+1-646 503 18 10
Back to BWS Germanlingua, Munich

Reviews of BWS Germanlingua, Munich, Germany

NOTE: All reviews are authentic. Only students who booked their course through us can publish evaluations here, and only after the end of their programme. These evaluations then are not manipulated in any way, neither by us nor by the school, and can be trusted as honest opinions about personal experiences with the school.

Average Rating

4.1
Overall rating
BWS Germanlingua, Munich, Germany
Based on 40 reviews of former students of BWS Germanlingua
School
Location of the school
5.0 
Facilities
3.5 
Social activities
3.5 
Organisation
3.8 
Course
Quality of teaching
3.9 
Value for money
3.4 
Accommodation
Homestay
3.4 
Shared Flat (apartment)
2.5 
Overall school rating by student age group
Students < 18 years (3 ratings)
4.3 
Students 18-30 years (14 ratings)
3.7 
Students 31-49 years (2 ratings)
4.0 
Students 50+ years (8 ratings)
4.2 
Verified reviews only, uncensored. All student opinions from students who booked a course at the school with LanguageCourse.net.

Individual Reviews

BWS Germanlingua
31. Jul. 2024
 (57 years)  Brazil Course: Intensive Course - 4 weeks
Overall rating

Rating: 5/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 5/5.0

Positive aspects of school
"School is very organized and the teachers are committed and concerned on student's learning process, especially Marco and Michael. They were very friendly and helpful, always dedicated to offer the best classes and materials."
Details of the review
City/place

Rating: 4/5.0

School organization

Rating: 5/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 4/5.0

Social activities

Rating: 1/5.0

Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 4/5.0

24. Jul. 2012
 (39 years)   Course: Intensive - 1 week
Overall rating

Rating: 3/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 3/5.0

Positive aspects of school
"LIMITED NUMBER OF PARTICIPANTS PER CLASS"
Insider tips about what future students should not miss
"THE ADDITIONAL HOUR OF THE INTENSIVE COURSE IS NOT HELD IN THE CLASSROOM"
Details of the review
Other comments
"LANGUAGE LEVELS NOT ALWAYS APPROPRIATE"
City/place

Rating: 4/5.0

School organization

Rating: 3/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 3/5.0

Social activities

Rating: 2/5.0

Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 3/5.0

Accommodation
Homestay

Rating: 2/5.0

21. Feb. 2011
 (18 years)  Poland Course: Combined (Standard + 5 one-to-one) - 2 weeks
Overall rating

Rating: 4/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 4/5.0

Positive aspects of school
"Methods of teaching used."
Details of the review
City/place

Rating: 5/5.0

School organization

Rating: 3/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 4/5.0

Social activities

Rating: 4/5.0

Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 4/5.0

Accommodation
Homestay

Rating: 5/5.0

29. Sep. 2008
 (25 years)   Course: Standard - 3 weeks
Overall rating

Rating: 3/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 2/5.0

Positive aspects of school
"The inexpensive excursions organized by Johanna, and the friendly teachers."
Details of the review
City/place

Rating: 5/5.0

School organization

Rating: 4/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 4/5.0

Social activities

Rating: 4/5.0

Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 3/5.0

Accommodation
Student Residence/Shared flat

Rating: 2/5.0

5. Dec. 2007
 (24 years)   Course: Intensive - 3 weeks
Overall rating

Rating: 4/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 2/5.0

Positive aspects of school
"Environment"
Insider tips about what future students should not miss
"Many Italian / Swiss"
Details of the review
Other comments
"Great atmosphere .."
City/place

Rating: 4/5.0

School organization

Rating: 4/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 4/5.0

Social activities

Rating: 4/5.0

Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 4/5.0

Accommodation
Homestay

Rating: 2/5.0

11. Jul. 2007
 (19 years)  Germany Course: Intensive - 1 week
Overall rating

Rating: 4/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 4/5.0

Positive aspects of school
"Enjoyed that it wasn´t so big, good facillities such as access to internet etc. Good class sizes."
Details of the review
City/place

Rating: 5/5.0

School organization

Rating: 4/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 4/5.0

Social activities
---
Quality of teaching / language progress
---
4. Jul. 2007
 (21 years)   Course: Intensive - 3 weeks
Overall rating

Rating: 4/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 4/5.0

Positive aspects of school
"The people and the teachers"
Insider tips about what future students should not miss
"Everything"
Details of the review
City/place

