+1-646 503 18 10
X
Back to Les ateliers FL, Paris

Reviews of Les ateliers FL, Paris, France

NOTE: All reviews are authentic. Only students who booked their course through us can publish evaluations here, and only after the end of their programme. These evaluations then are not manipulated in any way, neither by us nor by the school, and can be trusted as honest opinions about personal experiences with the school.

Average Rating

4.4
Overall rating
Les ateliers FL, Paris, France
Based on 55 reviews of former students of Les ateliers FL
School
Location of the school
4.8 
Facilities
3.9 
Social activities
3.8 
Organisation
4.2 
Course
Quality of teaching
4.4 
Value for money
4.2 
Accommodation
Homestay
3.5 
Shared Flat (apartment)
4.6 
Other
3.0 
Overall school rating by student age group
Students < 18 years (4 ratings)
4.5 
Students 18-30 years (17 ratings)
4.5 
Students 31-49 years (10 ratings)
4.3 
Students 50+ years (19 ratings)
4.5 
Verified reviews only, uncensored. All student opinions from students who booked a course at the school with LanguageCourse.net.

Individual Reviews

Les ateliers FL
26. May. 2025
 (60 years)   Course: Intensive Programme - 1 week
Overall rating

Rating: 5/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 5/5.0

Positive aspects of school
"The school is in a great location (metro) and has two supermarkets, cafés and places to eat nearby. The staff are all very committed and helpful."
Negative aspects
"The 1 1/2 hour lunch break shouldn't have been necessary, but I had come to terms with it and then it was fine."
Details of the review
Other comments
"Top, gladly again"
City/place
"Will go again, still lots to see!"
Quality of teaching / language progress
"Well structured, explained, good exercises, responsive to the students"
Accommodation
"There is a kitchen that you share with others. But it was clean, the layout of the cupboards and even the fridges was excellent. There was someone at reception around the clock and everyone was helpful and open."
City/place

Rating: 5/5.0

School organization

Rating: 5/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 4/5.0

Social activities

Rating: 5/5.0

Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 5/5.0

Accommodation
Year-Round Residence / Studio Standard

Rating: 5/5.0

30. Jan. 2025
 (51 years)   Course: Standard Programme - 1 week
Overall rating

Rating: 4/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 5/5.0

Positive aspects of school
"The hours of classes, the way of imparting knowledge, conducting lessons. Overall I liked it."
Negative aspects
"I did not know about the library, the afternoon classes are organised for a fee. I was only there for a short time so I cannot comment."
Details of the review
City/place

Rating: 5/5.0

School organization

Rating: 4/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 4/5.0

Social activities
---
Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 5/5.0

22. Oct. 2024
 (29 years)   Course: Intensive Programme - 1 week
Overall rating

Rating: 5/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 4/5.0

Positive aspects of school
"The teachers and the weather."
Negative aspects
"I would have liked more organised activities."
Details of the review
City/place

Rating: 5/5.0

School organization

Rating: 5/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 4/5.0

Social activities

Rating: 3/5.0

Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 5/5.0

Accommodation
Homestay

Rating: 4/5.0

28. Nov. 2022
 (20 years)  Canada Course: Standard Programme - 8 weeks
Overall rating

Rating: 5/5.0

Value for money
---
Positive aspects of school
"Teachers were very nice, learned a lot, and had an unforgettable time."
Details of the review
City/place

Rating: 4/5.0

School organization
---
Facilities (library, classrooms)
---
Social activities
---
Quality of teaching / language progress
---
Accommodation
Residence

Rating: 4/5.0

8. Nov. 2022
Clotilde    Course: Standard Programme - 2 weeks
Overall rating

Rating: 1/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 1/5.0

Negative aspects
"Bad organization and they scammed me with the classes and they did not return my money"
Details of the review
City/place

