other comments
"Great school in a wonderful and picturesque area of Hamburg."
City/place

Rating: 5/5.0

School organization

Rating: 5/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 5/5.0

Social activities

Rating: 5/5.0

Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 5/5.0

Accommodation
Homestay

Rating: 5/5.0

29. Aug. 2017
 (62 years)  Russia Course: Intensive 20 - 2 weeks
Overall rating

Rating: 4/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 3/5.0

Positive aspects of school
"I liked both teachers very much: both Anna and Enrique. It was fun. informative. interesting."
Details of the review
City/place

Rating: 5/5.0

School organization

Rating: 4/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 4/5.0

Social activities

Rating: 1/5.0

Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 5/5.0

17. Jun. 2017
 (44 years)   Course: Intensive 25 - 2 weeks
Overall rating

Rating: 5/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 5/5.0

Positive aspects of school
"Friendliness, punctuality. The entire teaching."
Details of the review
City/place

Rating: 5/5.0

School organization

Rating: 5/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 5/5.0

Social activities

Rating: 5/5.0

Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 5/5.0

Accommodation
Homestay

Rating: 5/5.0

10. Jun. 2017
 (63 years)  United Kingdom Course: Intensive 25 - 2 weeks
Overall rating

Rating: 5/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 5/5.0

Positive aspects of school
"Excellent teaching standards from Anke and Anna. Patient, encouraging and engaging. (I hope I got their names right!)"
Insider tips about what future students should not miss
"Speak in class at every opportunity."
Details of the review
Other comments
"Excellent school. Location in large city did not suit me; but that was my choice."
City/place

Rating: 2/5.0

School organization

Rating: 4/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 5/5.0

Social activities

Rating: 4/5.0

Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 5/5.0

Accommodation
Homestay

Rating: 5/5.0

15. May. 2017
 (38 years)   Course: Intensive 20 - 9 weeks
Overall rating

Rating: 4/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 4/5.0

Positive aspects of school
"Competent teachers. Nice lessons with few students. A good organization."
Details of the review
City/place

Rating: 4/5.0

School organization

Rating: 4/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 3/5.0

Social activities

Rating: 3/5.0

Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 4/5.0

Accommodation
Homestay

Rating: 5/5.0

10. Oct. 2016
 (36 years)  Turkey Course: Intensive 25 - 4 weeks
Overall rating

Rating: 4/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 4/5.0

Positive aspects of school
"My teachers and classmates"
Details of the review
City/place

Rating: 5/5.0

School organization

Rating: 3/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 3/5.0

Social activities

Rating: 5/5.0

Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 4/5.0

Accommodation
Homestay

Rating: 5/5.0

30. Aug. 2016
Kanna (20 years)   Course: Intensive 20 - 2 weeks
Overall rating

Rating: 3/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 4/5.0

Insider tips about what future students should not miss
"If you are young like just around 20 years old, other students are much older than you."
Details of the review
City/place

Rating: 3/5.0

School organization

Rating: 3/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 4/5.0

Social activities

Rating: 2/5.0

Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 5/5.0

Accommodation
Homestay

Rating: 4/5.0

20. Jul. 2016
 (27 years)   Course: Intensive 20 - 1 week
Overall rating

Rating: 4/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 4/5.0

Positive aspects of school
"The international atmosphere of the lessons."
Insider tips about what future students should not miss
"Let them know in advance if there is no accommodation available through the academy."
Details of the review
City/place

Rating: 5/5.0

School organization

Rating: 4/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 4/5.0

Social activities

Rating: 3/5.0

Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 4/5.0

Accommodation
Homestay

Rating: 1/5.0

29. Dec. 2015
 (25 years)  Taiwan Course: Intensive 20 - 3 weeks
Overall rating

Rating: 4/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 4/5.0

Positive aspects of school
"Everybody is nice in the school!"
Details of the review
Other comments
"Good!"
City/place