Rating: 5/5.0

School organization

Rating: 4/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 3/5.0

Social activities

Rating: 3/5.0

Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 4/5.0

9. Dec. 2006
 (26 years)  Australia Course: Standard - 2 weeks
Overall rating

Rating: 4/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 3/5.0

Positive aspects of school
"Teacher Gilia was kind"
Details of the review
City/place

Rating: 4/5.0

School organization

Rating: 4/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 2/5.0

Social activities

Rating: 3/5.0

Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 4/5.0

29. Nov. 2006
 (23 years)   Course: Intensive - 5 weeks
Overall rating

Rating: 5/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 3/5.0

Positive aspects of school
"You meet people from all over the world"
Insider tips about what future students should not miss
"Nothing special, they will find all in here"
Details of the review
Other comments
"Very good organization"
City/place

Rating: 5/5.0

School organization

Rating: 5/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 5/5.0

Social activities

Rating: 4/5.0

Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 5/5.0

5. Nov. 2006
 (61 years)   Course: Standard - 2 weeks
Overall rating

Rating: 4/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 4/5.0

Positive aspects of school
"Great teachers and helpful staff"
Details of the review
City/place

Rating: 5/5.0

School organization

Rating: 4/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 4/5.0

Social activities

Rating: 4/5.0

Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 5/5.0

31. Aug. 2006
 (19 years)   Course: Intensive - 3 weeks
Overall rating

Rating: 5/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 3/5.0

Positive aspects of school
"Internet :P"
Insider tips about what future students should not miss
"Activities aren't scheduled everyday, so you'd better get informed on what school has planned for its student on time"
Details of the review
City/place

Rating: 5/5.0

School organization

Rating: 3/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 5/5.0

Social activities

Rating: 4/5.0

Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 4/5.0

Accommodation
Homestay Executive

Rating: 5/5.0

27. Feb. 2006
 (30 years)   Course: One-to-One 30 - 2 weeks
Overall rating

Rating: 4/5.0

Value for money
---
Positive aspects of school
"Location of the school, the teachers"
Details of the review
City/place

Rating: 5/5.0

School organization

Rating: 3/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 4/5.0

Social activities

Rating: 4/5.0

Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 5/5.0

8. Feb. 2006
   Netherlands Course: One-to-One 30 - 1 week
Overall rating

Rating: 4/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 4/5.0

Positive aspects of school
"Individual teaching/good location"
Details of the review
Other comments
"Pleasant atmosphere"
City/place

Rating: 4/5.0

School organization

Rating: 4/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 3/5.0

Social activities

Rating: 1/5.0

Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 4/5.0

19. Dec. 2005
   Germany Course: One-to-One 10 - 1 week
Overall rating

Rating: 4/5.0

Value for money
---
Positive aspects of school
"Flexibility of the programme"
Details of the review
Other comments
"The teachers are very enthusiastic."
City/place

Rating: 5/5.0

School organization

Rating: 4/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 4/5.0

Social activities
---
Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 4/5.0

19. Dec. 2005
    Course: Standard - 1 week
Overall rating

Rating: 5/5.0

Value for money
---
Positive aspects of school
"Very good teachers, friendly atmosphere and helpful and efficient staff"
Details of the review
City/place

Rating: 5/5.0

School organization

Rating: 5/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)
---
Social activities

Rating: 4/5.0

Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 5/5.0

19. Dec. 2005
    Course: Standard - 3 weeks
Overall rating

Rating: 5/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 4/5.0

Positive aspects of school
"I liked when the teachers helped the students"
Details of the review
Other comments
"München Sprachschule is wonderful"
City/place

Rating: 5/5.0

School organization

Rating: 5/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 5/5.0

Social activities

Rating: 5/5.0

Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 5/5.0

21. Jul. 2005
 (19 years)  Dk Course: Standard
Overall rating

Rating: 5/5.0

Value for money
---
Positive aspects of school
"The teaching"
Details of the review
Other comments
"Maybe you should make some activities where people are forced to get to know each other a little better, like social plays. I was the only dane and it was a little difficult to get in the "group" because the students with the same nationality were together and I was alone. So maybe some creatives physical plays could help."
City/place