Rating: 1/5.0

School organization

Rating: 1/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 1/5.0

Social activities

Rating: 1/5.0

Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 1/5.0

25. Oct. 2022
 (18 years)   Course: Standard Programme - 4 weeks
Overall rating

Rating: 4/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 5/5.0

Positive aspects of school
"Students, teachers"
Negative aspects
"Changing location overnight"
Details of the review
City/place
"Always"
Quality of teaching / language progress
"Excellent course"
Accommodation
"Good overall"
City/place

Rating: 5/5.0

School organization

Rating: 4/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 4/5.0

Social activities

Rating: 3/5.0

Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 5/5.0

Accommodation
Homestay

Rating: 4/5.0

12. Jul. 2022
 (46 years)   Course: Super Intensive Programme - 1 week
Overall rating

Rating: 5/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 4/5.0

Positive aspects of school
"The location of the school is great and all the staff there are super nice and helpful. The teachers are great, I really enjoyed it."
Negative aspects
"Most of the participants are between 18 and 25, which is no problem, you just have to know beforehand and be prepared for it."
Details of the review
City/place
"Paris is beautiful with the buildings, the streets and the landmarks. However, it is also noisy, dirty, crowded, there is a lot of poverty and the traffic between 07.30h and 20.00h is a disaster!"
Quality of teaching / language progress
"The programme was great and just perfect for me."
City/place

Rating: 4/5.0

School organization

Rating: 4/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 3/5.0

Social activities

Rating: 4/5.0

Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 5/5.0

13. Jun. 2022
 (41 years)  Saudi Arabia Course: Super Intensive Programme - 2 weeks
Overall rating

Rating: 4/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 4/5.0

Positive aspects of school
"Teachers and school employees are so friendly the location is excellent"
Details of the review
Accommodation
"Hotel is very good but it is a little far from the school"
City/place

Rating: 5/5.0

School organization

Rating: 4/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 3/5.0

Social activities

Rating: 1/5.0

Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 3/5.0

Accommodation
Student Hotel

Rating: 3/5.0

16. Nov. 2021
 (69 years)  United States Course: Standard Programme - 2 weeks
Overall rating

Rating: 5/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 5/5.0

Positive aspects of school
"The teachers were terrific."
Details of the review
City/place
"The best!"
City/place

Rating: 5/5.0

School organization

Rating: 4/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 4/5.0

Social activities

Rating: 3/5.0

Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 5/5.0

8. Nov. 2021
 (44 years)  United Kingdom Course: Standard Programme - 1 week
Overall rating

Rating: 4/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 4/5.0

Positive aspects of school
"My teacher was excellent, the admin staff are great. Well located too."
Negative aspects
"I was initially placed in a class that was considerably below my level."
Details of the review
City/place
"It's a nice place to stay and visit, but it isn't easy to practice spoken French because too much of the city is geared towards tourists / tourism."
City/place

Rating: 4/5.0

School organization

Rating: 3/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 4/5.0

Social activities

Rating: 4/5.0

Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 5/5.0

13. Oct. 2020
 (19 years)   Course: Intensive Programme - 8 weeks
Overall rating

Rating: 4/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 4/5.0

Positive aspects of school
"The teachers were nice and very helpful. I also got to know friends from all over the world."
Negative aspects
"There weren't that many activities or I didn't notice. But that's probably due to Corona, so I can understand it."
Details of the review
City/place
"It was a great experience."
Quality of teaching / language progress
"I would have better taken the standard course. The only difference was that I had additional online classes, which I found boring and therefore didn't always show up."
City/place

Rating: 5/5.0

School organization

Rating: 4/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 3/5.0

Social activities

Rating: 2/5.0

Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 5/5.0

4. Feb. 2020
 (55 years)  China Course: Standard Programme - 1 week
Overall rating

Rating: 5/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 5/5.0

Positive aspects of school
"Dedicated teachers and administrators committed to making sure you could learn French."
Details of the review
Other comments
"A very good school."
City/place
"Loved being in Paris."
City/place