Rating: 5/5.0

School organization

Rating: 4/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 4/5.0

Social activities

Rating: 3/5.0

Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 5/5.0

Accommodation
Homestay

Rating: 5/5.0

5. Oct. 2015
 (24 years)  Norway Course: Intensive 20 - 1 week
Overall rating

Rating: 4/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 3/5.0

Positive aspects of school
"Teachers, small classes"
Insider tips about what future students should not miss
"That's expensive!! Suddenly there came a supplement of € 40 on a book, which I had never heard of."
Details of the review
Other comments
"Good, is well located"
City/place

Rating: 5/5.0

School organization

Rating: 4/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 4/5.0

Social activities

Rating: 2/5.0

Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 4/5.0

21. Sep. 2015
 (31 years)   Course: Standard Course - 1 week
Overall rating

Rating: 2/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 2/5.0

Positive aspects of school
"The location of the school."
Insider tips about what future students should not miss
"If they don't have a class with your level they will send you in a lower one."
Details of the review
Other comments
"They advised me a week before the classes started that these had to be in the afternoon instead of in the morning, when I was booked excursions in the afternoon. Finally they put me in a lower level with the loss of time that entails."
City/place

Rating: 3/5.0

School organization

Rating: 2/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 2/5.0

Social activities

Rating: 2/5.0

Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 2/5.0

9. Sep. 2015
 (54 years)   Course: Main Course - 3 weeks
Overall rating

Rating: 2/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 2/5.0

Positive aspects of school
"The location in the city. Administration staff were very attentive."
Insider tips about what future students should not miss
"There are good teachers and some bad ones. if you get a bad teacher, then you do not improve."
Details of the review
Other comments
"No facilities for students to work there after classes. Very small library, almost ridiculous. No audio-video material available for the students. No computers available for the students."
City/place

Rating: 4/5.0

School organization

Rating: 4/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 2/5.0

Social activities

Rating: 3/5.0

Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 1/5.0

Accommodation
Homestay (Category A)

Rating: 3/5.0

8. Sep. 2014
 (21 years)   Course: Standard 20 Course - 3 weeks
Overall rating

Rating: 3/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 3/5.0

Positive aspects of school
"The location was great right in the middle of the city and I really liked having younger aged teachers."
Details of the review
Other comments
"Conny was super nice but not the best and most exciting teacher. Mona and Nina were great :)"
City/place

Rating: 5/5.0

School organization

Rating: 5/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 3/5.0

Social activities

Rating: 1/5.0

Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 3/5.0

Accommodation
Homestay Executive

Rating: 3/5.0

27. Sep. 2013
 (38 years)   Course: Standard 20 Course - 2 weeks
Overall rating

Rating: 4/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 5/5.0

Positive aspects of school
"That exchanges between students were active."
Insider tips about what future students should not miss
"I recommend you to speak with other students voluntarily and make many friends. Please enjoy your school life there."
Details of the review
Other comments
"As the school has only one coffee machine, there's always a long queue during a break. It should be better they have more machines."
City/place

Rating: 5/5.0

School organization

Rating: 5/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 5/5.0

Social activities

Rating: 3/5.0

Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 5/5.0

Accommodation
Homestay

Rating: 3/5.0

10. Sep. 2013
 (35 years)   Course: Standard 20 Course - 2 weeks
Overall rating

Rating: 5/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 4/5.0

Positive aspects of school
"Very good teachers: didactic and funny courses."
Details of the review
City/place

Rating: 4/5.0

School organization

Rating: 5/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 4/5.0

Social activities

Rating: 4/5.0

Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 5/5.0

Accommodation
Homestay

Rating: 4/5.0

10. Jun. 2013
    Course: Super Intensive Combination Course 25 (20 group + 5 individual) - 4 weeks
Overall rating

Rating: 3/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 3/5.0

Positive aspects of school
"The private course given by an excellent teacher, who unfortunately only gave us two days per week of group courses and not the last week. The main teacher, 3 days per week, was particularly boring and little pedagogue, as per opinion of all students."
Insider tips about what future students should not miss
"Hamburg"
Details of the review
Other comments
"CHECK THE QUALITY OF EACH TEACHER? I must say that the main teacher really spoiled the pleasure of learning, according to every student. This was written in the internal evaluation."
City/place