Rating: 5/5.0

School organization

Rating: 4/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 4/5.0

Social activities

Rating: 3/5.0

Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 5/5.0

21. Apr. 2005
 (30 years)  Ukraine Course: Standard
Overall rating

Rating: 5/5.0

Value for money
---
Positive aspects of school
"The staff is very helpful"
Details of the review
City/place

Rating: 4/5.0

School organization

Rating: 5/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 4/5.0

Social activities

Rating: 5/5.0

Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 5/5.0

6. Aug. 2004
 (23 years)  Japan Course: Standard
Overall rating

Rating: 5/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 4/5.0

Positive aspects of school
"Teachers"
Insider tips about what future students should not miss
"In summer, there are too many students to learn. I think it is better not to visit in summer."
Details of the review
Other comments
"The teachers are really kind. At first I could not speak german absolutelly,but after 4 month I could speak good german. Addition to that I could make a lot of friends!!!"
City/place

Rating: 5/5.0

School organization

Rating: 5/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 4/5.0

Social activities

Rating: 5/5.0

Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 5/5.0

22. May. 2004
 (25 years)  South African Living In Dubai Course: Standard
Overall rating

Rating: 5/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 5/5.0

Positive aspects of school
"The staff were very attentive to me as an individual person."
Insider tips about what future students should not miss
"Practice what you have learnt the day when you are out touring!"
Details of the review
City/place

Rating: 4/5.0

School organization

Rating: 4/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 3/5.0

Social activities

Rating: 4/5.0

Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 5/5.0

19. May. 2004
   Japanese Course: Standard
Overall rating

Rating: 5/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 5/5.0

Positive aspects of school
"Facility"
Negative aspects
"Nothing"
Insider tips about what future students should not miss
"Try it"
Details of the review
City/place

Rating: 5/5.0

School organization

Rating: 5/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 5/5.0

Social activities

Rating: 3/5.0

Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 4/5.0

18. Sep. 2003
Tania (30 years)  Brazil Course: Standard
Overall rating

Rating: 4/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 3/5.0

Negative aspects
"Teachers change every week."
Details of the review
City/place

Rating: 4/5.0

School organization

Rating: 4/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 3/5.0

Social activities

Rating: 4/5.0

Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 3/5.0

8. Jun. 2003
 (33 years)  Usa Course: Standard
Overall rating

Rating: 4/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 4/5.0

Positive aspects of school
"Small class size-very important"
Negative aspects
"The afternoon class, the intensive session, was always taught by a different instructor. Some were good, others not so good."
Insider tips about what future students should not miss
"Attend the after school gatherings so that you can meet other students."
Details of the review
City/place

Rating: 5/5.0

School organization

Rating: 4/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 3/5.0

Social activities

Rating: 4/5.0

Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 4/5.0

14. Oct. 2002
 (20 years)  Gb Course: Standard
Overall rating

Rating: 4/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 4/5.0

Positive aspects of school
"Friendly"
Insider tips about what future students should not miss
"Getting to know the other students!"
Details of the review
City/place

Rating: 5/5.0

School organization

Rating: 3/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 4/5.0

Social activities

Rating: 4/5.0

Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 4/5.0

30. Jan. 2001
 (23 years)  Sweden Course: Standard
Overall rating

Rating: 4/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 3/5.0

Positive aspects of school
"Small classes and nice teachers"
Negative aspects
"The difference in speachlevels between the students in the class was too big"
Details of the review
City/place

Rating: 4/5.0

School organization

Rating: 3/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 3/5.0

Social activities

Rating: 4/5.0

Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 3/5.0

23. Jul. 2000
Cristina   Switzerland  Course: Standard
Overall rating

Rating: 3/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 2/5.0

Negative aspects
"The host family"
Details of the review
City/place

Rating: 4/5.0

School organization

Rating: 4/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 4/5.0

Social activities

Rating: 4/5.0

Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 3/5.0

7. Oct. 2002
Vivian (25 years)  Norway Course: Standard
Overall rating

Rating: 5/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 3/5.0

Details of the review
Other comments
"The students had very different qualifications with the German language, and it would be better to have classes you could choose if you want to learn more grammar, alking or writing."
City/place