Rating: 5/5.0

School organization

Rating: 5/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 4/5.0

Social activities

Rating: 5/5.0

Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 5/5.0

15. Oct. 2019
 (72 years)  United States Course: Standard Programme - 2 weeks
Overall rating

Rating: 4/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 4/5.0

Positive aspects of school
"Karine was a dedicated teacher. She was pleasant and responded all our requests."
Insider tips about what future students should not miss
"School should think of installing a language lab for pronunciations studies."
Details of the review
Other comments
"School should renovate its bathrooms. They stink and are filthy. They are out of order every other day! The water pipes leak."
City/place
"It is a lovely city but they have to figure out a way to keep it clean...it is not much fun to walk through vomit and urine smell in the mornings!!!"
Accommodation
"Whatever kind of continental breakfast it is, it shouldn't be just toast, butter and jam every day. There can be fruit, cereal, cheese, croissant etc.etc...none of which requires any preparation. I really did not expect to sleep on an uncomfortable convertible couch on the floor with bunch of storage furniture- baby carriage, storage trunk etc. in the room. The room got freezing cold to study when the outside temp went down to 4 degrees C. Requested for some kind of heating unit was refused. Bathroom was another story, the shower head was so old that all the water spread out everywhere. Since there was no barrier except a small side glass, over a tub, all the water went to the floor and all over. The house owner put a some kind of carpet to collect the water but because it did not dry at all overnight, the whole place stank... I was looking into being with a French family to see their life style, and be a part of it. In this case, the family(?) that I stayed with was to give as little as possible but make the most of the financial arrangement with the school. It is unfortunate that a lot of the students coming are young and would not comment on any aspect of their homestay!"
City/place

Rating: 4/5.0

School organization

Rating: 4/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 3/5.0

Social activities

Rating: 3/5.0

Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 4/5.0

Accommodation
Homestay

Rating: 1/5.0

10. Jul. 2019
 (66 years)   Course: Standard Programme - 2 weeks
Overall rating

Rating: 4/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 4/5.0

Positive aspects of school
"The location of the school and the participants in the course. Also the possibility of a final discussion about the language skills you have acquired."
Insider tips about what future students should not miss
"The afternoon events, tours of churches, neighborhoods, film reviews, etc. are very interesting and should be published more clearly."
Details of the review
Other comments
"Friendly staff"
City/place
"Paris is a very beautiful, diverse city!"
Accommodation
"A quiet mini apartment with family connections"
City/place

Rating: 5/5.0

School organization

Rating: 4/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 3/5.0

Social activities

Rating: 4/5.0

Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 4/5.0

Accommodation
Homestay

Rating: 5/5.0

9. Jul. 2019
 (32 years)  United States Course: Super Intensive Programme - 1 week
Overall rating

Rating: 5/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 4/5.0

Positive aspects of school
"I love it!"
Details of the review
City/place

Rating: 5/5.0

School organization

Rating: 4/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 5/5.0

Social activities

Rating: 5/5.0

Quality of teaching / language progress
---
15. Jan. 2019
 (26 years)  Australia Course: Intensive Programme - 1 week
Overall rating

Rating: 5/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 4/5.0

Positive aspects of school
"I highly recommend France Langue Paris Notre Dame if you are planning to study French in Paris. The organisation and administration of the school is fantastic. I was only doing a one week course and yet all of my questions and requests were dealt with quickly. I managed to change classes 3 times in just one week and every teacher I had was kind and friendly but also very professional and effective."
Details of the review
City/place

Rating: 4/5.0

School organization

Rating: 5/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 5/5.0

Social activities
---
Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 5/5.0

18. Dec. 2018
 (30 years)  France Course: Intensive Programme - 3 weeks
Overall rating

Rating: 5/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 5/5.0

Positive aspects of school
"I liked the teacher Clémence the most."
Insider tips about what future students should not miss
"Arrive to school on time."
Details of the review
City/place