Rating: 5/5.0

School organization

Rating: 5/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 3/5.0

Social activities

Rating: 2/5.0

Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 3/5.0

Accommodation
Homestay

Rating: 4/5.0

21. Jun. 2010
Hui (23 years)   Course: Standard 20 Course - 2 weeks
Overall rating

Rating: 4/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 4/5.0

Negative aspects
"No social activities. The accommodation was quite far. The school is rather small and does not have many students."
Details of the review
City/place

Rating: 4/5.0

School organization

Rating: 4/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 4/5.0

Social activities

Rating: 1/5.0

Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 4/5.0

Accommodation
Homestay

Rating: 4/5.0

19. Feb. 2010
 (23 years)  United Kingdom Course: Standard 20 Course - 1 week
Overall rating

Rating: 4/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 4/5.0

Positive aspects of school
"Lessons were really good quality"
Insider tips about what future students should not miss
"If you are in the youth hostel, check out the pub crawl"
Details of the review
City/place

Rating: 4/5.0

School organization

Rating: 5/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 3/5.0

Social activities

Rating: 2/5.0

Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 5/5.0

30. Oct. 2008
 (29 years)   Course: Standard 20 Course - 2 weeks
Overall rating

Rating: 5/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 4/5.0

Positive aspects of school
"Atmosphere"
Insider tips about what future students should not miss
"You will make a good choice"
Details of the review
City/place

Rating: 5/5.0

School organization

Rating: 5/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 4/5.0

Social activities

Rating: 4/5.0

Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 5/5.0

Accommodation
Homestay

Rating: 4/5.0

11. Jul. 2007
 (14 years)   Course: Standard 20 Course - 3 weeks
Overall rating

Rating: 4/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 4/5.0

Positive aspects of school
"Good atmosphere, good differentiation of nationalities, nice book"
Details of the review
Other comments
"Very costumer oriented, service was excellent."
City/place

Rating: 5/5.0

School organization

Rating: 4/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 3/5.0

Social activities

Rating: 3/5.0

Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 4/5.0

13. Feb. 2007
 (25 years)  Norway Course: Standard 20 Course - 3 weeks
Overall rating

Rating: 3/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 3/5.0

Positive aspects of school
"Good teachers"
Details of the review
City/place

Rating: 4/5.0

School organization

Rating: 3/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 4/5.0

Social activities

Rating: 4/5.0

Quality of teaching / language progress
---
9. Nov. 2006
 (31 years)   Course: Standard 20 Course - 4 weeks
Overall rating

Rating: 5/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 4/5.0

Positive aspects of school
"My teachers were great"
Details of the review
Other comments
"Everyone from the teachers to the secretaries were so kind that you couldn't feel upset!"
City/place

Rating: 5/5.0

School organization

Rating: 5/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 5/5.0

Social activities

Rating: 4/5.0

Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 5/5.0

6. Sep. 2006
 (33 years)  Italy Course: Standard 20 Course - 4 weeks
Overall rating

Rating: 4/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 4/5.0

Positive aspects of school
"Well organized classes with not too many people"
Insider tips about what future students should not miss
"Ask for a "learn-box" in the Altona book-shop"
Details of the review
Other comments
"Well organized, frendly, well located, good teachers and finally good value for the money"
City/place

Rating: 5/5.0

School organization

Rating: 4/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 3/5.0

Social activities

Rating: 4/5.0

Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 4/5.0

27. Apr. 2006
    Course: Standard 20 Course - 4 weeks
Overall rating

Rating: 4/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 5/5.0

Positive aspects of school
"Teachers"
Details of the review
City/place

Rating: 5/5.0

School organization

Rating: 4/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 3/5.0

Social activities

Rating: 3/5.0

Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 4/5.0

26. Apr. 2006
    Course: Standard 20 Course - 3 weeks
Overall rating

Rating: 5/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 5/5.0

Positive aspects of school
"The teachers, the atmosphere and tha quality of the training"
Insider tips about what future students should not miss
"---"
Details of the review
Other comments
"---"
City/place