Rating: 5/5.0

School organization

Rating: 4/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 3/5.0

Social activities

Rating: 4/5.0

Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 4/5.0

13. Dec. 2022
Nicholas (18 years)  United Kingdom Course: Standard Course - 10 weeks
Overall rating

Rating: 4/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 4/5.0

Details of the review
City/place

Rating: 5/5.0

School organization

Rating: 4/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 4/5.0

Social activities

Rating: 4/5.0

Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 4/5.0

Accommodation
Homestay

Rating: 3/5.0

22. Nov. 2021
Tatjana   Switzerland Course: Intensive Course - 2 weeks
Overall rating

Rating: 5/5.0

Value for money
---
Details of the review
City/place
---
School organization
---
Facilities (library, classrooms)
---
Social activities
---
Quality of teaching / language progress
---
13. Jan. 2020
Olivier (52 years)   Course: Intensive Course - 1 week
Overall rating

Rating: 3/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 3/5.0

Details of the review
City/place

Rating: 4/5.0

School organization

Rating: 2/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 3/5.0

Social activities

Rating: 1/5.0

Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 2/5.0

Accommodation
Homestay

Rating: 4/5.0

7. May. 2008
Noriko (30 years)   Course: Standard - 3 weeks
Overall rating

Rating: 4/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 3/5.0

Details of the review
City/place

Rating: 5/5.0

School organization

Rating: 3/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 2/5.0

Social activities

Rating: 2/5.0

Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 3/5.0

Accommodation
Homestay

Rating: 3/5.0

7. Nov. 2007
Tiziana (26 years)   Course: Combined (Standard + 5 one-to-one) - 2 weeks
Overall rating

Rating: 3/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 3/5.0

Details of the review
City/place

Rating: 4/5.0

School organization

Rating: 3/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 3/5.0

Social activities

Rating: 4/5.0

Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 3/5.0

Accommodation
Student Residence/Shared flat

Rating: 3/5.0

19. Sep. 2007
Gema (21 years)   Course: Standard - 3 weeks
Overall rating

Rating: 4/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 3/5.0

Details of the review
City/place

Rating: 5/5.0

School organization

Rating: 4/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 3/5.0

Social activities

Rating: 4/5.0

Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 3/5.0

22. Aug. 2007
Talia (22 years)   Course: Standard - 3 weeks
Overall rating

Rating: 4/5.0

Value for money
---
Details of the review
City/place

Rating: 5/5.0

School organization

Rating: 3/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 3/5.0

Social activities

Rating: 1/5.0

Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 4/5.0

18. Aug. 2007
Ayano (30 years)   Course: Standard - 40 weeks
Overall rating

Rating: 3/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 3/5.0

Details of the review
City/place

Rating: 4/5.0

School organization

Rating: 3/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 2/5.0

Social activities

Rating: 3/5.0

Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 2/5.0

16. Aug. 2007
J. Javier (31 years)  Spain Course: Intensive - 2 weeks
Overall rating

Rating: 3/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 3/5.0

Details of the review
City/place

Rating: 5/5.0

School organization

Rating: 3/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 1/5.0

Social activities

Rating: 4/5.0

Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 4/5.0

1. Feb. 2007
Edwin Vinicio (21 years)   Course: Intensive - 1 week
Overall rating

Rating: 4/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 2/5.0

Details of the review
City/place

Rating: 5/5.0

School organization

Rating: 4/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 4/5.0

Social activities

Rating: 4/5.0

Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 4/5.0

9. Dec. 2006
Patrick (24 years)  Australia Course: Standard - 2 weeks
Overall rating

Rating: 3/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 3/5.0

Details of the review
City/place

Rating: 4/5.0

School organization

Rating: 2/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 2/5.0

Social activities

Rating: 3/5.0

Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 4/5.0

21. Aug. 2005
Julia (16 years)  Sweden Course: Standard
Overall rating

Rating: 4/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 4/5.0

Details of the review
City/place

Rating: 4/5.0

School organization

Rating: 4/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 5/5.0

Social activities

Rating: 4/5.0

Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 4/5.0

15. Aug. 2000
Anonymous    Course: Standard
Overall rating

Rating: 4/5.0

Value for money

Rating: 3/5.0

Details of the review
City/place

Rating: 5/5.0

School organization

Rating: 4/5.0

Facilities (library, classrooms)

Rating: 4/5.0

Social activities

Rating: 3/5.0

Quality of teaching / language progress

Rating: 4/5.0


Terms & conditionsRefund policyPrivacy & cookiesAbout usContact UsImprintReview & user content policiesTrust & safetyAffiliate programmeAdd your school
© 1999 - 2026 LanguageCourse S.L.