Rating: 5/5.0

School organization

Rating: 5/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 5/5.0

Social activities

Rating: 5/5.0

Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 5/5.0

1. Nov. 2018
 (23 years)   Course: Standard Programme - 24 weeks
Overall rating

Rating: 5/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 5/5.0

Positive aspects of school
"I really liked the attitude of the teachers and the flexibility of the school: if you understand that it is too difficult or too easy for you, you can always change the level and go to another class."
Insider tips about what future students should not miss
"Try speaking as much as possible, no matter how many mistakes you make. Attend all possible school activities."
Details of the review
Other comments
"Great school. Good value for money. I studied here from January to September, I started studying the language from scratch and now my level is b1, and I am preparing for a B2 exam."
City/place

Rating: 5/5.0

School organization

Rating: 5/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 4/5.0

Social activities

Rating: 5/5.0

Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 5/5.0

31. Oct. 2018
 (22 years)   Course: Standard Programme - 1 week
Overall rating

Rating: 5/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 5/5.0

Positive aspects of school
"The class was easy to understand"
Details of the review
City/place

Rating: 5/5.0

School organization

Rating: 4/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 4/5.0

Social activities

Rating: 2/5.0

Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 5/5.0

Accommodation
Homestay

Rating: 4/5.0

29. Oct. 2018
 (29 years)  Russia Course: Intensive French Course - 2 weeks
Overall rating

Rating: 5/5.0

Value for money
---
Positive aspects of school
"Location of the school, quality of lessons, diversity of the group."
Insider tips about what future students should not miss
"If they want to participate in some extracurriculum activity, it's better to ask for it upon registration."
Details of the review
City/place

Rating: 5/5.0

School organization

Rating: 5/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 5/5.0

Social activities

Rating: 4/5.0

Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 5/5.0

11. Sep. 2018
 (50 years)   Course: Standard Programme - 2 weeks
Overall rating

Rating: 5/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 5/5.0

Positive aspects of school
"Location. Not far from Sorbonne, near Notre Dame - in the heart of Latin Quarter."
Details of the review
City/place

Rating: 5/5.0

School organization

Rating: 5/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 5/5.0

Social activities

Rating: 5/5.0

Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 5/5.0

30. Aug. 2018
 (35 years)  United Kingdom Course: Intensive Programme - 3 weeks
Overall rating

Rating: 3/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 3/5.0

Positive aspects of school
"Some of the teachers are excellent"
Insider tips about what future students should not miss
"N/A"
Details of the review
Other comments
"The teacher of the class changed five times in the three weeks that I was there. This was frustrating, especially when it changed from an excellent teacher to a poor one! So more consistency would of been nicer."
City/place

Rating: 5/5.0

School organization

Rating: 4/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 3/5.0

Social activities

Rating: 3/5.0

Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 3/5.0

14. Aug. 2018
 (18 years)   Course: Standard Programme - 4 weeks
Overall rating

Rating: 5/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 5/5.0

Positive aspects of school
"Teaching method"
Details of the review
City/place

Rating: 5/5.0

School organization

Rating: 4/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 5/5.0

Social activities

Rating: 3/5.0

Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 5/5.0

Accommodation
Homestay

Rating: 5/5.0

11. May. 2018
 (52 years)   Course: Standard Programme - 2 weeks
Overall rating

Rating: 4/5.0

Value for money
---
Positive aspects of school
"The teacher Cynthia, the classmates and the atmosphere"
Insider tips about what future students should not miss
"The Notre Dame school is very small and does not always have spots available in the different courses. You think that if you choose this school, you will study there and in fact, they may have to send you to Victor Hugo, which happens frequently."
Details of the review
City/place

Rating: 5/5.0

School organization

Rating: 2/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 4/5.0

Social activities

Rating: 4/5.0

Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 5/5.0

8. May. 2018
 (50 years)   Course: Intensive Programme - 1 week
Overall rating

Rating: 4/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 4/5.0

Positive aspects of school
"Organization is great"
Details of the review
Other comments
"I was only there a week. During this week I have not been able to participate in activities which I regretted. For this a course of at least 2 weeks is recommended. Also for booking progress with the language. Yet I have had a valuable week. I'm sure I'll be back next year for a longer stay."
City/place