Rating: 4/5.0

School organization

Rating: 4/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 3/5.0

Social activities

Rating: 4/5.0

Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 5/5.0

Accommodation
Homestay Executive

Rating: 5/5.0

9. Feb. 2006
    Course: Standard 20 Course - 2 weeks
Overall rating

Rating: 5/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 4/5.0

Positive aspects of school
"The atmosphere in the class"
Details of the review
Other comments
"The only bad, form me, it's that the computers weren't very good."
City/place

Rating: 5/5.0

School organization

Rating: 5/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 3/5.0

Social activities

Rating: 4/5.0

Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 4/5.0

Accommodation
Homestay Executive

Rating: 4/5.0

19. Dec. 2005
    Course: Standard 20 Course - 2 weeks
Overall rating

Rating: 3/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 4/5.0

Positive aspects of school
"Limited number of students per classroom"
Insider tips about what future students should not miss
"There is no library and no culture program if you don´t go in the summer"
Details of the review
City/place

Rating: 5/5.0

School organization

Rating: 3/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 2/5.0

Social activities

Rating: 2/5.0

Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 3/5.0

27. Sep. 2005
    Course: Standard
Overall rating

Rating: 5/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 5/5.0

Positive aspects of school
"Everything was great"
Details of the review
Other comments
"I think that the enviroment and everything was great in this school, it was a great experience"
City/place

Rating: 5/5.0

School organization

Rating: 5/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 5/5.0

Social activities

Rating: 4/5.0

Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 5/5.0

26. Jun. 2005
 (33 years)  United States Course: Standard
Overall rating

Rating: 4/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 4/5.0

Positive aspects of school
"The friendly instructors and outgoing students"
Insider tips about what future students should not miss
"A class hour is 45 minutes and not 60 minutes thus a four hour class is really 3 hours"
Details of the review
Other comments
"I rated low on the social activities because Tandem only offers excursions in the summer, on the up side, the students networked well and created there own excursions."
City/place

Rating: 5/5.0

School organization

Rating: 3/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 3/5.0

Social activities

Rating: 2/5.0

Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 5/5.0

12. May. 2005
 (19 years)  Switzterland Course: Standard
Overall rating

Rating: 4/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 4/5.0

Positive aspects of school
"Nice teachers"
Details of the review
City/place

Rating: 5/5.0

School organization

Rating: 4/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 4/5.0

Social activities

Rating: 1/5.0

Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 4/5.0

30. Dec. 2004
 (22 years)  China Course: Standard
Overall rating

Rating: 4/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 2/5.0

Positive aspects of school
"The size of the class is very small, and the teachers are very nice!"
Insider tips about what future students should not miss
"If you don't want to wait to use the internet at school, bring your own laptop!"
Details of the review
Other comments
"Although the school looks quite small, it has a very good quality of teaching. a lot of students change to TANDEM from other language schools in hamburg."
City/place

Rating: 4/5.0

School organization

Rating: 4/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 3/5.0

Social activities

Rating: 4/5.0

Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 4/5.0

20. Oct. 2004
 (19 years)  Arieli Course: Standard
Overall rating

Rating: 4/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 4/5.0

Positive aspects of school
"Other students"
Insider tips about what future students should not miss
"The school has a very laid back attitude, and it is definitely better to visit it in summer time as part of a fun language course"
Details of the review
Other comments
"Placement into classes was not as accurate as it should have been. Some of the teachers were not professional enough, although a handful were extremely good. There was a lack of learning goals, and monitoring on the student's progress either."
City/place

Rating: 4/5.0

School organization

Rating: 4/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 3/5.0

Social activities

Rating: 4/5.0

Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 4/5.0

9. Sep. 2004
 (19 years)  Russia Course: Standard
Overall rating

Rating: 5/5.0

Value for money
---
Positive aspects of school
"Students"
Insider tips about what future students should not miss
"Don't be late"
Details of the review
Other comments
"Very friendly teachers"
City/place

Rating: 5/5.0

School organization

Rating: 4/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 4/5.0

Social activities

Rating: 5/5.0

Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 5/5.0

9. Nov. 2015
Kaori (22 years)   Course: Intensive 20 - 8 weeks
Overall rating

Rating: 2/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 1/5.0

Details of the review
Other comments
"I was said the unreasonable things by a member of my host family. I don't have anything positive for the family. I think that the families should be more carefully checked. I tried to put up with this kind of treatment though, it was so terrible. I hope other students won't have a similar experience."
City/place

Rating: 4/5.0

School organization

Rating: 4/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 3/5.0

Social activities

Rating: 3/5.0

Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 2/5.0

Accommodation
Homestay

Rating: 1/5.0

23. Oct. 2023
Evgeny    Germany Course: Intensive 20 - 15 weeks
Overall rating
---
Value for money
---
Details of the review
City/place
---
School organization
---
Facilities (library, classrooms)
---
Social activities
---
Quality of teaching / language progress
---
29. Nov. 2021
Jose (23 years)   Course: Intensive 25 - 10 weeks
Overall rating

Rating: 5/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 5/5.0

Details of the review
City/place

Rating: 4/5.0

School organization

Rating: 5/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 5/5.0

Social activities

Rating: 1/5.0

Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 5/5.0

30. Mar. 2020
Carlos (20 years)   Course: Intensive 20 - 17 weeks
Overall rating

Rating: 5/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 5/5.0

Details of the review
City/place

Rating: 5/5.0

School organization

Rating: 5/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 4/5.0

Social activities

Rating: 5/5.0

Quality of teaching / language progress
---
Accommodation
Homestay

Rating: 4/5.0

2. Mar. 2020
Estefanía (22 years)  Germany Course: Intensive 20 - 2 weeks
Overall rating

Rating: 5/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 4/5.0

Details of the review
City/place

Rating: 4/5.0

School organization

Rating: 5/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 4/5.0

Social activities
---
Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 5/5.0

16. Dec. 2019
Ziyue (23 years)  Germany Course: Intensive 20 - 4 weeks
Overall rating

Rating: 5/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 5/5.0

Details of the review
City/place

Rating: 4/5.0

School organization

Rating: 3/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)
---
Social activities
---
Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 4/5.0

21. Oct. 2019
Oleksandra (20 years)   Course: Intensive 20 - 4 weeks
Overall rating

Rating: 5/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 3/5.0

Details of the review
City/place

Rating: 5/5.0

School organization

Rating: 5/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 5/5.0

Social activities

Rating: 5/5.0

Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 5/5.0

Accommodation
Homestay

Rating: 5/5.0

2. Oct. 2019
Lieke (23 years)  Netherlands Course: Intensive 25 - 1 week
Overall rating

Rating: 4/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 4/5.0

Details of the review
City/place

Rating: 5/5.0

School organization

Rating: 5/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 4/5.0

Social activities

Rating: 3/5.0

Quality of teaching / language progress
---
24. Sep. 2019
Renata (36 years)  Germany Course: Intensive 20 - 8 weeks
Overall rating

Rating: 5/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 3/5.0

Details of the review
City/place

Rating: 4/5.0

School organization

Rating: 5/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 4/5.0

Social activities

Rating: 4/5.0

Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 4/5.0

22. Aug. 2019
Yu (45 years)  France Course: Intensive 20 - 2 weeks
Overall rating

Rating: 3/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 3/5.0

Details of the review
City/place

Rating: 4/5.0

School organization

Rating: 4/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 5/5.0

Social activities

Rating: 3/5.0

Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 3/5.0

Accommodation
Homestay

Rating: 4/5.0

14. Aug. 2019
Walter (58 years)  Italy Course: Intensive 20 - 2 weeks
Overall rating

Rating: 4/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 4/5.0

Details of the review
City/place

Rating: 5/5.0

School organization

Rating: 5/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 5/5.0

Social activities
---
Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 4/5.0

14. Aug. 2019
Cinzia (67 years)  Italy Course: Intensive 20 - 2 weeks
Overall rating

Rating: 4/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 4/5.0

Details of the review
City/place

Rating: 5/5.0

School organization

Rating: 5/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 5/5.0

Social activities
---
Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 4/5.0