Rating: 5/5.0

School organization

Rating: 4/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 4/5.0

Social activities

Rating: 4/5.0

Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 3/5.0

7. May. 2018
 (52 years)   Course: Standard Programme - 2 weeks
Overall rating

Rating: 4/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 4/5.0

Positive aspects of school
"The quality of their teaching and their teachers."
Insider tips about what future students should not miss
"It is very important and the school does not have it specified on their page, that there is no guarantee that the course will take place at the centre the student registers for. That is to say, after the level test they decide, according to the quota, if you study in Notre Dame or in Victor Hugo."
Details of the review
City/place

Rating: 5/5.0

School organization

Rating: 3/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 5/5.0

Social activities

Rating: 5/5.0

Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 5/5.0

20. Feb. 2018
 (58 years)   Course: Standard Programme - 1 week
Overall rating

Rating: 3/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 3/5.0

Positive aspects of school
"Atmosphere of the building"
Insider tips about what future students should not miss
"English power"
Details of the review
City/place

Rating: 5/5.0

School organization

Rating: 4/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 3/5.0

Social activities
---
Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 2/5.0

18. Dec. 2017
Johanna (27 years)  United Kingdom Course: Standard Programme - 1 week
Overall rating

Rating: 3/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 4/5.0

Insider tips about what future students should not miss
"The organised activities are good and conducted in French."
Details of the review
Other comments
"The school is in a great location. The teacher was very good. However, the school is a bit run down and worse for wear. For me, I was very disappointed to be put in the B2 class which was too easy for me. It was fine when the teacher was teaching and in solo activities but I was far above the rest of the class when we had to do group work. The school would not put me up a level which was very disappointing. The school had made it sound very easy to move in the opening presentation but when I asked to move, they said they would only do it on the teacher's recommendation."
City/place

Rating: 5/5.0

School organization

Rating: 3/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 3/5.0

Social activities

Rating: 5/5.0

Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 5/5.0

13. Nov. 2017
 (54 years)  Australia Course: Standard Programme - 8 weeks
Overall rating

Rating: 4/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 4/5.0

Positive aspects of school
"Good interaction with the teachers and administrative staff was always friendly and willing to help with all sorts of different things."
Insider tips about what future students should not miss
"Walking tours and cinema club"
Details of the review
City/place

Rating: 5/5.0

School organization

Rating: 4/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 3/5.0

Social activities

Rating: 4/5.0

Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 4/5.0

18. Jul. 2017
 (58 years)   Course: Standard Programme - 2 weeks
Overall rating

Rating: 5/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 5/5.0

Positive aspects of school
"My teacher, Celine, was excellent."
Details of the review
Other comments
"I would like to know how many levels there are. I wondered exactly what level I was attending and what more was to come."
City/place

Rating: 5/5.0

School organization

Rating: 5/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 5/5.0

Social activities

Rating: 5/5.0

Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 5/5.0

Accommodation
Homestay

Rating: 5/5.0

11. Feb. 2020
Natalia (43 years)  Russia Course: Super Intensive Programme - 1 week
Overall rating

Rating: 4/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 5/5.0

Details of the review
Quality of teaching / language progress
"The course civilization was really interesting, the rest not always so"
City/place

Rating: 5/5.0

School organization

Rating: 5/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 4/5.0

Social activities
---
Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 4/5.0

17. Oct. 2019
Carlos (65 years)   Course: Intensive Programme - 2 weeks
Overall rating

Rating: 5/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 5/5.0

Details of the review
City/place
"The city of light."
Quality of teaching / language progress
"GOOD COURSE."
Accommodation
"Excellent room: clean, tidy and with enough light. Excellent family. A bit far from the school but with good public transport."
City/place