13. Aug. 2019
Matěj (18 years)  Czech Republic Course: Intensive 25 - 2 weeks
Overall rating

Rating: 4/5.0

Value for money
---
Details of the review
City/place

Rating: 4/5.0

School organization
---
Facilities (library, classrooms)
---
Social activities
---
Quality of teaching / language progress
---
Accommodation
Homestay

Rating: 4/5.0

2. Aug. 2019
Jens  (58 years)  Denmark Course: Intensive 20 - 2 weeks
Overall rating

Rating: 4/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 3/5.0

Details of the review
City/place

Rating: 4/5.0

School organization

Rating: 4/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 3/5.0

Social activities

Rating: 5/5.0

Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 3/5.0

Accommodation
Homestay

Rating: 4/5.0

28. May. 2019
Natalya (47 years)  Russia Course: Intensive 25 - 3 weeks
Overall rating

Rating: 5/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 4/5.0

Details of the review
City/place

Rating: 5/5.0

School organization

Rating: 5/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 5/5.0

Social activities

Rating: 4/5.0

Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 5/5.0

Accommodation
Homestay

Rating: 5/5.0

1. Apr. 2019
Mariano Andres (27 years)  Switzerland Course: Intensive 20 - 4 weeks
Overall rating

Rating: 5/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 4/5.0

Details of the review
City/place

Rating: 5/5.0

School organization

Rating: 4/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 4/5.0

Social activities

Rating: 4/5.0

Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 4/5.0

Accommodation
Homestay

Rating: 5/5.0

11. Dec. 2018
Raffaella (45 years)   Course: Intensive 25 - 3 weeks
Overall rating

Rating: 5/5.0

Value for money
---
Details of the review
City/place

Rating: 5/5.0

School organization

Rating: 4/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 4/5.0

Social activities

Rating: 3/5.0

Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 4/5.0

Accommodation
Homestay

Rating: 5/5.0

6. Jun. 2017
Thierry (31 years)  Switzerland Course: Intensive 20 - 3 weeks
Overall rating

Rating: 4/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 4/5.0

Details of the review
City/place

Rating: 5/5.0

School organization

Rating: 3/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 2/5.0

Social activities

Rating: 2/5.0

Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 4/5.0

Accommodation
Homestay

Rating: 5/5.0

4. Sep. 2014
Lara (20 years)   Course: Intensive 20+2 course - 2 weeks
Overall rating

Rating: 5/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 4/5.0

Details of the review
City/place

Rating: 5/5.0

School organization

Rating: 5/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 5/5.0

Social activities

Rating: 4/5.0

Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 4/5.0

Accommodation
Homestay

Rating: 5/5.0

29. Aug. 2014
Amparo (20 years)   Course: Intensive 20+4 course - 2 weeks
Overall rating

Rating: 4/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 4/5.0

Details of the review
City/place

Rating: 5/5.0

School organization

Rating: 4/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 4/5.0

Social activities

Rating: 2/5.0

Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 4/5.0

Accommodation
Homestay

Rating: 5/5.0

26. Aug. 2014
Stacy (34 years)  Switzerland Course: Standard 20 Course - 1 week
Overall rating

Rating: 4/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 4/5.0

Details of the review
City/place

Rating: 5/5.0

School organization

Rating: 4/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 5/5.0

Social activities

Rating: 4/5.0

Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 4/5.0

27. Feb. 2006
Debora    Course: Standard 20 Course - 4 weeks
Overall rating

Rating: 3/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 3/5.0

Details of the review
City/place

Rating: 4/5.0

School organization

Rating: 4/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 3/5.0

Social activities

Rating: 3/5.0

Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 2/5.0

Accommodation
Homestay Executive

Rating: 4/5.0

19. Dec. 2005
José Manuel    Course: Standard 20 Course - 2 weeks
Overall rating

Rating: 4/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 4/5.0

Details of the review
City/place

Rating: 5/5.0

School organization

Rating: 4/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 3/5.0

Social activities

Rating: 1/5.0

Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 4/5.0


Terms & conditionsRefund policyPrivacy & cookiesAbout usContact UsImprintReview & user content policiesTrust & safetyAffiliate programmeAdd your school
© 1999 - 2026 LanguageCourse S.L.