Rating: 5/5.0

School organization

Rating: 5/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 5/5.0

Social activities

Rating: 5/5.0

Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 5/5.0

Accommodation
Homestay

Rating: 5/5.0

30. Sep. 2019
Armando (71 years)  Germany Course: Standard Programme - 4 weeks
Overall rating

Rating: 5/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 5/5.0

Details of the review
Accommodation
"Very bad!"
City/place

Rating: 4/5.0

School organization

Rating: 5/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 5/5.0

Social activities
---
Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 5/5.0

Accommodation
Homestay

Rating: 1/5.0

30. Sep. 2019
Petra  (71 years)  Germany Course: Standard Programme - 4 weeks
Overall rating

Rating: 5/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 5/5.0

Details of the review
Accommodation
"Very bad!"
City/place

Rating: 4/5.0

School organization

Rating: 5/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 5/5.0

Social activities
---
Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 5/5.0

Accommodation
Homestay

Rating: 1/5.0

22. Dec. 2025
Daniela (46 years)   Course: Standard Programme - 1 week
Overall rating

Rating: 4/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 4/5.0

Details of the review
City/place

Rating: 4/5.0

School organization

Rating: 1/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 3/5.0

Social activities

Rating: 3/5.0

Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 3/5.0

2. Sep. 2025
Roza (20 years)   Course: Standard Programme - 4 weeks
Overall rating

Rating: 5/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 5/5.0

Details of the review
City/place

Rating: 5/5.0

School organization

Rating: 5/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 5/5.0

Social activities
---
Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 5/5.0

Accommodation
Summer Residence

Rating: 5/5.0

4. Mar. 2024
Fran  (63 years)  Australia Course: Standard Programme - 2 weeks
Overall rating

Rating: 5/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 5/5.0

Details of the review
City/place

Rating: 5/5.0

School organization

Rating: 5/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 4/5.0

Social activities

Rating: 4/5.0

Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 4/5.0

Accommodation
Other

Rating: 4/5.0

4. Sep. 2023
Yuko   Japan Course: Standard Programme - 2 weeks
Overall rating
---
Value for money
---
Details of the review
City/place
---
School organization
---
Facilities (library, classrooms)
---
Social activities
---
Quality of teaching / language progress
---
10. Apr. 2023
Shiena   Japan Course: Standard Programme - 3 weeks
Overall rating
---
Value for money
---
Details of the review
City/place
---
School organization
---
Facilities (library, classrooms)
---
Social activities
---
Quality of teaching / language progress
---
15. Oct. 2022
Jalal   Egypt Course: French + Internship - 2 weeks
Overall rating

Rating: 5/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 3/5.0

Details of the review
City/place

Rating: 5/5.0

School organization

Rating: 5/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 5/5.0

Social activities

Rating: 5/5.0

Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 5/5.0

5. Jul. 2022
Elettra   Italy Course: Standard Programme - 2 weeks
Overall rating
---
Value for money
---
Details of the review
City/place
---
School organization
---
Facilities (library, classrooms)
---
Social activities
---
Quality of teaching / language progress
---
20. Sep. 2021
Madleine   Israel Course: French + Cooking - 1 week
Overall rating
---
Value for money
---
Details of the review
City/place
---
School organization
---
Facilities (library, classrooms)
---
Social activities
---
Quality of teaching / language progress
---
6. Sep. 2021
Weronika (24 years)   Course: Standard Programme - 1 week
Overall rating

Rating: 1/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 1/5.0

Details of the review
City/place

Rating: 5/5.0

School organization

Rating: 1/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 1/5.0

Social activities

Rating: 1/5.0

Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 1/5.0

Accommodation
Homestay

Rating: 1/5.0

9. Mar. 2020
Wenxuan (21 years)   Course: Intensive Programme - 3 weeks
Overall rating

Rating: 5/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 4/5.0

Details of the review
City/place

Rating: 5/5.0

School organization

Rating: 5/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 4/5.0

Social activities

Rating: 5/5.0

Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 5/5.0

17. Feb. 2020
Vilde (27 years)  Norway Course: Super Intensive Programme - 1 week
Overall rating

Rating: 5/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 5/5.0

Details of the review
City/place

Rating: 5/5.0

School organization

Rating: 5/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 4/5.0

Social activities
---
Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 5/5.0

6. Jan. 2020
Carlos Eduardo (43 years)  Mexico Course: Standard Programme - 3 weeks
Overall rating

Rating: 4/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 4/5.0

Details of the review
City/place

Rating: 5/5.0

School organization

Rating: 5/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 5/5.0

Social activities

Rating: 3/5.0

Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 4/5.0

Accommodation
Homestay

Rating: 5/5.0

30. Dec. 2019
Magsud  (19 years)  United States Course: Standard Programme - 1 week
Overall rating

Rating: 5/5.0

Value for money
---
Details of the review
City/place

Rating: 5/5.0

School organization

Rating: 5/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 5/5.0

Social activities

Rating: 5/5.0

Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 5/5.0

Accommodation
The Student Hotel

Rating: 5/5.0

5. Sep. 2019
Aika (20 years)  Japan Course: Christmas Programme - 1 week
Overall rating

Rating: 5/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 3/5.0

Details of the review
City/place

Rating: 5/5.0

School organization

Rating: 4/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 3/5.0

Social activities

Rating: 3/5.0

Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 4/5.0

2. Aug. 2019
Michal (17 years)  Poland Course: Standard Programme - 2 weeks
Overall rating

Rating: 5/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 4/5.0

Details of the review
City/place

Rating: 5/5.0

School organization

Rating: 5/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 5/5.0

Social activities

Rating: 5/5.0

Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 5/5.0

18. Jun. 2019
Nadine (30 years)  Switzerland Course: Standard Programme - 2 weeks
Overall rating

Rating: 4/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 3/5.0

Details of the review
City/place

Rating: 5/5.0

School organization

Rating: 3/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 3/5.0

Social activities

Rating: 3/5.0

Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 5/5.0

10. Jun. 2019
Victoria (30 years)  United Kingdom Course: Intensive Programme - 2 weeks
Overall rating

Rating: 5/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 4/5.0

Details of the review
City/place
---
School organization

Rating: 5/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 3/5.0

Social activities

Rating: 5/5.0

Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 5/5.0

28. May. 2019
Vladimir  (50 years)  Russia Course: Standard Programme - 1 week
Overall rating

Rating: 5/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 5/5.0

Details of the review
City/place

Rating: 5/5.0

School organization

Rating: 5/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 5/5.0

Social activities

Rating: 5/5.0

Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 5/5.0

12. Sep. 2018
Oana Elena (17 years)   Course: Intensive Programme - 2 weeks
Overall rating

Rating: 4/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 3/5.0

Details of the review
City/place

Rating: 5/5.0

School organization

Rating: 4/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 3/5.0

Social activities

Rating: 3/5.0

Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 4/5.0

27. Nov. 2017
Jose (63 years)   Course: Intensive Programme - 2 weeks
Overall rating

Rating: 4/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 5/5.0

Details of the review
City/place

Rating: 5/5.0

School organization

Rating: 4/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 3/5.0

Social activities

Rating: 4/5.0

Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 5/5.0

30. Aug. 2017
Giorgio (21 years)  Italy Course: Standard Programme - 2 weeks
Overall rating

Rating: 5/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 4/5.0

Details of the review
City/place

Rating: 5/5.0

School organization

Rating: 5/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 4/5.0

Social activities

Rating: 4/5.0

Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 4/5.0

Accommodation
Homestay

Rating: 4/5.0


Terms & ConditionsRefund PolicyPrivacy & CookiesAbout UsContact UsImprintReview & User Content PoliciesTrust & SafetyAffiliate ProgrammeAdd Your School
© 1999 - 2026 LanguageCourse S.L.